Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 General Skepticism
 Someone loves me!!!
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 06/11/2012 :  16:04:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Convinced

Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by Convinced

People bear all responsibility for the mistakes they make if the bible is true as well.
Being responsible for a mistake means having a duty to fix it. If faith washes away sin, then there is no such duty. If faith in Christ alone assures my place in Heaven, and I develop such a faith, then why should I not lie, steal and murder?
Romans 5-7 deals with this.
Give me a synopsis, please.
unless you want to leave an offering at the altar, which is a common Christian practice these days, isn't it?
I don't understand what you are saying.
Matthew 5:23-24 reads:
Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother or sister has something against you, leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to them; then come and offer your gift.
A literal reading indicates that you are required to reconcile with others only if you wish to make an offering at temple. I was making a joke.
Christians forgive because we have been forgiven for more than has been transgressed against us by others. We see people as better than ourselves and realize it is hypocritical to have been forgiven by god and not to forgive others. The Bible says to forgive others no matter if they forgive you or no matter their reaction.
Still, the Bible only tells people to seek forgiveness from others in that one specific instance, yes?
This rarely happens with non believers.
I'd like to see the data which led you to that conclusion.
No. Catholics teach the heresey of universalism where everyone gets saved no matter what they do, even apart from Jesus.
No Catholic that I've ever known believes that. Here is an Evangelist's description of Catholic Catechism:
Question What is necessary to be saved?

Answer You have to be brought into spiritual contact with that saving death of Jesus by faith and Baptism and loyal membership in His Church, by love of God and neighbor proved by obedience to His commandments, by the other Sacraments especially Holy Communion, by prayer and good works and by final perseverance, that is, preserving God’s friendship and grace until death.
I'm doomed, according to the Catholics.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

moakley
SFN Regular

USA
1888 Posts

Posted - 06/11/2012 :  16:54:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send moakley a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Convinced

Originally posted by moakley

but he gave us sin since we are born into it. After all Mom and Dad had to get busy in order to conceive us.
Getting busy in marriage is not a sin.
That distinction, being married, is not made in Psalm 51:5

Originally posted by Convinced

How has a newborn had any opportunity of transgressing any law?
Have you ever seen a newborn get angry becasue they are simply tired? I would say that if they were 16 and reacted the same way they would punch someone out or worse.
A newborn being a newborn is a transgression against your god? Your flippant response still leaves the question unanswered. I know that the bible has stacked the deck even against newborns (Proverbs 21:15). It strikes me as unconscionable and immoral to hold a newborn, lacking in self awarenes, to the any degree of guilt.

Life is good

Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned. -Anonymous
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 06/11/2012 :  22:36:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by moakley

It strikes me as unconscionable and immoral to hold a newborn, lacking in self awarenes, to the any degree of guilt.
So true! Children must be capable of being taught their guilt first.

Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Convinced
Skeptic Friend

USA
384 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  07:44:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Convinced a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by Convinced

Romans 5-7 deals with this.
Give me a synopsis, please.

I should have said Romans 6-8. Basically says since our sin was crucified we are dead to sin. Meaning we no longer want or plan to sin. Sin no longer controls us because we are under grace and not the law. So the idea that since all our sins are taken from us and put on Jesus does not lead to sinning all the more.
Matthew 5:23-24 reads:
Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother or sister has something against you, leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to them; then come and offer your gift.
A literal reading indicates that you are required to reconcile with others only if you wish to make an offering at temple. I was making a joke.
Got it.
No Catholic that I've ever known believes that.
Here is an Evangelist's description of Catholic Catechism:
Question What is necessary to be saved?
Answer You have to be brought into spiritual contact with that saving death of Jesus by faith and Baptism and loyal membership in His Church, by love of God and neighbor proved by obedience to His commandments, by the other Sacraments especially Holy Communion, by prayer and good works and by final perseverance, that is, preserving God’s friendship and grace until death

Well the Catholic Catechism disagrees with him if you are not a Catholic. It teaches that people can be saved without belief in Jesus but seems to stop short of advocating universalism:

839: The relationship of the Church with the Jewish People. When she delves into her own mystery, the Church, the People of God in the New Covenant, discovers her link with the Jewish People,326 "the first to hear the Word of God."327 The Jewish faith, unlike other non-Christian religions, is already a response to God's revelation in the Old Covenant. To the Jews "belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ",328 "for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable."

841: The Church's relationship with the Muslims. "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day."

848: Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."

But if you’re a Catholic you need to do all those works he describes.
.

