Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 Dictarorial powers for the Pres?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 05/30/2007 :  11:59:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Cuneiformist

Well, he wasn't in the White House. The Veep lives at No. 1 Observatory Circle.
But he works in the West Wing of the White House.

ETA: or doesn't work, depending on your point-of-view.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Original_Intent
SFN Regular

USA
609 Posts

Posted - 05/30/2007 :  14:38:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Original_Intent a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Jerome:

Yes, the GOP went after Clinton, as well they should. And yes, the DEMS are after Bush, as well they should.

It really isn't the person so much as the process anymore. Continuingly pandering and propping up the curropt process leads to curropt results.. It's like a see-saw, One party's leaders and their followers on each side. Only instead of one set of leaders jumping off, they both jump off and yank the support out from under their followers.

Peace
Joe
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 05/30/2007 :  14:47:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by Cuneiformist

Well, he wasn't in the White House. The Veep lives at No. 1 Observatory Circle.
But he works in the West Wing of the White House.

ETA: or doesn't work, depending on your point-of-view.
Well, I'm sure GHWB worked. Cheney schemes.
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 05/30/2007 :  19:03:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Why not an answer to the statements as opposed to the jokes.

Does this subject challenge your comfort zones?

You guys seemed very comfortable with discussions of other topics.


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 05/30/2007 :  20:26:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Why not an answer to the statements as opposed to the jokes.

Does this subject challenge your comfort zones?

You guys seemed very comfortable with discussions of other topics.


As I noted above, experts from various sources argue that the document seems to be fairly routine, and not the power-grab initially thought. Quit being self-righteous. It makes you look like an asshole.
Edited by - Cuneiformist on 05/30/2007 21:19:55
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 05/30/2007 :  23:25:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The whitehouse having f b i files illegally is "fairly routine"; come on you have got to be kidding.


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000