Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Hell, your final destination?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 27

pleco
SFN Addict

USA
2998 Posts

Posted - 01/26/2008 :  08:26:33   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit pleco's Homepage Send pleco a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Robb

There is no new revelation from God. I will let John MacArthur speak on the issue.http://www.biblebb.com/files/MAC/NEWREV.HTM

The Bible is a progressive revelation from God that is complete. Nobody will receive a revelation from God in our day. So if someone says God told me to kill so and so you can be sure it was not from God.


If god commanded you to kill, would you do it? The answer would have to be yes, right? And you say god wouldn't do that, then I bring the OT in, because it certainly has in the past. I notice you don't ever tackle what god in the past. Is that because it is hard to talk about?

Or, are you saying god wouldn't do that because there can be no more revelation? That would mean that prayer is out the window too?



by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
Go to Top of Page

the seeker
New Member

USA
14 Posts

Posted - 01/26/2008 :  17:43:22   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send the seeker a Private Message  Reply with Quote
What I think is that there is no hell, that when you die, you most likely just rot in the ground and turn into carbon for living things to breathe in.

Every religion has a different interpretation of hell--and it's all stupid.

I think that religion and God are just allusions formed by your mind...crutches people lean on to find guidance, to find support and "love" from a supreme being that resides in your head and in your head only. But that's just my opinion.

My signature consists of my not having a signature.
Go to Top of Page

Chippewa
SFN Regular

USA
1496 Posts

Posted - 01/26/2008 :  19:44:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Chippewa's Homepage Send Chippewa a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Robb

...You need to humble yourself and acknowledge you are not a good person, you deserve eternal punishment in hell for your sin against a holy and infinite God. Only then can you understand John 3:16...


John in room 316


.
Go to Top of Page

bngbuck
SFN Addict

USA
2437 Posts

Posted - 01/26/2008 :  20:38:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bngbuck a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Humbert

Robb asks:
Are you certain there is no God?
You answer:
No, but I'm damn confident one wasn't involved with the bible in any way.
Robb then asks:
Then why do you portray yourself as an atheist?
Your reply:
Because an atheist is someone who doesn't believe that any gods exist, which I don't. Certainty is not a requirement. People who criticize atheists on the grounds that they can't know with certainty that no gods exist grossly misunderstand what the atheist position actually says
and
Theists claim that at least one god (sometimes more) exists. Atheism is simply the position that theists have failed to adequately support that claim.
Why would that position not be more properly described as agnosticism? Or, to phrase it differently, in your view, what is the difference between atheism and agnosticism?

You state that you believe that no gods exist. But you also state that you are not certain of that belief. Is this not the position of an agnostic? Are you not ascribing degrees of probability to your (and others) belief systems?

Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 01/26/2008 :  22:19:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by bngbuck

...what is the difference between atheism and agnosticism?
I'm of a mind that there is no difference.

The popular definitions of the words are clearly different. One means "belief in no god(s)," and the other means "wishy-washy failure to have an opinion." But Huxley coined "agnostic" to mean just what's its roots mean, "without mystical knowledge." Someone who is an atheist because they lack evidence for a god is an agnostic under that definition. And nobody who lacks mystical knowledge would be a theist.

But really, it seems that Huxley coined "agnostic" in order to avoid the negative baggage that "atheist" had already accrued in his day (and which continues today), but it really meant the same thing.

H., among others (like myself), is obviously trying to take the defintions back from the popular usage, a usage which really leaves little room for the "lack of evidence" sort of atheism. The people who think that "atheism" means only "positive belief in no god(s)" and that agnosticism is a 50-50 toss-up position are the sorts of people who simply don't understand the position of taking a strong stand on the lack of evidence. They assume that everyone has either made a choice or has chosen to not choose at all - a black-or-white world which simply doesn't match up to reality.

Allowing the popular definitions to frame the discussion does a disservice to all.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2008 :  04:44:05   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
"An agnostic is nothing but an atheist who lacks the courage of his convictions." ~~ Don't recall who said that. Heh, wish it'd been me.

