Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Burning the Koran: how stupid is this?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 14

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 09/16/2010 :  12:18:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by tomk80

Justice Stephen Breyer equates burning the Koran with shouting "fire" in a crowded theater.

And Ed Brayton comments.



That's umm.... pretty fucking terrifying.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

bngbuck
SFN Addict

USA
2437 Posts

Posted - 09/16/2010 :  23:08:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bngbuck a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I wonder what Justice Antonin Scalia's opinion is? Nuclear vaporization of the Koran and all that read it?
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 09/19/2010 :  04:20:53   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
"What goes around, comes around," it is said. And there is some truth in that overly-simplistic bit of semi-logic. In the case of Jones and the Dove World Outreach Center, it's comin' 'round. Or trying to.
City puts cost of Quran-burning security at $200,000, sends bill to church

September 17, 2010 7:16 PM

The Associated Press

GAINESVILLE, Fla. — Authorities say security for last weekend's canceled Quran burning at a central Florida church cost around $200,000. City officials say they expect the church to pay.

Excellent! People should pay for their foolishness. However, like many/most ointments, there is a fly in this one.
Gainesville City Manager Russ Blackburn said he doesn't know if the city has legal authority to compel the church to pay.

Shoo fly, shoo!

But even if the billing is legal, I'd bet that the city won't see a single, cryin' dime of that money. Leaders of congregations are often notorious deadbeats -- Kent Hovind comes to mind as an extreme example.

However it turns out, I think the church has taken a major hit and it's 15 minutes of fame will cost it dearly in reputation, if not in cash. Hey Terry, you endorsed Westboro Baptist, eh? Well now you can sit yourself down in the pew right next to them, along with Pope Benny and the rest of the dregs of Christianity. Glory Hallelujah!




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 09/19/2010 :  09:33:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by bngbuck

I wonder what Justice Antonin Scalia's opinion is? Nuclear vaporization of the Koran and all that read it?

Scalia has been on the side of speech quite often as I recall.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

Machi4velli
SFN Regular

USA
854 Posts

Posted - 09/28/2010 :  01:44:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Machi4velli a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by filthy
Excellent! People should pay for their foolishness. However, like many/most ointments, there is a fly in this one.


You want to charge the church for security that (I assume) they didn't ask for? If they were billed for this, I don't see how we could not charge people at any sort of protest for the extra security provided. I mean, should they have set up a toll booth on the way to the Million Man March? Sure, they weren't being idiots and they were fighting for something worthwhile, but I'm not sure who we can have muddle around to decide which causes are worthwhile or not to decide who does and does not get billed for those expenses.

As far as I know, they wouldn't have done anything illegal by burning Korans, so if anyone became so angry by this nonsense as to actually try to harm someone, all blame goes to that person as far as I'm concerned. We cannot suspend the expectation for people in society to not attack each other over something so trivial as some fanatic burning books.

"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
-Giordano Bruno

"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge."
-Stephen Hawking

"Seeking what is true is not seeking what is desirable"
-Albert Camus
Edited by - Machi4velli on 09/28/2010 01:45:14
Go to Top of Page

chefcrsh
Skeptic Friend

Hong Kong
380 Posts

Posted - 09/28/2010 :  05:58:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send chefcrsh a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Agree. If you are a modern liberal isn't that just what the state is for...to act as a risk aggregator? Take the burning, if a church building had caught fire while they were burning this property would we not expect (given current government and laws of the land) that the state run fire department would respond to the fire, at a cost to the state (to the other taxpayers in the state)?

As a classical liberal I think they should have been allowed to do what they want with and on their own property, I don't think any security should have been provided by the state, even if requested, or at least unless it was paid for in advance. But also if it was volunteered by the state then it is the states bill to carry.
Edited by - chefcrsh on 09/28/2010 06:02:11
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 14 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.17 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000