Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Great News! Pledge is Unconstitutional!
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  11:30:41  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
quote:
A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that the Pledge of Allegiance is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion and cannot be recited in schools.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49407-2002Jun26.html

They need to get rid of the 1950ish addition of "under God". Then I'd have no problem at all with it being recited at school.

------------

fortiter in re, suaviter in modo

Edited by - tokyodreamer on 06/26/2002 11:31:36

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  11:42:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
Even without it, it's nationalistic brainwashing that's worse than religion.



"Not one human life should be expended in this reckless violence called a war against terrorism." - Howard Zinn
Go to Top of Page

PhDreamer
SFN Regular

USA
925 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  13:11:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit PhDreamer's Homepage Send PhDreamer a Private Message
This is all over the place now. I'm thinking the bolder of our kind might want to fire up the letter-to-the-editor machine before the fundies get the first words.



Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.
-D. Hume
Go to Top of Page

Tim
SFN Regular

USA
775 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  13:50:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tim a Private Message
This does seem to be good news--A start, of sorts. This was a split decision in a Federal Appeals court in San Francisco. I'm curious as to how the Renquist court will address the issue. Will they split tending toward the conservative interpretation, and rule that this, like "in God we trust" is merely benign language, and not prayer? I realize the endorsement aspect applies, but will Mr.'s Renquist, Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy, and Ms. O'Conner?

"The Constitution ..., is a marvelous document for self-government by Christian people. But the minute you turn the document into the hands of non-Christian and atheistic people they can use it to destroy the very foundation of our society." P. Robertson
Go to Top of Page

@tomic
Administrator

USA
4607 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  13:56:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit @tomic's Homepage Send @tomic a Private Message
That's what I have been wondering Tim. It is interesting though that a previous Supreme Court decision was referred to. I'm not sure that will help but I doubt it can hurt. This would be a very minor victory for church/state separation but a victory nonetheless.

@tomic

Gravity, not just a good idea...it's the law!
Go to Top of Page

Hobbes
New Member

USA
34 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  15:10:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Hobbes a Private Message
[quote]
Even without it, it's nationalistic brainwashing that's worse than religion.

Uh... I suppose you could attach this sort of label to the pledge... if it was coerced out of people. I may be a bit biased, because I'm in the Air Force, but I don't think that speaking the pledge is brainwashing at all. National allegiance is not worse than religion, because you can serve the greater ideal, namely, a free society, while speaking out and trying to change the things you don't agree with. I see freely reciting the pledge (without the god part, mind you) as an affirmation of freedom.

Why the f--k didn't you tell us there was someone in the bathroom? Slip your mind? Did you forget there was someone in there with a god damned hand cannon? -Vince, Pulp Fiction
Go to Top of Page

dimossi
Skeptic Friend

USA
141 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  15:30:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit dimossi's Homepage  Send dimossi an AOL message Send dimossi a Private Message
Here are some links to various polls on the ruling that the Pledge is unconstitutional:

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/moneyline/

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,56312,00.html

http://www.msnbc.com/news/772714.asp?cp1=1

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." [Philip K. Dick, science-fiction author]
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  17:05:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
Well, if you have a teacher stand in front of a class and lead you at the age of five through eighteen to say something that you don't completely understand which means that you'll die for Chiquita if you're told to, then if that ain't brainwashing, I'd say it's pretty durn close.

quote:

Uh... I suppose


"Not one human life should be expended in this reckless violence called a war against terrorism." - Howard Zinn
Go to Top of Page

Physiofly
Skeptic Friend

USA
90 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  17:57:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Physiofly a Private Message
quote:
Well, if you have a teacher stand in front of a class and lead you at the age of five through eighteen to say something that you don't completely understand which means that you'll die for Chiquita if you're told to, then if that ain't brainwashing, I'd say it's pretty durn close.


Well Gorgo, it obviously didn't brainwash you, Hobbes or me (and yes, I'm in the Air Force too and no, I won't die for Chiquita). I understand Hobbes' point - it's just an affirmation of our values which is how I think most Americans think of it and why so many fundies think the "under God" should be left in. However, your point is well taken - a common technique of group control (AKA "brainwashing") is repetition of "accepted" ideas. I think the answer to this dichotomy is to require critical thinking be taught in our schools as early as possible. It would be hard to make happen given the sad state of our education system but dropping the "under God" from the pledge is a good start.



"Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a
deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions." - Niccolo Machiavelli
Go to Top of Page

ljbrs
SFN Regular

USA
842 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  18:18:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ljbrs a Private Message
I learned the Pledge of Allegiance in elementary school, long before the most recent *under God* change. I first heard the new and silly pledge when I was in the auditorium of a school with my class, and I nearly choked when everybody else was chanting *under God* while I was saying *indivisible*. It took all of my self conntrol to stifle a horse laugh! I never recite the *under God* or *under Whoever or Whatever* part, so they have not yet taken over my brain. It is (obviously) an OLD BRAIN, and I do not come into contact with the Pledge of Allegiance very often. When I do, I think about something else of greater interest. I am patriotic in that I believe in the ideas of the founding fathers, but the Pledge of Allegiance was not a part of the founding of our great country.

ljbrs

"Nothing is more damaging to a new truth than an old error." Goethe

Edited by - ljbrs on 06/26/2002 18:19:48
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  18:38:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
Well, the decision is likely to be overturned soon so any of our gloating over it is probably moot.

And, actually, they did brainwash me. It took years to get completely clear of religion and the religion of nationalism, and if you're in the Air Force and you're not going to fight so that Disney has slaves, then more power to you.


quote:

Well Gorgo, it obviously didn't brainwash you, Hobbes or me (and yes, I'm in the Air Force too and no, I won't die for Chiquita). I understand Hobbes' point - it's just an affirmation of our values which is how I think most Americans think of it and why so many fundies think the "under God" should be left in. However, your point is well taken - a common technique of group control (AKA "brainwashing") is repetition of "accepted" ideas. I think the answer to this dichotomy is to require critical thinking be taught in our schools as early as possible. It would be hard to make happen given the sad state of our education system but dropping the "under God" from the pledge is a good start.





"Not one human life should be expended in this reckless violence called a war against terrorism." - Howard Zinn
Go to Top of Page

dimossi
Skeptic Friend

USA
141 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  20:26:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit dimossi's Homepage  Send dimossi an AOL message Send dimossi a Private Message
A few more polls:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washdc/2002/06/26/pledge-of-allegiance.htm

http://tbo.com/

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2002/06/26/state1513EDT0109.DTL

If anyone has any other links to polls, please add them to this thread. Thanks.

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." [Philip K. Dick, science-fiction author]
Go to Top of Page

Snake
SFN Addict

USA
2511 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  21:26:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Snake's Homepage  Send Snake an ICQ Message  Send Snake a Yahoo! Message Send Snake a Private Message
quote:

Well, the decision is likely to be overturned soon so any of our gloating over it is probably moot.


I'm a bit afraid of that too. I say call/write your congressman and senators to tell them what you think. It may not change anything but it's letting someone in government know what the rest of the public thinks. Isn't what they are there for, to do the will of the people?
IMO, we have to speak up any chance we get or no one will know there are other opinions. I mean speak up in places that count, not just on web sites.

* * * * * *
*Carabao forever.
-----------------
Bye, bye Los Angeles. SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SECESSION - YES.
Go to Top of Page

dimossi
Skeptic Friend

USA
141 Posts

Posted - 06/26/2002 :  21:38:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit dimossi's Homepage  Send dimossi an AOL message Send dimossi a Private Message
More polls:

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-pledge0626.story?coll=ny%2Dtop%2Dheadlines

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/topstory/1471900

http://www.newsnet5.com/sh/education/stories/education-153205920020626-130653.html#

http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/news/0602/27pledge.html

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/index.asp

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." [Philip K. Dick, science-fiction author]
Go to Top of Page

Snake
SFN Addict

USA
2511 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  01:19:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Snake's Homepage  Send Snake an ICQ Message  Send Snake a Yahoo! Message Send Snake a Private Message
quote:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/index.asp


I voted in all the polls listed in this folder. As expected it was about 3 or 4 to one against the courts ruling. (what morons!)
But this one, above.....what's wrong with you people in Seattle?
@????
It was almost 50/50. Was that a mistake?
Maybe we should all move to Washington. So we can be where there are more sensible people.

* * * * * *
*Carabao forever.
-----------------
Bye, bye Los Angeles. SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SECESSION - YES.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  02:02:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
It will almost certainly be overturned. A pity.

But, it it's not, then we can demand that they get their damned slogan off our money.

f


Evolution is a bankrupt speculative philosophy, not a scientific fact. Only a spiritually bankrupt society could ever believe it.... Only atheists could accept this Satanic theory.
-- Rev. Jimmy Swaggart (source unknown)

Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.16 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000