Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Conspiracy Theories
 Molten metal
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 14

ergo123
BANNED

USA
810 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  17:15:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ergo123 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.

quote:
Originally posted by ergo123

I've already told you cunie, the point was to establish the molten metal as observed evidence.
quote:
When are you going to begin to accept "yes" answers?


I already have Dave. I'm not sure why folks haven't moved on. But they keep posting...

[quote] When are you going to move on to the next evidenciary step?



I'm working on it.

No witty quotes. I think for myself.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  17:23:31   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote


Pouring bronze



Casting removed from the investment.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  17:27:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ergo123

quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.

quote:
Originally posted by ergo123

I've already told you cunie, the point was to establish the molten metal as observed evidence.
When are you going to begin to accept "yes" answers?


I already have Dave. I'm not sure why folks haven't moved on. But they keep posting...

quote:
When are you going to move on to the next evidenciary step?

I'm working on it.
Well there was a time when you tsk-tsked people for not staying on topic. If people keep posting things that are irrelevant, why not ignore them and simply state that we're moving on?
Go to Top of Page

ergo123
BANNED

USA
810 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  18:15:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ergo123 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Master Yoda

Ergo, do I have to use little piles of pooh-pooh?


I don't know. I'm not the boss of you. I just feel compelled to use the emoticons with someone who calls himself "Master Yoda"...


quote:
Ergo, you're not looking for answers. You're looking for support of your doctrinaire view. We accept that there are some "yes" answers, some "no" answers, and still a few "maybe" answers.


Of course I'm looking for answers. But I'm looking for reasoned answers. Just saying "well that seems unrealistic," is not a reasoned answer.


quote:
You want a single authoritative site with all the answers. There is none.


Yes, I know that. I'm not looking for any one site or source to have all the answers. Wanting a site to have just one answer is hardly wanting it to have all the answers. Why do you exaggerate what I'm looking for like that?

quote:
No one's written the Big Book of 9/11, yet.
And I dont expect anyone to in my lifetime.

quote:
One "Yes". There was molten METAL at GZ. So what?!?! Where does that lead you?


Does it have to lead somewhere? Is that the rule? One can only ask question about something they know will lead somewhere? If that is your rule, you will never get anywhere new.


quote:
Please explain how that supports your OP, which I've asked you to do time and again, already. How does "really hot" equate to "must've been explosives"? We're waiting.


It doesn't, directly. There need to be steps in between. As I've pointed out before, time and again, this first step was establishing the molten metal was there. One can't very well link molten metal to explosives or a.r.sbeing used if the molten metal was not there, right?


No witty quotes. I think for myself.
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  18:23:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message  Reply with Quote

quote:
quote:
One "Yes". There was molten METAL at GZ. So what?!?! Where does that lead you?

Does it have to lead somewhere? Is that the rule? One can only ask question about something they know will lead somewhere? If that is your rule, you will never get anywhere new.
quote:
Please explain how that supports your OP, which I've asked you to do time and again, already. How does "really hot" equate to "must've been explosives"? We're waiting.

It doesn't, directly. There need to be steps in between. As I've pointed out before, time and again, this first step was establishing the molten metal was there. One can't very well link molten metal to explosives or a.r.sbeing used if the molten metal was not there, right?

So you are asking random questions that lead no where and are not intended to prove or disprove you belief.
I have a questions for you.

Are you retarded?



If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

Master Yoda
Skeptic Friend

59 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  18:53:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Master Yoda a Private Message  Reply with Quote
You know, Ergo, you really are a punk. This is like schoolyard debating, and you're getting your ass kicked every time you resort to stupid tactics. That's about the third time you've referred to my screen name as though it mean something significant. That like schoolyard taunting.... "Randy? Heh heh heh? Are you always horny?" "Hey Four Eyes!" "Yadda yadda yadda!"

Do you really think that H. Humbert is a character in a Nabakov novel, or that Filthy is really really dirty and grungy. (Hey, Filthy - I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here... )

If you'd read through the forums you'd have seen the post where I explained my screen name in passing, and a very innnocent explanation it is, too. (Hint: I'm neither 130 cm tall, nor 412 years old. Really! I swear!)

