Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Cowardly Agnostics
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 41

Officiant
Skeptic Friend

166 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  10:23:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Officiant a Private Message
Dear Dude, I consider your question meaningless drivel and so does Goggle. They gave no answer but maybe this will help you in your pursuit of lucidity.
Reality Tests - A Common Lucid Dreaming Technique | Lucid Dream ...
dreampush.com/reality-tests-a-common-lucid-dreaming-technique/ - Cached
Find more information about how to perform reality tests properly, effectively, what results ... There are a variety of ways to perform a reality test – but they're all pretty ... If you're outdoors in daylight, try making the sun set with your mind ... Go ahead and try some of the above tests and see which ones work out best for you. ...
Go to Top of Page

marfknox
SFN Die Hard

USA
3739 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  10:31:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit marfknox's Homepage  Send marfknox an AOL message Send marfknox a Private Message
Officiant:
You agnostics like to keep the door just a little bit open to the God idea.
27 pages of discussion and you still seem convinced that self-declared agnostics are only agnostics because they have some emotional attachment to the god concept. *rolls eyes*

Try this at home. Leave your door open just a little bit. Soon you will be living with rats,mice, squirrels, raccoons, snakes, birds, bats,wasps, mosquitoes, stray cats and all manner of vermin. In the same way giving a nod and waiting forever for the magical 100% proof leaves the door open wide enough for religious nuts to fly airplanes into buildings and wear suicide vests.
Mmmmm, metaphorical nonsense! Ever hear of a slippery slope argument?

"Too much certainty and clarity could lead to cruel intolerance" -Karen Armstrong

Check out my art store: http://www.marfknox.etsy.com

Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  10:39:54   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
Originally posted by Officiant

For the continuing education of all you Bible thumping agnostics.
Why I am not an Agnostic By Victor J. Stenger
www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/vstenger/not_agnostic.htm
Who is this Victor Stenger, I why should I give a toss about him?
That piece of rant you linked to, he didn't even finish his second sentence until he got it wrong.
Another Straw-man fallacy.


Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

Officiant
Skeptic Friend

166 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  11:02:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Officiant a Private Message
Dude and Kil, Agnostic philosophy in action????Is that Thomas Huxley carrying boxes of the Holy Word of God The Bible into schools?
Shutting your eyes to religious atrocities and turning off your mind to the best science is agnostic philosophy in action.
Kil. I would like to thank you for finding that great piece on agnosticism by Madalyn. You dismissed the article by informing us that O'Hair was not infallible.
That is not a logical argument because no one is infallible are they? Please read the article again and refute her arguments. Be serious for a change.
You have to admit though that the appeals to authority read like a who's who of atheism don't they? Richard Dawkins, Madalyn O'Hair, Victor Stenger,
Charles Bradlaugh, Albert Ellis, Sam Harris and even Stephan Hawking.
Dr. Mabuse doesn't know who Victor Stenger is? Crawl back in your cave.
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  11:17:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
Originally posted by Officiant

Dude and Kil, Agnostic philosophy in action????Is that Thomas Huxley carrying boxes of the Holy Word of God The Bible into schools?
Shutting your eyes to religious atrocities and turning off your mind to the best science is agnostic philosophy in action.
Kil. I would like to thank you for finding that great piece on agnosticism by Madalyn. You dismissed the article by informing us that O'Hair was not infallible.
That is not a logical argument because no one is infallible are they? Please read the article again and refute her arguments. Be serious for a change.
You have to admit though that the appeals to authority read like a who's who of atheism don't they? Richard Dawkins, Madalyn O'Hair, Victor Stenger,
Charles Bradlaugh, Albert Ellis, Sam Harris and even Stephan Hawking.
Dr. Mabuse doesn't know who Victor Stenger is? Crawl back in your cave.


Proving that Kil is right about you.

Is pathetic that you are so unschooled that you don't even comprehend the problem I'm describing to you. I think you may have invented a new fallacy of argument as well, false appeal to Google!



Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  11:21:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message
Originally posted by Officiant

Dude and Kil, Agnostic philosophy in action????Is that Thomas Huxley carrying boxes of the Holy Word of God The Bible into schools?
Shutting your eyes to religious atrocities and turning off your mind to the best science is agnostic philosophy in action.
Kil. I would like to thank you for finding that great piece on agnosticism by Madalyn. You dismissed the article by informing us that O'Hair was not infallible.
That is not a logical argument because no one is infallible are they? Please read the article again and refute her arguments. Be serious for a change.
You have to admit though that the appeals to authority read like a who's who of atheism don't they? Richard Dawkins, Madalyn O'Hair, Victor Stenger,
Charles Bradlaugh, Albert Ellis, Sam Harris and even Stephan Hawking.
Dr. Mabuse doesn't know who Victor Stenger is? Crawl back in your cave.


What's the point? No matter what I say, you will ignore it and repeat what you keep repeating. All of this has been done already. If you didn't get it the first time, why on earth would I take the time to do it again?

