Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 Sicko
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 13

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  08:26:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

How is the free exchange of service between a doctor and a patient not liberty?
The idea that all such exchanges will be equal is unreasonably idealistic. What should a doctor do in the case of the homeless, jobless guy who requires several thousand dollars in emergency surgery after being hit by a car? Let him die? What if the doctor doesn't know the guy is homeless and jobless?

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  08:33:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

How is the free exchange of service between a doctor and a patient not liberty?
The idea that all such exchanges will be equal is unreasonably idealistic. What should a doctor do in the case of the homeless, jobless guy who requires several thousand dollars in emergency surgery after being hit by a car? Let him die? What if the doctor doesn't know the guy is homeless and jobless?


Many doctors would choose to do pro bono work much like lawyers. In fact we see examples of this all the time.

Liberty is not equality. The idea of equality is idealistic.




What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  08:38:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Many doctors would choose to do pro bono work much like lawyers. In fact we see examples of this all the time.
Being forced to do pro bono work is not liberty.
Liberty is not equality. The idea of equality is idealistic.
How could the idea that some people shouldn't have equal liberty be liberty?

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  08:44:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Many doctors would choose to do pro bono work much like lawyers. In fact we see examples of this all the time.
Being forced to do pro bono work is not liberty.
Liberty is not equality. The idea of equality is idealistic.
How could the idea that some people shouldn't have equal liberty be liberty?


Pro bono work by definition is not forced.

What is your understanding of liberty?


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  08:50:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message  Reply with Quote
What do you mean by "This is not your money"?



Read what I wrote and think about it, rather than listening to the noises in your head.

I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  08:53:48   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Gorgo

What do you mean by "This is not your money"?



Read what I wrote and think about it, rather than listening to the noises in your head.


It sounds like you believe that all things truly belong to all people. Do you understand that communism is a proven failure?


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  09:01:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message  Reply with Quote
It sounds like you believe that all things truly belong to all people. Do you understand that communism is a proven failure?


Again, you're listening to your beliefs, rather than looking at what people write and responding to that. Where does it say that I "believe that all things truly belong to all people," and there fore "I believe" in what you think communism is?

What I said is that this thing that you call your money, is not your money IN THIS SOCIETY, not some fictional society that you were taught existed, and is now extinct.

I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  09:23:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Gorgo

It sounds like you believe that all things truly belong to all people. Do you understand that communism is a proven failure?


Again, you're listening to your beliefs, rather than looking at what people write and responding to that. Where does it say that I "believe that all things truly belong to all people," and there fore "I believe" in what you think communism is?

What I said is that this thing that you call your money, is not your money IN THIS SOCIETY, not some fictional society that you were taught existed, and is now extinct.


I am trying to understand you.

In this society:

What is money?

Who owns this money?

Who owns the profit of your labor?


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  09:27:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Pro bono work by definition is not forced.
Then tell me what a doctor in an emergency room should do if presented with an unconscious guy with no wallet who needs several thousand dollars of care. If he patches up the guy, only to find out later that the patient has no ability to pay the bill (even if willing), then the doctor has been forced to do his work for free.

Lawyers always know ahead of time that they're doing pro bono work. Doctors have no such ability to be fully informed.
What is your understanding of liberty?
Politically or philosophically?

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  09:41:49   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message  Reply with Quote

I am trying to understand you.

In this society:

What is money?

Who owns this money?

Who owns the profit of your labor?




I doubt that we really have much disagreement on the first point, so unless you wanted to come up with a definition that makes some point, I'll assume you weren't really asking for a definition of money.

The point isn't who owns the money so much as who controls the money, and that tends to be them that's got it.

Again, there is not just one method for obtaining that control. As I've stated, and which you seem to ignore, one such method of creating poverty is the Federal Reserve. There are many others. One is the war against the people of Iraq.

As to the last point, labor has little to do with money. It has more to do with race, gender and genetics.

I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  09:45:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Then tell me what a doctor in an emergency room should do if presented with an unconscious guy with no wallet who needs several thousand dollars of care. If he patches up the guy, only to find out later that the patient has no ability to pay the bill (even if willing), then the doctor has been forced to do his work for free.

Lawyers always know ahead of time that they're doing pro bono work. Doctors have no such ability to be fully informed.


A solution can be found. There are many options. One could pay over time. Taking a minor problem and extrapolating the solution on an entire population is inherently unequal and the opposite of liberty.



Politically or philosophically?


Both.


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  10:00:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Gorgo
I doubt that we really have much disagreement on the first point, so unless you wanted to come up with a definition that makes some point, I'll assume you weren't really asking for a definition of money.


If your definition at its base is a tool; then yes we agree.

The point isn't who owns the money so much as who controls the money, and that tends to be them that's got it.

Again, there is not just one method for obtaining that control. As I've stated, and which you seem to ignore, one such method of creating poverty is the Federal Reserve. There are many others. One is the war against the people of Iraq.


Agreed about the control of money.
Agreed about the Federal Reserve.
Agreed about most wars including the current middle east excursions.


As to the last point, labor has little to do with money. It has more to do with race, gender and genetics.



Ahh, but the profits of your labor are represented by the current tool of transaction (money). If money is controlled than your labor is controlled and the profit of your labor is controlled.

I think we agree much more than you imagine.


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  10:05:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

A solution can be found. There are many options. One could pay over time. Taking a minor problem and extrapolating the solution on an entire population is inherently unequal and the opposite of liberty.
A minor problem? How many people can afford medical care?

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  10:11:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

A solution can be found. There are many options. One could pay over time. Taking a minor problem and extrapolating the solution on an entire population is inherently unequal and the opposite of liberty.
A minor problem? How many people can afford medical care?


Most, how many people can not?


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 07/15/2007 :  10:19:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Most, how many people can not?
You made the claim, you back it up.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 13 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.22 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000