I'm doomed, according to the Catholics.
Me too.

Therefore be careful how you walk, not as unwise men but as wise, making the most of your time, because the days are evil. So then do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is. (Eph 5:15-17)
Go to Top of Page

Convinced
Skeptic Friend

USA
384 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  08:14:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Convinced a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by moakley

Originally posted by Convinced

Originally posted by moakley

but he gave us sin since we are born into it. After all Mom and Dad had to get busy in order to conceive us.
Getting busy in marriage is not a sin.
That distinction, being married, is not made in Psalm 51:5
The verse says the baby is a sinner and says nothing about the sinfulness of sex.

A newborn being a newborn is a transgression against your god? Your flippant response still leaves the question unanswered.
I was not trying to be flippant. I was honestly answering the question. All sin is a transgression against god and punishable by death. Age has nothing to do with that.

It strikes me as unconscionable and immoral to hold a newborn, lacking in self awarenes, to the any degree of guilt.
What do you base this on?


Therefore be careful how you walk, not as unwise men but as wise, making the most of your time, because the days are evil. So then do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is. (Eph 5:15-17)
Go to Top of Page

sailingsoul
SFN Addict

2830 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  10:16:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send sailingsoul a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Just another example of how screwed up the Bible is when it's used to make, reinforce or justify any talking points. Christians constantly use the Bible as though it's the Alpha and Omega in authority. Which is laughable where it condones slavery. I can say "I know I'm going going to heaven as an atheist because of Jesus who died for my sins." or say "I am without sin, for Jesus has died for then so I will have eternal life" Hallelujah! Praise God or not. I could believe my words have to be true because I can show where it says so in the Bible. What christian can deny "Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures". Weeeeee! Let go quote surfing, it so much fun and anyone can do it. Quotes to "reinforce or justify" my statements above.
Isaiah 53:5
But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed.


And here.
John 1:29
The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!

Thank you John I agree 100%, "of the world" pretty much covers me.
And here again.
1 Peter 2:24
He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed.

Cherry picking is intellectually dishonest no matter who does it. The Bible steps all over itself throughout. The Bible's only consistency is with it's inconsistencies. Even with simple facts where there should be no room for confusion, confusion abounds .

There are only two types of religious people, the deceivers and the deceived. SS
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  10:16:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Convinced

I should have said Romans 6-8. Basically says since our sin was crucified we are dead to sin. Meaning we no longer want or plan to sin. Sin no longer controls us because we are under grace and not the law. So the idea that since all our sins are taken from us and put on Jesus does not lead to sinning all the more.
Are you saying, in a "by their fruits you shall know them" sorta way, that True Christians are those who do not sin?

Also:
All sin is a transgression against god and punishable by death.
But being sinless doesn't prevent death.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  11:19:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Convinced
I should have said Romans 6-8. Basically says since our sin was crucified we are dead to sin. Meaning we no longer want or plan to sin. Sin no longer controls us because we are under grace and not the law. So the idea that since all our sins are taken from us and put on Jesus does not lead to sinning all the more.

This is so good new for me. Since I'm sin-less though Jesus Christ and can sin no more, rejecting God is no longer a problem. Once saved, always saved. I can go on being an atheist and still go to heaven. Pascal can stuff his Gambit as it has no hold on me, I can both eat the cake and save it for later.

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

Convinced
Skeptic Friend

USA
384 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  13:47:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Convinced a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by Convinced

I should have said Romans 6-8. Basically says since our sin was crucified we are dead to sin. Meaning we no longer want or plan to sin. Sin no longer controls us because we are under grace and not the law. So the idea that since all our sins are taken from us and put on Jesus does not lead to sinning all the more.
Are you saying, in a "by their fruits you shall know them" sorta way, that True Christians are those who do not sin?
No. True Christians still sin.

Also:
All sin is a transgression against god and punishable by death.
But being sinless doesn't prevent death.

Where do you get that from?

Therefore be careful how you walk, not as unwise men but as wise, making the most of your time, because the days are evil. So then do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is. (Eph 5:15-17)
Go to Top of Page

Convinced
Skeptic Friend

USA
384 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  13:57:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Convinced a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

Originally posted by Convinced
I should have said Romans 6-8. Basically says since our sin was crucified we are dead to sin. Meaning we no longer want or plan to sin. Sin no longer controls us because we are under grace and not the law. So the idea that since all our sins are taken from us and put on Jesus does not lead to sinning all the more.