I don't believe in much of anything. Belief creates boundaries thereby limiting inquiry and warping imagination.






"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2008 :  10:28:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by filthy

"An agnostic is nothing but an atheist who lacks the courage of his convictions." ~~ Don't recall who said that. Heh, wish it'd been me.


As I recall, the last time you posted that quote I responded with a resounding "bite me." Guess it didn't take...


Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2008 :  10:46:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
An agnostic is an atheist, because an agnostic does not have a god-belief.

The thing many people do not comprehend is this: Dismissal of a claim based on lack of evidence is a strong stance. It is often dismissed as being wishy-washy by those who hold strong views on the opposing ends of an issue, but that is because most people don't understand logic.

If your claim is dismissed because it lacks evidence, it is the same as being told you are just making stuff up.

An agnostic, by calling themselves agnostic, is telling the people on the opposing ends that they are full of shit.

Thats what I get from reading Huxley anyway, the impression that he was basically telling both sides of the god/no-god argument that their strongly stated positions made without supporting evidence were equally stupid, and that the only defensible position was one that dismissed deities as unevidenced without making a definite claim against their existence.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2008 :  10:59:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Dude:
An agnostic is an atheist, because an agnostic does not have a god-belief.


Bingo!

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

the seeker
New Member

USA
14 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2008 :  12:00:52   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send the seeker a Private Message  Reply with Quote
An agnostic is an atheist, because an agnostic does not have a god-belief.

Not necessarily. Atheists are cynics, while agnostics are simply skeptics. I am one myself, and...we don't exactly NOT believe in God, we suspect that there might be a "god" or a supreme being out there. We just think that there is no evidence to prove it, and no evidence to disprove it. Therefore, we're neither theists nor atheists....and that's why we have our own name, which is "agnostic".


My signature consists of my not having a signature.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2008 :  12:59:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Kil

Originally posted by filthy

"An agnostic is nothing but an atheist who lacks the courage of his convictions." ~~ Don't recall who said that. Heh, wish it'd been me.


As I recall, the last time you posted that quote I responded with a resounding "bite me." Guess it didn't take...


Oh, was that you? I remember the incident, just forgot who was involved. You really should be more forcful when you make such remarks....






"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2008 :  13:11:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by the seeker
Atheists are cynics, while agnostics are simply skeptics.
Pure nonsense.
I am one myself, and...we don't exactly NOT believe in God, we suspect that there might be a "god" or a supreme being out there. We just think that there is no evidence to prove it, and no evidence to disprove it. Therefore, we're neither theists nor atheists....and that's why we have our own name, which is "agnostic".
Well, you need to keep seeking, seeker, because these definitions seem to be completely your own personal invention with no relation to their actual meanings. As others have already noted, one may be an agnostic atheist without contradiction.

Atheism concerns belief while agnosticism concerns the limits of knowledge. If you don't believe me, feel free to read up on those subjects yourself.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Edited by - H. Humbert on 01/27/2008 13:12:12
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2008 :  13:47:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
filthy:
You really should be more forcful when you make such remarks....

Well, perhaps I lack the courage of my convictions. Ever think of that?


Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2008 :  14:18:49   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Kil

filthy:
You really should be more forcful when you make such remarks....

Well, perhaps I lack the courage of my convictions. Ever think of that?


Nah. I'm just joshin' ya. Just gettin' warmed up for April.


It's fast approaching, you know, and we've got to be in shape for it.





"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2008 :  16:56:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
the seeker said:
Not necessarily. Atheists are cynics, while agnostics are simply skeptics. I am one myself, and...we don't exactly NOT believe in God, we suspect that there might be a "god" or a supreme being out there. We just think that there is no evidence to prove it, and no evidence to disprove it. Therefore, we're neither theists nor atheists....and that's why we have our own name, which is "agnostic".


Perhaps you should go read Huxley.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 27 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.34 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000