|
|
|
ergo123
BANNED
USA
810 Posts |
Posted - 10/10/2006 : 18:04:18 [Permalink]
|
| And you think the official conspiracy theory stands up to the Razor? That's a funny one. |
No witty quotes. I think for myself. |
 |
|
|
Kil
Evil Skeptic
USA
13481 Posts |
Posted - 10/10/2006 : 18:13:55 [Permalink]
|
And suggesting that the dingle berries who are now running the country could pull off what you suggest is even funnier…
And yes, the Razor. It is you who is adding to the equation an unnecessary component to bring down the buildings…
|
Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.
Why not question something for a change?
Genetic Literacy Project |
|
|
|
ergo123
BANNED
USA
810 Posts |
 Posted - 10/10/2006 : 18:29:52 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by Kil
And suggesting that the dingle berries who are now running the country could pull off what you suggest is even funnier…
And yes, the Razor. It is you who is adding to the equation an unnecessary component to bring down the buildings…
Have you ever read anything about the Bush family history? The current administration is no bunch of dingle berries. They might act inept, but they are very good at directing and misdirecting the public's attention. |
No witty quotes. I think for myself. |
| Edited by - ergo123 on 10/10/2006 21:21:07 |
|
|
|
Kil
Evil Skeptic
USA
13481 Posts |
Posted - 10/10/2006 : 19:58:41 [Permalink]
|
quote:
ergo123:
They might act inept, but they are very good at diescting and misdirecting the public's attention.
Apparently, this particular Bush uses stupidity as misdirection. Very clever indeed…
|
Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.
Why not question something for a change?
Genetic Literacy Project |
|
|
|
ergo123
BANNED
USA
810 Posts |
Posted - 10/10/2006 : 21:22:49 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by Kil
quote:
ergo123:
They might act inept, but they are very good at directing and misdirecting the public's attention.
Apparently, this particular Bush uses stupidity as misdirection. Very clever indeed…
Stupidity doesn't get you into the white house. |
No witty quotes. I think for myself. |
| Edited by - ergo123 on 10/10/2006 21:23:37 |
|
|
|
Kil
Evil Skeptic
USA
13481 Posts |
Posted - 10/10/2006 : 21:33:04 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Stupidity doesn't get you into the white house.
Not stupidity alone. But stupidity with connections might do the job. I understand why you have a need to have him be smarter than he appears to be…
|
Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.
Why not question something for a change?
Genetic Literacy Project |
|
|
|
ergo123
BANNED
USA
810 Posts |
Posted - 10/10/2006 : 21:52:46 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by Kil
quote:
Stupidity doesn't get you into the white house.
Not stupidity alone. But stupidity with connections might do the job. I understand why you have a need to have him be smarter than he appears to be…
And what is that understanding? I certainly don't think he had much to do with the events of 9-11-01, even in the theory that makes the most sense to me. He is a good political tactician but not a real strategist. |
No witty quotes. I think for myself. |
|
|
|
Kil
Evil Skeptic
USA
13481 Posts |
Posted - 10/10/2006 : 22:00:14 [Permalink]
|
quote:
ergo123
He is a good political tactician but not a real strategist.
Carl Rove is a good tactician. Bush is really more like Chance the Gardener.
|
Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.
Why not question something for a change?
Genetic Literacy Project |
|
|
|
Master Yoda
Skeptic Friend
59 Posts |
Posted - 10/11/2006 : 02:19:54 [Permalink]
|
Ergo,
I don't truly know that you're TS1234, but I highly suspect it. And I know far too many technically savvy people to think that the IP address being different proves anything. All you need is one or more of the following:
A separate proxy server.
A separate location/PC.
A separate email account.
Good knowledge of how to get around the IP check. I know a guy who's been booted from Loose Change about nine times under nine different names and locations, and he never leaves his own computer, just channels through other proxies.
I prefer to watch and wait. I've sealed some predictions that only myself and Sylvia Browne are aware of. I'll trot 'em out every time you show another indication. And even so, it might be nice if you're not TS1234... It would mean you guys are getting to the bottom of the barrel and are becoming so predictable that you all sound the like the same idjit. |
|
|
|
ergo123
BANNED
USA
810 Posts |
Posted - 10/11/2006 : 02:32:14 [Permalink]
|
| Whatever turns you on... |
No witty quotes. I think for myself. |
|
|
|
tomk80
SFN Regular
Netherlands
1278 Posts |
Posted - 10/11/2006 : 07:02:16 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by ergo123
quote:
Originally posted by tomk80
quote:
Originally posted by ergo123
yeah, i guess you're right ; there can only be one way to set up a cd in this universe... i suppose it would be impossible to set it up any other way... here you go dave; another one for the closed-mind pile.