This is so good new for me. Since I'm sin-less though Jesus Christ and can sin no more, rejecting God is no longer a problem. Once saved, always saved. I can go on being an atheist and still go to heaven. Pascal can stuff his Gambit as it has no hold on me, I can both eat the cake and save it for later.
I never said christians are sinless.

Ever heard of false conversion. It is a big topic in the new testament. This is why I think in America at most 20% of people that call themselves Christians are saved.

Therefore be careful how you walk, not as unwise men but as wise, making the most of your time, because the days are evil. So then do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is. (Eph 5:15-17)
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  14:10:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Convinced

True Christians still sin.
So what's the point of referencing Romans 6-8 in response to my basic question, "once saved, why not sin?" Is it that True Christians only sin accidentally? Is it the difference between seeking out temptation and merely succumbing to it?
Also:
All sin is a transgression against god and punishable by death.
But being sinless doesn't prevent death.
Where do you get that from?
You claimed Jesus was sin-free. Jesus died. Therefore, being sin-free doesn't prevent death.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  14:14:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
May 23rd.
Hello My Dear David

How are you this morning and how was your night, i hope you are in good health over there, Please my dear i am very very upset this morning because i could not read from your mail Please my dear David try and write to me because i love to read from you all the time and remember to send me your full contact information which i told you, because i am going to use it first to write the bank on your behalf and also send you the bank contact for you to make contact with the bank
Thanks
Yours Miss Hazina

Today:
Dear Hazina,

I’m sorry if I upset you. I was called away on business and didn’t have any access to my email box. One forgets how good we have it when we find ourselves suddenly standing in the middle of a frozen tundra in Alaska. No internet out their in the wild, it seems. Even my cell phone didn’t work for days on end! And you know what? It’s cold up there!

I was sent up there to find a location for a photo shoot. We’re also looking for models, if you’re at all interested. Going by the photos you sent me, you would be perfect for the job. I know that’s not why you contacted me, but there is a lot of money in modeling, just in case you’re interested.

Speaking of money, it’s been a while and I’m wondering if your offer is still on the table? (What you were asking for still confuses me. All that contact information stuff. I still don’t know what contact information you need.) Did you find someone else? How’s your cat?

Hoping this letter finds you well!

Sincerest regards,

David

David Glück
Skeptic Friends Network
www.skepticfriends.org

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  14:33:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Oh I see.
If I fail to retain my faith in Jesus, then it was a "false conversion" anyway. Nice way to dodge that bullet. My 10 years as a devout Christian in the Pentecostal church was nothing more than just a colossal waste of my time. I used to be royally pissed by the waste of time I spent in the church, and now you're telling me that if I had died, I wouldn't have gotten into heaven in the first place.
I WANT MY FUCKING MONEY BACK!

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

podcat
Skeptic Friend

435 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  14:43:22   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send podcat a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Get in line behind the 80% who believe they were saved but actually weren't, Doc. ;)

“In a modern...society, everybody has the absolute right to believe whatever they damn well please, but they don't have the same right to be taken seriously”.

-Barry Williams, co-founder, Australian Skeptics
Go to Top of Page

moakley
SFN Regular

USA
1888 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2012 :  19:09:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send moakley a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Convinced

Originally posted by moakley

Originally posted by Convinced

Originally posted by moakley

but he gave us sin since we are born into it. After all Mom and Dad had to get busy in order to conceive us.
Getting busy in marriage is not a sin.
That distinction, being married, is not made in Psalm 51:5
The verse says the baby is a sinner and says nothing about the sinfulness of sex.
Ok. I was wrong. Be fruitful and multiply. No reason for Ps 51:5 to contradict that.

Originally posted by Convinced

A newborn being a newborn is a transgression against your god? Your flippant response still leaves the question unanswered.
I was not trying to be flippant. I was honestly answering the question. All sin is a transgression against god and punishable by death. Age has nothing to do with that.

It strikes me as unconscionable and immoral to hold a newborn, lacking in self awarenes, to the any degree of guilt.
What do you base this on?
I base it on my understanding that newborns are not self aware therefore not aware of any distinction between right and wrong and by definition not capable of acts of transgression, but somehow still burdened with sin on their souls. But if David was not being overly dramatic in response to his own guilt, then the sin goes all the way back to conception. Can a zygote have a soul? Being just a clump of cells we know for sure that it has nothing resembling a nervous system. But really sin on your sole is not possible since that would contradict what Ezek 18:20 which tells us that sin is not inherited.

Life is good

Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned. -Anonymous
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.98 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000