Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 The Flood of Noah CONFIRMED!
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 02/24/2010 :  05:43:22   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
cantbe323 is so easy to take down, he's not very entertaining. He claims to want a debate, even to the extent of calling me out, then refuses to get down with it. I suspect that he knows what will happen to him if we ever open a thread and clear the dance floor. Hell, with any of us, really -- I'd like to see him get it on with Dave w.

But I don't care about that so much; I'd like to see him, just once, produce an actual argument -- something we can get our teeth into.

In his debut OP, he claimed that science knows nothing of the human brain. I posted a link demonstrating that science knows a great deal about that oft confused organ. This he promptly waved off without opening the link, and he's been hand-waving ever since.

So, I've been amusing myself by doing what a skeptic does best: researching stuff. I know perfectly well he won't look at any of it but others might find it interesting.

The man's got no curiosity and that's just sad.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Edited by - filthy on 02/24/2010 06:32:05
Go to Top of Page

bngbuck
SFN Addict

USA
2437 Posts

Posted - 02/24/2010 :  10:50:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bngbuck a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Dr. Mabuse.....

He claims to be an engineer, but even a mediocre engineer would have respect for the scientific process. And stupid shit like this only confirms to me that he's a fake, not even an engineer.
Wiki states:
Engineering is the discipline, art and profession of acquiring and applying technical, scientific, and mathematical knowledge to design and implement materials, structures, machines, devices, systems, and processes that safely realize a desired objective or invention."
Wiki goes on to define the classical definition of engineering and to define modern permutations.
Historically the main Branches of Engineering are categorized as follows:[14][17]

Aerospace engineering - The design of aircraft, spacecraft and related topics.
Chemical engineering - The exploitation of chemical principles in order to carry out large scale chemical process, as well as designing new specialty materials and fuels.
Civil engineering - The design and construction of public and private works, such as infrastructure (roads, railways, water supply and treatment etc.), bridges and buildings.
Electrical engineering - a very broad area that may encompass the design and study of various electrical & electronic systems, such as electrical circuits, generators, motors, electromagnetic/electromechanical devices, electronic devices, electronic circuits, optical fibers, optoelectronic devices, computer systems, telecommunications.
Mechanical engineering - The design of physical or mechanical systems, such as engines, powertrains, kinematic chains, vacuum technology, and vibration isolation equipment.

With the rapid advancement of technology many new fields are gaining prominence and new branches are developing such as materials engineering, computer engineering, software engineering, nanotechnology, tribology, molecular engineering, mechatronics, etc. These new specialties sometimes combine with the traditional fields and form new branches such as mechanical engineering and mechatronics and electrical and computer engineering. A new or emerging area of application will commonly be defined temporarily as a permutation or subset of existing disciplines; there is often gray area as to when a given sub-field becomes large and/or prominent enough to warrant classification as a new "branch."

One key indicator of such emergence is when major universities start establishing departments and programs in the new field.

For each of these fields there exists considerable overlap, especially in the areas of the application of sciences to their disciplines such as physics, chemistry and mathematics.


cantbe123 probably has a Lionel layout in his basement!

Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 02/24/2010 :  15:08:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by bngbuck
cantbe123 probably has a Lionel layout in his basement!

Hey! Don't knock model railways!
I spent many many hours in my youth constructing and modifying my Märklin H0 model.
I guess my desire to automate the train system and other miniature gear belonging to the model was an integral part in my early intrest and discovering of electrical engineering and electronics.

But if a real electric train represents high voltage, high current, low frequency application of electrical engineering, then today I'm working at the opposite end of the spectrum: the circuit-board I was working on this afternoon was a 3,3V low power reciever working at 2,6 GHz. Go figure...




Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

Fripp
SFN Regular

USA
727 Posts

Posted - 02/24/2010 :  16:44:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fripp a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by cantbe323

Paleontology and carbon dating old bones by radioactive isotopes to determine how old they are, are more educated guess science that can't be proven by demonstration, another in a long list of other science theories that are part of our sacred belief culture that can't or won't be questioned, but as long as nobody gets hurt... qua sera.

cantbe323>>

The bones themselves are not dated; rather the strata they are found in is. And it is not done with the carbon dating process, but by radiometric dating. >>

As I said in another post, I know just enough science to question what works and what doesn't work to open further debate.

cantbe323



Please, tell us how radiometric dating is supposed to work and why that assumption is wrong.

Please illuminate us and lay waste to our petty assumptions. I really really REALLY want my limited worldview shaken and torn to pieces. I have no doubt that I will be left speechless.

CAUTION: claiming that there is some undefined "gotcha" in my above request is not permitted. In short, that's a coward's cop out.

"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"

"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"

"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?"
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 02/24/2010 :  17:08:29   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm now convinced that cantbe's only goal here is to disrupt discussion with statements so inane that most real skeptics feel compelled to reply to them. Facts mean nothing to him in his posts. They don't serve his simple purpose.

Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Fripp
SFN Regular

USA
727 Posts

Posted - 02/24/2010 :  17:55:53   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fripp a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by HalfMooner

I'm now convinced that cantbe's only goal here is to disrupt discussion with statements so inane that most real skeptics feel compelled to reply to them. Facts mean nothing to him in his posts. They don't serve his simple purpose.