Please explain, oh great and open-minded individual to whom we should bow in our ignorance, what is the sense of setting of explosions after the building starts collapsing?
How do you make the building collapse without igniting the explosions first in the first place?
You don't set off all the explosives at the same time. You use some to start the top moving. Then, you use the rest to make sure the whole building collapses, and all the people who might have seen or heard something they shouldn't have, die. What you are left with is called 'shock and awe.'
Man, your fantasy world really knows no bounds, does it? |
Tom
`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
-Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Caroll- |
|
|
|
pleco
SFN Addict
USA
2998 Posts |
Posted - 10/11/2006 : 07:13:23 [Permalink]
|
quote:
You don't set off all the explosives at the same time. You use some to start the top moving. Then, you use the rest to make sure the whole building collapses, and all the people who might have seen or heard something they shouldn't have, die. What you are left with is called 'shock and awe.'
But if we ask for any evidence to back this up, you refuse. Correct? Just making sure I understand your rules. |
by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart. |
|
| Edited by - pleco on 10/11/2006 07:14:22 |
|
|
|
Starman
SFN Regular
Sweden
1613 Posts |
 Posted - 10/11/2006 : 07:21:57 [Permalink]
|
Rules? He don't need no stinking rules.
 |
|
|
|
ergo123
BANNED
USA
810 Posts |
Posted - 10/11/2006 : 08:25:51 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by pleco
quote:
You don't set off all the explosives at the same time. You use some to start the top moving. Then, you use the rest to make sure the whole building collapses, and all the people who might have seen or heard something they shouldn't have, die. What you are left with is called 'shock and awe.'
But if we ask for any evidence to back this up, you refuse. Correct? Just making sure I understand your rules.
I wish I knew a way to make this clear to all of you. I'm not against providing evidence for the CD conspiracy theory. I just want to see if the official conspiracy theory is on weak-enough ground before I spend time on making a case for the CD conspiracy theory. As I have admitted here, my current belief in the CD theory is based on intuition--a gut feeling. This gut feeling is based largely on my impression that official story doesn't add up.
But if I am satisfied that the official theory has been validated, I'll drop the CD theory as my working theory. If the official theory is not validated to my satisfaction, I'll examine the CD theory (while remaining open to a) new info/support for the official theory and b) new theories that arise).
If, after examining the available info/support on the CD theory, I find it to be sufficiently validated, I will present my case for it. If I find the existing support for the CD theory to be lacking, I will search for a 3rd theory.
Contrary to apparent opinion here, I am not just looking to prove the CD theory based on my intuition. I'm describing my entire search for truth process. It happend to be very methodical--but involves use of my brain; and I listen to the part of my brain that generates intuitive hypotheses. These intuitive hypotheses are not always correct--so I don't just accept what my intuition tells me as Truth. But I also don't just ignore my intuition. Very often my intuition is correct, or leads me to the correct answer after I explore the direction it points me in.
I'm not sure what other words to use to explain my process here. And maybe you really do understand it as I've described it. But if you do, I cannot understand why you constantly bring up the CD theory and my refusal to discuss it at this point in time.
Maybe it's your way of telling me you have no independent support for the official theory. If so, just admit it and we can move on to the CD theory. |
No witty quotes. I think for myself. |
|
|
|
ergo123
BANNED
USA
810 Posts |
Posted - 10/11/2006 : 08:27:40 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by tomk80
quote:
Originally posted by ergo123
quote:
Originally posted by tomk80
quote:
Originally posted by ergo123
yeah, i guess you're right ; there can only be one way to set up a cd in this universe... i suppose it would be impossible to set it up any other way... here you go dave; another one for the closed-mind pile.
Please explain, oh great and open-minded individual to whom we should bow in our ignorance, what is the sense of setting of explosions after the building starts collapsing?
How do you make the building collapse without igniting the explosions first in the first place?
You don't set off all the explosives at the same time. You use some to start the top moving. Then, you use the rest to make sure the whole building collapses, and all the people who might have seen or heard something they shouldn't have, die. What you are left with is called 'shock and awe.'
Man, your fantasy world really knows no bounds, does it?
What part of my rather simple and admittedly speculative explanation do you find enters the realm of fantasy? |
No witty quotes. I think for myself. |
|
|
 |
|
Just to be clear...
Topic Locked
