Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Atheism Period
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 7

Doctor X
Voluntary Exile

151 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  13:16:08   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Doctor X a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Hawks

Does it have anything to do with Atheism+? Is Dave W a cult?


You will find that in my responses to the individual. I know he is not reading them. You may wish to start.

Hate to repeat myself. Most . . . unseemly.

--J.D.

His secrets are not sold cheaply.
It is perilous to waste his time.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  13:17:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Kil

There are differences of opinion in the world of skepticism over it's scope. Some keep fairly close to the science part of "scientific skepticism" while others want to widen the scope of skepticism (the brand) to include those things that can't be tested and tend to more a matter of logic while still calling it skepticism, (the brand).
Since you brought it up... the scientific-skepticism-only faction does seem to have a cultish insistence on ideological purity.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Doctor X
Voluntary Exile

151 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  13:19:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Doctor X a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Kil

No. Not really. There are differences of opinion in the world of skepticism over it's scope. Some keep fairly close to the science part of "scientific skepticism" while others want to widen the scope of skepticism (the brand) to include those things that can't be tested. . . .


That is not factionism; factionism has little to do with critical thinking.

I'm sure the same goes for factions within the PTA.


Depends on the factions. Depends, certainly on the behavior.

We are hardly cultish in our behavior.


His continued behavior demonstrates otherwise.

Well no. Because we are discussing cult behavior, it's relevant to this thread. We need a working definition.


I dislike tangents.

--J.D.


His secrets are not sold cheaply.
It is perilous to waste his time.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  14:12:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Doctor X

I dislike tangents.
Kil asked you for an operational definition of how cults behave because that behavior is fundamental to your accusations that I (or anyone who identifies with Atheism+) is exhibiting "cultish behavior," but now you declare it to be a tangent?!

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  15:22:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by On fire for Christ

Probably because of the name they chose. "+" implies superiority. When you brand yourself as "X+" the implication is that you are better than X.
Yes, activists for social justice are better than sexists, homophobes, racists, misogynists, classists, ableists, transphobes and the rest of the asswipes. Do you really want to argue against that?
Regardless of what their mission statement is, people who define themselves as X will naturally take umbridge.
Those who define themselves as just atheists shouldn't be bothered, which is what's puzzling. But here we have Cune (for example) passing a negative judgment on the label while obviously not giving enough of a shit to learn the motivation behind it. Why? Why is he expending so much effort (more than "none at all") to poo-poo something he claims to be indifferent about and which he's made clear doesn't affect him in the least little bit? It makes no sense.

Cune, you know I think you're awesome, but this is just bizarre.
Fair enough, Dave. And you're right. I guess I have seen in times past big fights about how atheists should re-brand themselves (e.g. "Brights") and figured this was something like that. I haven't read much up on it and should before I act so dismissively. My apologies.
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  15:24:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by On fire for Christ

Originally posted by Cuneiformist

I honestly don't know any atheist "misogynists, racists and homophobes" but then again, I tend not to hang out with misogynists, racists and homophobes either.



Don't know any personally or don't know of any?
Don't know any personally, of course. And really, I only know of a handful of actual atheists either personally or publicly, and can't think of anyone (off the top of my head) who fits the "misogynists, racists and homophobes" group. I'm sure there are, I'm just not up on who is.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  17:08:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Cuneiformist

Fair enough, Dave. And you're right. I guess I have seen in times past big fights about how atheists should re-brand themselves (e.g. "Brights") and figured this was something like that. I haven't read much up on it and should before I act so dismissively. My apologies.
Apologies weren't necessary, but I'm sure any of the truly active A+ers who might read this thread appreciate it.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Doctor X
Voluntary Exile

151 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  20:22:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Doctor X a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Doctor X

I dislike tangents.


I also do not waste my time with the willfully dishonest and terminally petulant.

--J.D.

His secrets are not sold cheaply.
It is perilous to waste his time.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  20:41:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Doctor X

I also do not waste my time with the willfully dishonest and terminally petulant.
Coward.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Doctor X
Voluntary Exile

151 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  20:47:22   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Doctor X a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Gentlemen do not soil themselves with the willfully dishonest and terminally petulant, of course.

That one is upset at that exposure merely underscores the responsibility for it remains his. His own words were quoted, his own misbehavior demonstrated, his worthlessness proves manifest.

For that, I am afraid there is a Cornfield into which I must consign him--the wonders of FF and Greasemonkey. Should he ever contribute something of honest maturity--even . . . dare I suggest it . . . thoughtfulness--I am sure I will receive notice of this miracle.

[Image removed for the third time (link left below) - Dave W.]

http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u264/DoctorX_photos/Lexx/Prince-Stanely-Beach.jpg

"And I have nothing more to say."

--J. "My Secrets are Not Sold Cheaply" D.

His secrets are not sold cheaply.
It is perilous to waste his time.
Edited by - Doctor X on 10/29/2012 00:19:37
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  20:52:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Doctor X

That one is upset at that exposure...
Another cowardly, hypocritical lie. Keep digging, Doctor X, keep digging.

It's really funny watching you claim to refuse to "waste your time," and then waste more time.
"And I have nothing more to say."
That'll be the day.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Doctor X
Voluntary Exile

151 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  20:53:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Doctor X a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I am sure with whatever tantrum the individual spewed, it proved most epically embarrassing.

In that, he remains consistent.

And some question why his behavior resembles that of a cult.

Curious.

--J.D.

His secrets are not sold cheaply.
It is perilous to waste his time.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  21:01:25   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Doctor X

I am sure with whatever tantrum the individual spewed, it proved most epically embarrassing.

In that, he remains consistent.

And some question why his behavior resembles that of a cult.

Curious.
And you waste still more time after indicating that you had nothing more to say.

Bwahahahahaha!

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  21:20:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
 Moderation Notice 

Doctor X: Please find a smaller version of that image (less than 640 pixels across). There's no good reason to post such a large graphic. Our members are not all using high-res monitors, and the large image forces them to scroll horizontally to read the text in the comments. By reverting the edit I made earlier, you're no longer confining your hatred to me personally, but inflicting collateral damage.


- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 10/28/2012 :  22:58:08   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Doctor X

I am sure with whatever tantrum the individual spewed, it proved most epically embarrassing.

In that, he remains consistent.

And some question why his behavior resembles that of a cult.

Curious.

--J.D.
Tantrums are cultish behavior? That is curious. Or is consistency the cultish behavior? But that doesn't seem right either.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 7 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000