Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 How to spot empty rhetoric in political ads
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

marfknox
SFN Die Hard

USA
3739 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2007 :  09:11:26  Show Profile  Visit marfknox's Homepage  Send marfknox an AOL message Send marfknox a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Probably most of the people on SFN are savvy enough to see through this crap already, but a reminder never hurts!
In this article we examine two examples of what we call "fact-free" advertising, which we see in abundance. These ads seek to associate the candidate with a string of positive words and images but are void of specifics. Voters should beware.

We have chosen an example from Republican Mitt Romney that is full of words such as “families,” “values,” “patriotic,” “strength” and “innovation.” Who could be against any of those? Romney is also squarely against “waste in the federal government,” but who isn't? And what does he consider "waste?" He doesn't say.

Our example from Democratic candidate John Edwards also pushes the "strength" and "patriotism" buttons, showing that vacuous words are a bipartisan tactic. Edwards also speaks loftily of making America "the country of the 21st century," whatever that means. He says he'd "lift families out of poverty" and "strengthen the middle class" but doesn't say how, or define what he means by "middle class." He says, "We know what needs to be done," but doesn't say what that is.


http://www.factcheck.org/99_fact-free.html

"Too much certainty and clarity could lead to cruel intolerance" -Karen Armstrong

Check out my art store: http://www.marfknox.etsy.com

On fire for Christ
SFN Regular

Norway
1273 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2007 :  10:08:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send On fire for Christ a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I dont really see what the problem is, unless they avoid actual details throughout their entire campaign. Sometimes politicians have to connect to people and getting into the nitty gritty of policies etc is not always the best way to do this.

Go to Top of Page

pleco
SFN Addict

USA
2998 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2007 :  10:11:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit pleco's Homepage Send pleco a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Marf, I think this ties directly into your post about Spinoza here.

by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2007 :  11:33:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by On fire for Christ

I dont really see what the problem is, unless they avoid actual details throughout their entire campaign. Sometimes politicians have to connect to people and getting into the nitty gritty of policies etc is not always the best way to do this.
I think this kind of BS is a big deal. Those kinds of statements are only valid in summarizing more detailed statements that mention actual facts and positions. Without those, they are only so many Orwellian phrases, meant to touch knee-jerk nerves while bypassing the brain. Critically thinking political "consumers" should reject the messenger who has no message but propagandistic platitudes.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2007 :  11:37:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Amen to that Brother!

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

marfknox
SFN Die Hard

USA
3739 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2007 :  11:57:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit marfknox's Homepage  Send marfknox an AOL message Send marfknox a Private Message  Reply with Quote
BPS wrote:
Amen to that Brother!
LOL! I was going to respond with the same thing!

"Too much certainty and clarity could lead to cruel intolerance" -Karen Armstrong

Check out my art store: http://www.marfknox.etsy.com

Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2007 :  12:06:18   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Glory, hallelujah!


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2007 :  16:23:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
How to spot empty rhetoric in political ads


Ummm... by turning on your TV and watching one?

I don't recall having ever seen a political ad that wasn't empty of actual content.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

Orwellingly Yurz
SFN Regular

USA
529 Posts

Posted - 11/06/2007 :  21:03:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Orwellingly Yurz a Private Message  Reply with Quote
YO: Marfknox is one of my fave contributors to this site, but I need to put in my 2 cents regarding her first post in this thread, wherein she puts forward an admirally balanced critic about the Orwellianese of political ad copy, equally faulting Romney and Edwards.

I take a rather pragmatic approach for whom I'm going to vote. I do this knowing that each or all sides provide us with more than enough bullshit in their rhetoric. The definition of the word 'campaign' is 'a series of staged events.' Quite accurate.

So, what I do is figure out what choice on the ballot will provide the most security and comfort to the MOST US citizens. That's why I usually always vote for Democrats, although many of them today are in dire need of a pair, Dianne Feinstein, notwithstanding.

John Edwards is so much totally a better candidate than Mitt Romney
could ever be. And, like Romney, John Edwards is also very rich.

Orwellian Yurz

"The modern conservative...is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy. That is the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."
--John Kenneth Galbraith

If dogs run free
Then what must be,
Must be...
And that is all
--Bob Dylan

The neo-cons have gotten welfare for themselves down to a fine art.
--me

"The meek shall inherit the earth, but not the mineral rights."
--J. Paul Getty

"The great thing about Art isn't what it give us, but what we become through it."
--Oscar Wilde

"We have Art in order not to die of life."
--Albert Camus

"I cling like a miser to the freedom I lose when surrounded by an abundance of things."
--Albert Camus

"Experience is the name so many people give to their mistakes."
--Oscar Wilde
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 11/07/2007 :  05:26:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dude

How to spot empty rhetoric in political ads


Ummm... by turning on your TV and watching one?

I don't recall having ever seen a political ad that wasn't empty of actual content.


Ditto. I ignore them all and get the information I need from independant sources, easy enough in this age of the computer.

Actually, much of that info can be observed in the activities and actions of the various candidates in their day-to-day activities, and by the indictments of their associates. I dunno what Rudy's gonna do about Keirk, if I've spelled that right.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

marfknox
SFN Die Hard

USA
3739 Posts

Posted - 11/07/2007 :  06:02:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit marfknox's Homepage  Send marfknox an AOL message Send marfknox a Private Message  Reply with Quote
OY wrote:
John Edwards is so much totally a better candidate than Mitt Romney
could ever be.
I'm not going to argue with that! Personally, I wish Edwards was doing better in the primary race. Maybe he'll have a second wind, but I doubt it. Sadly, he seems to have lost momentum.

"Too much certainty and clarity could lead to cruel intolerance" -Karen Armstrong

Check out my art store: http://www.marfknox.etsy.com

Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 11/07/2007 :  07:41:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by On fire for Christ

I dont really see what the problem is, unless they avoid actual details throughout their entire campaign. Sometimes politicians have to connect to people and getting into the nitty gritty of policies etc is not always the best way to do this.
I'll sort of defend this sentiment inasmuch as it has to be hard to get across a complex solution to an even more complex problem in 15 or 30 seconds. A mind-numbing ad detailing exactly how a person is going to fix the tax code (or whatever) would be a turn-off, I think.

Of course, with this in mind, why do ads at all?? I guess for me, I'd like an ad like Edwards' saying "I'm going to do X or Y", and then direct people to a webpage where I can go into more details.

This would require that Edwards actually have a detailed plan-- he may, or he may not. But it would work for me, if he did such a thing.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.17 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000