Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Evolution Questions
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 19

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 10/20/2011 :  13:06:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by justintime

The video did not use a narrator. It was Dr Lovejoy describing his discovery in his own words.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Su71DLLKuQ4
No. There is a narrator. At the end he introduces himself as WSJ science columnist Robert Lee Hotz. There are clips of Lovejoy. I don't know if they are a part of an interview with this columnist or not. But there is a narrator.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 10/20/2011 :  13:17:09   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Kil

Originally posted by justintime

The video did not use a narrator. It was Dr Lovejoy describing his discovery in his own words.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Su71DLLKuQ4
No. There is a narrator. At the end he introduces himself as WSJ science columnist Robert Lee Hotz. There are clips of Lovejoy. I don't know if they are a part of an interview with this columnist or not. But there is a narrator.
Uh, yeah. How could anyone watching that not tell that there are two voices, and that the narrator voice who makes the quote is the same one that signs of at the end as a reporter for the WSJ?!?

At least own up to that justintime.
Go to Top of Page

podcat
Skeptic Friend

435 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  00:19:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send podcat a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Here's what I think is a better article on Ardi:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1927289-1,00.html

“In a modern...society, everybody has the absolute right to believe whatever they damn well please, but they don't have the same right to be taken seriously”.

-Barry Williams, co-founder, Australian Skeptics
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  00:34:08   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by podcat

Here's what I think is a better article on Ardi:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1927289-1,00.html
Yeah. A good article!

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

justintime
BANNED

382 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  07:06:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send justintime a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Good try guys. So I got you a video of Dr Lovejoy speaking directly without a narrator or second source. Here Dr Lovejoy even dares to say Darwin was wrong. Heheheheh!!!!

http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=707610096764
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  07:18:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by justintime

Here Dr Lovejoy even dares to say Darwin was wrong.
We've known that Darwin was wrong for quite some time.


- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  07:21:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by justintime

Good try guys. So I got you a video of Dr Lovejoy speaking directly without a narrator or second source. Here Dr Lovejoy even dares to say Darwin was wrong. Heheheheh!!!!

http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=707610096764
Interesting stuff, isn't it? But Lovejoy still isn't saying what you have been arguing. Actually the article that Podcat posted above is a pretty good at explaining Ardi in layman's terms.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  07:33:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by justintime

Good try guys. So I got you a video of Dr Lovejoy speaking directly without a narrator or second source. Here Dr Lovejoy even dares to say Darwin was wrong. Heheheheh!!!!

http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=707610096764
Dude: first, it's telling that you can't actually just say, "Oops-- that stuff I was attributing to Lovejoy wasn't something he actually said in that video." Most adults who want to have a serious discussion own up to mistakes.

Second: did you actually watch the video that you linked? He again says "human-like" and not "human". He also says things about Ardi, like "she lived in trees" and "she's becoming bipedal" (3:40-3:50). I don't think anyone would say that that describes humans.

We all get that Ardi is challenging some of our past views on the primate evolutionary tree, but it is simply wrong to assert that this fossil demonstrates that chimps and apes "came from humans" because Ardi was in no way a human; at best, you can say "human-like" but that's only when you're comparing Ardi to, say, a gorilla.
Go to Top of Page

justintime
BANNED

382 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  07:48:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send justintime a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Sorry about the double posting.

I don't know which group of Americans you guys belong to.

Only 40% of Americans believe in evolution. That leaves 60% who do not believe in evolution.

Now out of the 40% who do believe in evolution. America ranks 20 in the upper ranks and 27 in the lower rank in science (just behind Iceland). Average it and America is ranked 23 in the world out of 40 countries.

With this low ranking in science should even a discussion on science be encourage with Americans? What you see is what you get.

Now Americans rank 12 (high rank) and 23 (low rank)in reading skills which averages to about 18 in rank out of 40 countries just behind France. Now that is basic reading skills. Should Americans lean to read better and improve their comprehension.

Here was advice given to Americans by their own President many many years ago. Heed it!!!!

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.-- Abraham Lincoln
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  07:54:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by justintime

Sorry about the double posting.

I don't know which group of Americans you guys belong to.

Only 40% of Americans believe in evolution. That leaves 60% who do not believe in evolution.

Now out of the 40% who do believe in evolution. America ranks 20 in the upper ranks and 27 in the lower rank in science (just behind Iceland). Average it and America is ranked 23 in the world out of 40 countries.

With this low ranking in science should even a discussion on science be encourage with Americans? What you see is what you get.

Now Americans rank 12 (high rank) and 23 (low rank)in reading skills which averages to about 18 in rank out of 40 countries just behind France. Now that is basic reading skills. Should Americans lean to read better and improve their comprehension.

Here was advice given to Americans by their own President many many years ago. Heed it!!!!

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.-- Abraham Lincoln



And from a different thread where he was trying to link crime and non-belief


Link to thread


It was quite simple. 40% of Americans do not believe in evolution. So even though statistics show 75% of Americans are Christians. Only 40% are die hard Christians (true believers)

All the other stats are from Crime stats, population stats, crime distribution etc. etc.


Which one is it, justin?