What, you think because you can take one word out of a quote from Rene Descartes that we're going to actually think you're a philosopher? Let's have a quick vote... Everyone who thinks that Ergo123 is the logical successor to Thomas Aquinas, please step forward. Don't be shy.... Step right up. Golly, no takers, Ergo. Is there a possibility that your screen name is not really you? Gasp! Shudder! What will we do?
Interesting that you chose the "ergo" portion... and not the "I think" nor the "I am".... you chose a conjunction as your screen-name. Whooooo! High fives all around, gotcha there! You're a con-junk-shun, har har har! I'll shun you 'cuz you're conning us with your junk! Get it? Huh? Wink wink, nudge nudge!

So, get back to your preposterous non-theory, please. (Don't cut and respond to the above, .... it was meant to be a totally exaggerated derail!)

You're running out of pages here, and haven't yet postulated just what the dangnabbed molten metal has to do with linking your brilliant logic to a new - just announced about two messages ago - middle area that will then lead to another area that will then lead to proof of explosives! You gave us eight little quotes, we agree that there could've been some sort of molten metal, and.......

.... we're just on pins and needles, fella! Where's it going?
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  19:16:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ergo123

I already have Dave. I'm not sure why folks haven't moved on. But they keep posting...
It's because you failed to answer. You argued with 'yes' answers on at least three occassions. You can't seem to bear people agreeing with you as much as you can't stand it when people disagree with you.
quote:
I'm working on it.
Do tell.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

ergo123
BANNED

USA
810 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  20:26:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ergo123 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by furshur


quote:
quote:
One "Yes". There was molten METAL at GZ. So what?!?! Where does that lead you?

Does it have to lead somewhere? Is that the rule? One can only ask question about something they know will lead somewhere? If that is your rule, you will never get anywhere new.
quote:
Please explain how that supports your OP, which I've asked you to do time and again, already. How does "really hot" equate to "must've been explosives"? We're waiting.

It doesn't, directly. There need to be steps in between. As I've pointed out before, time and again, this first step was establishing the molten metal was there. One can't very well link molten metal to explosives or a.r.sbeing used if the molten metal was not there, right?

So you are asking random questions that lead no where and are not intended to prove or disprove you belief.
I have a questions for you.

Are you retarded?






I ask questions. Sometimes they lead to interesting answers. Sometimes they don't. If you only ask questions that you know the answer to, you don't learn anything.

No witty quotes. I think for myself.
Go to Top of Page

ergo123
BANNED

USA
810 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  20:40:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ergo123 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Master Yoda

You know, Ergo, you really are a punk. This is like schoolyard debating, and you're getting your ass kicked every time you resort to stupid tactics. That's about the third time you've referred to my screen name as though it mean something significant.


If you don't realize that a chosen name is revealing, then you weren't paying attention in psych 101.

quote:
Do you really think that H. Humbert is a character in a Nabakov novel, or that Filthy is really really dirty and grungy. (Hey, Filthy - I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here... )


No, I'm not that literal...

quote:
If you'd read through the forums you'd have seen the post where I explained my screen name in passing, and a very innnocent explanation it is, too. (Hint: I'm neither 130 cm tall, nor 412 years old. Really! I swear!)


Hmm. The name is a little bit of a sore spot, eh? Don't humiliate yourself further by defending it, for cripe's sake.

quote:
What, you think because you can take one word out of a quote from Rene Descartes that we're going to actually think you're a philosopher?


Not a bit. That's not what it's a reference to. It's part of the name of the company I work for. I do most of these posts from work, so I thought it only fitting...

quote:
You're running out of pages here, and haven't yet postulated just what the dangnabbed molten metal has to do with linking your brilliant logic to a new - just announced about two messages ago - middle area that will then lead to another area that will then lead to proof of explosives!


As I said many times before, I don't know what this evidence will lead to. It might lead to the proof of explosives and/or a.r.; but it might not. You see, while I can't escape perceiving a particular theory as being the most likely, I can be objective and follow the evidence where it leads--no matter where it leads. Maybe it's easier for me to do because that's how I earn my living.


