|
|
sailingsoul
SFN Addict
2830 Posts |
Posted - 08/09/2016 : 18:02:53 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse
Originally posted by sailingsoul
Anyone see a pattern here with this first post and other first posts from new members?
|
Well, the formatting is unusually cruel to us. To me, at least.
| Gee, ya think? Funny reply! However it's not what I was asking about. I was asking about this, "and other first posts from new members" lately.
What I've been noticing and was asking about was is it courious that Skeptic girl 00 has yet to actually join the conversation on a topic she desired to discuss enough to go out of her way to join and then start? Am I the only one who sees, you know because I prefer reading with my eye's open, a recent repetition of "new mewmber's" starting OP's yet failing to join the conversation or interact with those who take the time to reply. Not that it's polite to hijack a thread, it didn't seem Skeptic girl 00 would mind, after not bothering to reply even once to all those who have replied to "her". |
There are only two types of religious people, the deceivers and the deceived. SS |
|
|
On fire for Christ
SFN Regular
Norway
1273 Posts |
Posted - 08/09/2016 : 18:07:12 [Permalink]
|
this board has been on life support for a decade but it's pretty sad when new users and topics are immediately under suspicion.
|
|
|
|
Kil
Evil Skeptic
USA
13477 Posts |
Posted - 08/10/2016 : 08:01:26 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by sailingsoul
What I've been noticing and was asking about was is it courious that Skeptic girl 00 has yet to actually join the conversation on a topic she desired to discuss enough to go out of her way to join and then start? Am I the only one who sees, you know because I prefer reading with my eye's open, a recent repetition of "new mewmber's" starting OP's yet failing to join the conversation or interact with those who take the time to reply. Not that it's polite to hijack a thread, it didn't seem Skeptic girl 00 would mind, after not bothering to reply even once to all those who have replied to "her".
|
We have always had hit and runs. We become concerned when the posts are spam. Some early posts are a set up for spam, but we leave them to make sure. Once spam happens, we deal with it.
|
Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.
Why not question something for a change?
Genetic Literacy Project |
|
|
Kil
Evil Skeptic
USA
13477 Posts |
Posted - 08/10/2016 : 08:04:14 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by On fire for Christ
this board has been on life support for a decade but it's pretty sad when new users and topics are immediately under suspicion.
| A decade?
And yes. Social media has taken its toll on us. Things change. |
Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.
Why not question something for a change?
Genetic Literacy Project |
|
|
Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend
Sweden
9688 Posts |
Posted - 08/11/2016 : 12:28:21 [Permalink]
|
Still, Snitz forum is much more conductive to written debate and such, compared to facebook. And... we can format our text to give it more emphasis. |
Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..." Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3
"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse
Support American Troops in Iraq: Send them unarmed civilians for target practice.. Collateralmurder. |
|
|
Kil
Evil Skeptic
USA
13477 Posts |
Posted - 08/11/2016 : 16:46:26 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse
Still, Snitz forum is much more conductive to written debate and such, compared to facebook. And... we can format our text to give it more emphasis.
| Right. |
Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.
Why not question something for a change?
Genetic Literacy Project |
|
|
sailingsoul
SFN Addict
2830 Posts |
Posted - 08/11/2016 : 17:26:24 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by On fire for Christ
this board has been on life support for a decade but it's pretty sad when new users and topics are immediately under suspicion.
| Oooh I put Skeptic girl 00 "immediately under suspicion"[/i][/b]
Ummm, I happen to notice the topic had gone a full page, with 15 replies not responded to before I asked a question about that and how it seems to be have occurred with other first time posters of late. You haven't noticed? I presume not.
|
There are only two types of religious people, the deceivers and the deceived. SS |
|
|
sailingsoul
SFN Addict
2830 Posts |
Posted - 08/11/2016 : 17:41:04 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Kil
Hits and runs are one thinng We have always had hit and runs. We become concerned when the posts are spam. Some early posts are a set up for spam, but we leave them to make sure. Once spam happens, we deal with it.
| Hit and runs or spam are different two things. I'm questioning if this is something else which seems to be occurring over again. evident with outher first time members. Which is appears evident evident to me. If nobody has picked up on this or cares not to discuss this, than there is nothing to discuss. |
There are only two types of religious people, the deceivers and the deceived. SS |
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
|
On fire for Christ
SFN Regular
Norway
1273 Posts |
Posted - 08/14/2016 : 19:13:59 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by sailingsoul
Oooh I put Skeptic girl 00 "immediately under suspicion"[/i][/b]
|
Yeah you pretty much did that. It's the kind of paranoid behaviour I expect from gun-nuts. |
|
|
|
sailingsoul
SFN Addict
2830 Posts |
Posted - 08/14/2016 : 22:14:29 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by On fire for Christ
Originally posted by sailingsoul
Oooh I put Skeptic girl 00 "immediately under suspicion"[/i][/b]
|
Yeah you pretty much did that. It's the kind of paranoid behaviour I expect from gun-nuts.
| Open your eyes you blind religious-nut, you obviously missed the rest of my comment which explained why the usage of "immediatey" in your comment is another delusion you hold.
Ummm, I happen to notice the topic had gone a full page, with 15 replies not responded to before I asked a question about that and how it seems to be have occurred with other first time posters of late. You haven't noticed? I presume not.
| That spells out why I wasn't immediately jumping on anyone. Can you see that now? Open your eyes and stop making shit up because your in the dark.
As far as me being a gun-nut, I don't presently own any guns because I choose not to. That right there disqualifies me as being a gun-nut from any possible defination besides your's. If you didn't rely on making up your own definitions to support your arguments you wouldn't be able to defend your beliefs. Agreeing with Constitution and the Second Amendment does not make anyone a gun-nut which hasn't got a snowball's chance in your delusional hell of being repealed anytime soon. |
There are only two types of religious people, the deceivers and the deceived. SS |
|
|
On fire for Christ
SFN Regular
Norway
1273 Posts |
Posted - 08/15/2016 : 23:36:47 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by sailingsoul
Open your eyes you blind religious-nut, you obviously missed the rest of my comment which explained why the usage of "immediatey" [sic] in your comment is another delusion you hold.
That spells out why I wasn't immediately jumping on anyone. Can you see that now? Open your eyes and stop making shit up because your[sic] in the dark. |
OK so we're ignoring your first post, I guess, where you suggest a pattern with new users? Was that unrelated? If so, please reveal the other pattern you were talking about originally.
As far as me being a gun-nut, I don't presently own any guns because I choose not to. That right there disqualifies me as being a gun-nut from any possible defination [sic] besides your's [sic]. If you didn't rely on making up your own definitions to support your arguments you wouldn't be able to defend your beliefs. Agreeing with Constitution and the Second Amendment does not make anyone a gun-nut which hasn't got a snowball's chance in your delusional hell of being repealed anytime soon.
|
Your last sentence is a bit confusing, because you seemed to have smashed two competing ideas together in some kind of frenzy/rage... but I think you're suggesting that the 2nd amendment won't be repealed. You're probably right, there are too many gun nuts in America for that to ever happen, unfortunately. |
|
|
|
|
|