You've fucked yourself on this one.

Flipped the statistics to suit your purposes.

Which statement is true?

Edited to add link

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Edited by - Valiant Dancer on 10/21/2011 07:57:26
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  07:58:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by justintime

Here Dr Lovejoy even dares to say Darwin was wrong.
We've known that Darwin was wrong for quite some time.


Right. Darwin didn't have these great fossils. So all he could do was speculate on the cause of a large brain and bipedalism. Lots of anthropologists have been wrong. Louis Leaky and the Leaky family (Richard and Mary) were wrong too. They thought a larger brain came first. Mary Leaky, who found the first Afarensis fossils, didn't want her name on the paper that Donald Johanson wrote about Lucy, and her place on the family tree, because Lucy's brain wasn't big enough to satisfy their expectation. A big insider fight between the Leaky's and Johanson ensued. Now, if you look at Lucy, she makes complete sense in light of Ardi. She's what you would expect. Ardi filled that important gap between Lucy and our last common ancestor. The Leaky's wanted the split to be farther back to give time for the development of a bigger brain. They were wrong.

Ardi is fantastic because she blows out of the water the idea that our common ancestor was more chimp like than homo. Ardi suggests a more general combination of features that means the apes evolved as much as we did, or more. So we can't look at modern apes and deduce what our ancestors looked like from them.

But you know who was right? Many anthropologists believed that bipedalism came from brachiation and clinging and leaping arboreal primates.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  08:06:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by justintime

Sorry about the double posting.

I don't know which group of Americans you guys belong to.

Only 40% of Americans believe in evolution. That leaves 60% who do not believe in evolution.

Now out of the 40% who do believe in evolution. America ranks 20 in the upper ranks and 27 in the lower rank in science (just behind Iceland). Average it and America is ranked 23 in the world out of 40 countries.

With this low ranking in science should even a discussion on science be encourage with Americans? What you see is what you get.

Now Americans rank 12 (high rank) and 23 (low rank)in reading skills which averages to about 18 in rank out of 40 countries just behind France. Now that is basic reading skills. Should Americans lean to read better and improve their comprehension.

Here was advice given to Americans by their own President many many years ago. Heed it!!!!

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.-- Abraham Lincoln

Holy crap: is English your native language? Moreover, what sort of argument are you even trying to make? Are you seriously suggesting that because a country of some 300+ million people "ranks" 23rd in the world (however valid those measures are) in science, and 18th in "reading skills" that us here at SFN shouldn't comment on science?

Never mind the utter weakness of that argument-- it's rich that you, who has done nothing but show a complete lack of reading and listening comprehension, and who has demonstrated nothing but an utter lack of scientific understanding, would try to lecture others on such things.
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  08:11:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by justintime
I don't know which group of Americans you guys belong to.

Only 40% of Americans believe in evolution. That leaves 60% who do not believe in evolution.
Take a wild guess which group we belong to. SFN is essentially a science site.
justintime
Here was advice given to Americans by their own President many many years ago. Heed it!!!!

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.-- Abraham Lincoln

I think this quote better applies to you than us, given your arguments in this debate. And because you are talking statistics, that means that you very well could be one of that lower percentage of scientific illiterates that don't live in this country.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

justintime
BANNED

382 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  09:31:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send justintime a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

Originally posted by justintime

Sorry about the double posting.

I don't know which group of Americans you guys belong to.

Only 40% of Americans believe in evolution. That leaves 60% who do not believe in evolution.

Now out of the 40% who do believe in evolution. America ranks 20 in the upper ranks and 27 in the lower rank in science (just behind Iceland). Average it and America is ranked 23 in the world out of 40 countries.

With this low ranking in science should even a discussion on science be encourage with Americans? What you see is what you get.

Now Americans rank 12 (high rank) and 23 (low rank)in reading skills which averages to about 18 in rank out of 40 countries just behind France. Now that is basic reading skills. Should Americans lean to read better and improve their comprehension.

Here was advice given to Americans by their own President many many years ago. Heed it!!!!

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.-- Abraham Lincoln



And from a different thread where he was trying to link crime and non-belief


Link to thread


It was quite simple. 40% of Americans do not believe in evolution. So even though statistics show 75% of Americans are Christians. Only 40% are die hard Christians (true believers)

All the other stats are from Crime stats, population stats, crime distribution etc. etc.


Which one is it, justin?

You've fucked yourself on this one.

Flipped the statistics to suit your purposes.

Which statement is true?

Edited to add link


If it makes you feel better. 40% of Americans believe in evolution. 75% Americans claim to be christians. But about 40% are true believers or hardline Christians.

60% of Americans do not believe in evolution.

9 out of the 10 GOP presidential candidates do not believe in evolution.

Jon Huntsman is the only GOP candidate who believes in evolution. That might explain why he is last in the polls. Anyone who believes he is a monkey will be dangerous in the White House.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2011 :  10:36:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by justintime

I don't know which group of Americans you guys belong to....
Yup. Your "theory #3" is utter garbage, and Lovejoy can't help you fix it, so it must be time for you to start flinging personal insults around instead of admitting your mistake.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 19 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.17 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000