No witty quotes. I think for myself.
Go to Top of Page

ergo123
BANNED

USA
810 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  20:41:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ergo123 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.

quote:
Originally posted by ergo123

I already have Dave. I'm not sure why folks haven't moved on. But they keep posting...
It's because you failed to answer. You argued with 'yes' answers on at least three occassions. You can't seem to bear people agreeing with you as much as you can't stand it when people disagree with you.
quote:
I'm working on it.
Do tell.



Where did I argue against someone agreeing with me!?

No witty quotes. I think for myself.
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  20:42:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ergo123
I ask questions. Sometimes they lead to interesting answers. Sometimes they don't. If you only ask questions that you know the answer to, you don't learn anything.

You're the living proof that even if you're getting answers it doesn't necessarily mean you're capable of learning.

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

ergo123
BANNED

USA
810 Posts

Posted - 10/23/2006 :  22:08:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ergo123 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

quote:
Originally posted by ergo123
I ask questions. Sometimes they lead to interesting answers. Sometimes they don't. If you only ask questions that you know the answer to, you don't learn anything.

You're the living proof that even if you're getting answers it doesn't necessarily mean you're capable of learning.



Snap!

No witty quotes. I think for myself.
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 10/24/2006 :  11:29:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ergo123
If you don't realize that a chosen name is revealing, then you weren't paying attention in psych 101.





Edited to add:
It's some kind of mental slip of mine that almost always make me type Error instead of Ergo. The similarities are too great to be ignored, and certainly explains Ergo's choice of name.

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Edited by - Dr. Mabuse on 10/24/2006 11:33:27
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 10/24/2006 :  12:10:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote


Diagram of a bloomery. Bloomeries are the most ancient of blast furnace designs. Iron smelting is known to date back to around 3,000 BCE , but the redsmiths (bronze workers) of the day found iron difficult and cranky to work, so bloomeries actually came into common use rather later.

The name comes from the iron “bloom” they produce. Called “sponge iron” it is porous, and is riddled with slag. Before using it for anything beyond a doorstop, it must be reheated to a malleable state and the slag forged out. From there, it is either “grey” (cast) or “wrought” (ductile) iron. A great deal of ornamental iron work such as window grilles and, well, doorstops, is made from grey iron.

Grey iron is soft and brittle, and therefore useless for anything that must take any stress. Ductile iron, on the other hand, is strong and easily forged into tools and implements. It was the industrial standard before the advent of low carbon steels, and high carbon steels became easier to produce, and later, by alloying, various other steels such as stainless.

Sponge iron, from the oxides in ore, does not require melting temperatures as high as pig iron.

But back to the bloomery. Basically, a bloomery is little more than a chimney with holes in the bottom. They can be drafted naturally, by bellows, or, more commonly for ancient ones, simply by a large hole facing the prevailing wind. For that reason many bloomeries were built on hilltops. They were fired with charcoal.

To smelt with a bloomery, the iron ore first must be heated to remove all moisture, and a charcoal fire built in the bottom. Then the ore, crushed into small chunks, is mixed about 50/50 with charcoal by volume, and some 10% crushed limestone added as a flux to keep the slag to a minimum. When the fire in the bottom is good and hot, the ore/charcoal/lime is added through the top and the melt begins. At this point, the draft must be carefully controlled, If it gets too hot, the bloom will absorb too much carbon. As the bloom forms, it trickles out through the holes, called tuyères, in the bottom of the bloomery. Sometimes, after the smelt, earthen bloomeries were simply torn down to get the iron. Even the slag from the smelt was saved to be re-smelted, as it still contained a little ore.

Bloomeries, the most venerable of foundry equipment, are still in use today in various parts of the world, and are sometimes used, in smaller versions, by artisans and hobbyists.





"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 10/24/2006 :  12:12:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse
It's some kind of mental slip of mine that almost always make me type Error instead of Ergo. The similarities are too great to be ignored, and certainly explains Ergo's choice of name.
But what does that mean when he keeps writing "cunie" instead of cune?
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 14 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.2 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000