Of course, and it's my mission to be the bane of his existence. This is an entertaining diversion. I'm the IT dept, staff of one, and every meeting I go to adds 3-4 more tasks. The past 2 weeks have been insane. This is nice pressure release.

I brought a doctor's note excusing me from meetings because I'm allergic to them, but they didn't buy it. Maybe it was the signature of "Steve's Doctor".

"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"

"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"

"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?"
Go to Top of Page

bngbuck
SFN Addict

USA
2437 Posts

Posted - 02/24/2010 :  20:54:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bngbuck a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Mooner.....

I'm now convinced that cantbe's only goal here is to disrupt discussion with statements so inane that most real skeptics feel compelled to reply to them. Facts mean nothing to him in his posts. They don't serve his simple purpose.
And several others, including Kil are convinced he's a troll. Let's see, wiki says:
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
IMHO there is little doubt that this blathering idiot fits the definition to a T.

As I understand the arcane conventions of Internet tradition, Trolls are to be banned when it becomes clear that they are, indeed, Trolls!

However, cantbe123 provides amusement and diversion to some (as in Fripp, above) and opportunity to others, including top management. Also he is a perfect whipping boy for those with anger management problems, and a near perfect foil for showboating and major to minor ego expressions of "notice me"

Personally, all of the above certainly works for me from time to time, and I freely plead guilty to all such transgressions. I wonder what other folks here feel about keeping pinãtas such as 123 around to provide delightful daily opportunities to vent our sadistic urges. I vote keep him as a pet puppy to whip when you just gotta take it out on somebody! He apparently enjoys successfully plying his trade!
Go to Top of Page

cantbe323
Suspended

242 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2010 :  15:28:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send cantbe323 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm now convinced that cantbe's only goal here is to disrupt discussion with statements so inane that most real skeptics feel compelled to reply to them. Facts mean nothing to him in his posts. They don't serve his simple purpose. >>

My take on facts are actual effects you can see, not just what's written in scientific books or scientific theories, and my one and only goal is to raise questions and possible debate on established practices that don't make sense to me. That's all, nothing treasonable.

I'm here to learn, not disrupt, or make any waves, and I would hope that others would feel the same way.

cantbe323
Go to Top of Page

cantbe323
Suspended

242 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2010 :  15:50:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send cantbe323 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
In his debut OP, cantbe claimed that science knows nothing of the human brain. I posted a link demonstrating that science knows a great deal about that oft confused organ. This he promptly waved off without opening the link, and he's been hand-waving ever since. >>

Sounds more like a one-sided eulogy than a debate. Our main difference is that you believe everything scientists write or say, and I believe some scientists theories are questionable, including what they claim to know about the functions of the human brain.

cantbe323
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2010 :  15:59:09   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by cantbe323

In his debut OP, cantbe claimed that science knows nothing of the human brain. I posted a link demonstrating that science knows a great deal about that oft confused organ. This he promptly waved off without opening the link, and he's been hand-waving ever since. >>

Sounds more like a one-sided eulogy than a debate. Our main difference is that you believe everything scientists write or say, and I believe some scientists theories are questionable, including what they claim to know about the functions of the human brain.

cantbe323
Then you are more of a fool than I thought. Do you really believe that your unschooled, layman's observations can compare with years of meticulous research by professional scientists?




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2010 :  17:52:16   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by cantbe323

Our main difference is that you believe everything scientists write or say...
That's nothing more than a straw-man, personal attack.
...and I believe some scientists theories are questionable...
But you've been shown that your questions are irrelevant to the science, and so worthless to any sort of debate, yet you continue on, demonstrating that despite your claim to be here to learn, you are either incapable of learning or you're refusing to participate in good faith. Either way, the rest of us lose nothing by your absence.
...including what they claim to know about the functions of the human brain.
You haven't yet articulated even a single claim that scientists make about the functions of the human brain. The claims that you have made about this subject show that you don't know anything about what scientists actually claim. You've been given resources through which you could learn what scientists really claim, but you instead seem content with your fantasies.

If you want to be taken seriously, you could state a claim that scientists actually do make, and then state clearly and explicitly why you think that claim is wrong.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2010 :  18:24:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by cantbe323

Our main difference is that you believe everything scientists write or say...
That's nothing more than a straw-man, personal attack.
...and I believe some scientists theories are questionable...
But you've been shown that your questions are irrelevant to the science, and so worthless to any sort of debate, yet you continue on, demonstrating that despite your claim to be here to learn, you are either incapable of learning or you're refusing to participate in good faith. Either way, the rest of us lose nothing by your absence.
...including what they claim to know about the functions of the human brain.
You haven't yet articulated even a single claim that scientists make about the functions of the human brain. The claims that you have made about this subject show that you don't know anything about what scientists actually claim. You've been given resources through which you could learn what scientists really claim, but you instead seem content with your fantasies.

If you want to be taken seriously, you could state a claim that scientists actually do make, and then state clearly and explicitly why you think that claim is wrong.
Give it up, Dave. I've been plunkin' that banjo for days and days and received nothing but flat notes for the answer of it.

See, this guy hasn't the faintest idea of how to argue. He insisted that his unsupported word is sufficient for any eventuality, and that ain't hittin' on shit.

Now, there are people on these boards who's unsupported word I'll accept, most of the time, anyway, but I've known then for a long time and found them honest.

I also think he's lying like an old pot-hound on the porch in his profile.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.1 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000