And yes, it is logical to say that O'hair was not infallible on the grounds that no one is infallible. I also pointed out her mistake, already. I didn't just stop at she's not infallible as you are suggesting. It's very typical of you to have ignored the meat of what I said about what she said in the post that I linked to. Also, if you agree that she was not infallible, than you should also agree that her take on agnostics might be wrong.



Also, at 27 pages, don't you think it's time for you to learn how to use the quote tags on this site? Or to at least learn to write in paragraphs? You've had a lifetime to learn that one...

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  14:21:09   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
Originally posted by Officiant

Dear Dude, I consider your question meaningless drivel and so does Goggle. They gave no answer but maybe this will help you in your pursuit of lucidity.
Reality Tests - A Common Lucid Dreaming Technique | Lucid Dream ...
dreampush.com/reality-tests-a-common-lucid-dreaming-technique/ - Cached
Find more information about how to perform reality tests properly, effectively, what results ... There are a variety of ways to perform a reality test – but they're all pretty ... If you're outdoors in daylight, try making the sun set with your mind ... Go ahead and try some of the above tests and see which ones work out best for you. ...
Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Officiant is either a complete idiot, or a professional troll.

Maybe both.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  15:24:54   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
Originally posted by Officiant

Dr. Mabuse doesn't know who Victor Stenger is? Crawl back in your cave.
So you skipped answering the question: he's such a no-body you couldn't bother a single sentece?

Then why bring him up in the first place?


Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  15:50:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
Originally posted by Officiant

For the continuing education of all you Bible thumping agnostics.
Why I am not an Agnostic By Victor J. Stenger
www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/vstenger/not_agnostic.htm
Why the appeal to authority fails: what Stenger calls an atheist, Sagan calls an agnostic. Who is right, Sagan or Stenger?

Officiant obviously approves of both of them, but only selectively. He can't be bothered to comprehend either of them. He just relies on their authority when it suits him, and he ignores it when it doesn't.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Officiant
Skeptic Friend

166 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  15:54:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Officiant a Private Message
Dear marfknox, What is a a "self declared agnostic?" I found strong,hard,closed,strict,absolute,
epistemological,mild,weak,soft,open,empirical,temporal,pragmatic and apathetic agnostics. They
are all cowards waiting for 100% proof from a sociological laboratory. Agnosticism is perpetual
procrastination.
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  16:12:25   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
Officiant, why do you care anyway? Even if agnostics are the problem you proclaim them to be, why not focus on the avowedly religious first and worry about the stragglers later? What drives your obsession with agnostics?


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  16:54:33   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message
Originally posted by Officiant

Dear marfknox, What is a a "self declared agnostic?" I found strong,hard,closed,strict,absolute,
epistemological,mild,weak,soft,open,empirical,temporal,pragmatic and apathetic agnostics. They are all cowards waiting for 100% proof from a sociological laboratory. Agnosticism is perpetual procrastination.
So what category of agnostic does this fit in to?

"My view is that if there is no evidence for it, then forget about it. An agnostic is somebody who doesn't believe in something until there is evidence for it, so I'm agnostic." – Carl Sagan

This is what you prefer:

Dogma is the established belief or doctrine held by a religion, or by extension by some other group or organization. It is authoritative and not to be disputed, doubted, or diverged from, by the practitioners or believers.

What you want Officiant is for atheism to be the flip side of the religion coin. Faith based and impervious to correction. Your brand of atheism is a religion.

And that make you the coward. You are cowardly because you will not even consider correction. You are cowardly because you own a big "T" truth, just as sure as the Catholic church does. You are the same thing. Only you pray to the "gods" of authority. And you haven't got enough sense to question them or yourself. Or you aren't brave enough to. You're right about one thing. You really aren't a skeptic. Skeptics must hold their own beliefs up to critical analysis. And you can't do that. You're just an ignorant fool of a follower just like any other religious fanatic who is so certain of their belief that they will not tolerate any other way of thinking. That's you, Officiant.


Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Officiant
Skeptic Friend

166 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  18:16:25   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Officiant a Private Message
Dear Kil, Carl Sagan is not god and he was not infallible. He also famously said, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." That is an argument from ignorance. No science is conducted without evidence. And yes, I am aware of indirect evidence.
Agnosticism is specious and traps even some otherwise intelligent people like sticky paper traps flies.
Go to Top of Page

Officiant
Skeptic Friend

166 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  18:26:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Officiant a Private Message
Dear Dr, Mabuse, Google Victor Stenger and find out just how dumb and ignorant you are. The man is a giant.
You are an oblivious worm who needs to do some basic research on the subject before bothering us further
with your ill-informed opinions.
Go to Top of Page

Officiant
Skeptic Friend

166 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2011 :  18:42:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Officiant a Private Message
Dear H. Humbert, You are not paying attention. I went back to page 1 and 2 where I already told you why agnostics are
like a cancer to the secular humanist cause.
Agnosticism is antithetical to science and is the enemy of civilization. It only serves to protect the supernatural.
from Madalyn O'Hair.
"Agnostic followers have always been allies of the church. The false notion that the world is unknowable undermines science and reinforces theology. It inclines man to faith and induces humankind to trust religious doctrines.
The church does not anathematize the agnostic and even the Roman Catholic Church will accept the agnostic in its fold.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 41 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000