Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Great News! Pledge is Unconstitutional!
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5

NottyImp
Skeptic Friend

United Kingdom
143 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  03:18:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send NottyImp a Private Message
quote:
I think the answer to this dichotomy is to require critical thinking be taught in our schools as early as possible. It would be hard to make happen given the sad state of our education system


I can opnly speak for Britain, but our government seems to have spent the last 20 years attempting to eradicate any kind of original thought or "critical thinking" from our children. Being able to question things sadly gets in the way of being a good, hard-working, loyal citizen and it's the last thing governments want to promote amongst the working population as far as I can see.

If we achieve any level of intellectual critical discourse it seems to me it is in spite of education, not because of it. Or am I being too cynical?

"My body is a temple - I desecrate it daily."
Go to Top of Page

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  05:30:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
While I still heartily support and agree with the ruling, I'm beginning to feel less ecstatic about it, considering what I'm hearing at work and on the local news.

I'm disgusted and revolted by the obscene hypocrisy. Never in my personal experience have I gotten even a hint of nervousness for my safety or the quality of my work environment.

Not anymore. So-called "loving" Christians all around me are telling me how they think "these people" should be shot, California should be nuked, they should be sent to Iraq as women, etc.

So help me, if I get one email containing a joke or a diatribe calling for the painful deaths of people who agree with the ruling, I'm going to "come out of the closet", and let my fellow employees know that they are crossing the line.

(by the way, if anyone wants to continue discussing whether or not a sectarian pledge is good or bad, I humbly suggest a new thread in the Politics section.)



------------

fortiter in re, suaviter in modo
Go to Top of Page

PhDreamer
SFN Regular

USA
925 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  05:51:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit PhDreamer's Homepage Send PhDreamer a Private Message
Preach it, brother Tokyo!

I guess I'm most embarassed that the entirety of our elected governmental bodies (the president and senate at least) are completely ignorant of the facts of the case and the way constitutional law cases come to bear. The ad nauseating argument, last seen by me spewing from the trap of Newt the larger on Insanity and Colmes, that the judges should be removed because they are disconnected from popular opinion is absolutely, completely, and in no uncertain terms, bullshit. The only thing that matters is whether our appointed judicial officials find the pledge, and the language contained therein, to be in violation of any right or restriction delineated in the Constitution. Henceforth, in order to maintain a semblance of sanity, it shall be my standard practice when confronted with reactionary, emotional nonsense to simply ask for a Constitutionally-based argument that supports the continued inclusion of the God clause in the pledge. I expect that to end most discussions rather quickly.



Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.
-D. Hume
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  05:56:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
Well said. What I think people like Newt are forgetting is that the Constitution is supposed to protect people from changing public opinion. If it's popular superstitious nonsense, then Newt thinks that anyone who disagrees with it should be removed from office.

How about those brave public officials (some of whom seem to have forgotten the words) parading their love of theistic tyranny on the Capitol steps?

quote:

Preach it, brother Tokyo!




"Not one human life should be expended in this reckless violence called a war against terrorism." - Howard Zinn
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  06:31:09   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
One of my Senators has already voiced his opinion, and is "shocked, saddened and exasperated by liberal efforts to eliminate any and all references to God in our country."

http://www.senate.gov/~voinovich/

This is the guy that, as governor, supported "With God All Things Are Possible" as the Ohio State motto.

"Not one human life should be expended in this reckless violence called a war against terrorism." - Howard Zinn
Go to Top of Page

James
SFN Regular

USA
754 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  07:24:29   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send James a Yahoo! Message Send James a Private Message
quote:

While I still heartily support and agree with the ruling, I'm beginning to feel less ecstatic about it, considering what I'm hearing at work and on the local news.

I'm disgusted and revolted by the obscene hypocrisy. Never in my personal experience have I gotten even a hint of nervousness for my safety or the quality of my work environment.

Not anymore. So-called "loving" Christians all around me are telling me how they think "these people" should be shot, California should be nuked, they should be sent to Iraq as women, etc.

So help me, if I get one email containing a joke or a diatribe calling for the painful deaths of people who agree with the ruling, I'm going to "come out of the closet", and let my fellow employees know that they are crossing the line.



Hallelujah!

________________________
Monday is an awful way to spend 1/7 of your life.

Two more years...Two more years...Two more years...Two more years...Two more years...

*whine*
Go to Top of Page

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  07:56:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
An interesting (supposed) fact I learned here (which I had to stop reading about halfway through page 4, as the adsurdity was making my head feel like it was about to explode) about what President Eisenhower said when he signed the law into place in 1954:

quote:
millions of our schoolchildren will daily proclaim in every city and town, every village and rural schoolhouse, the dedication of our nation and our people to the Almighty.


------------

fortiter in re, suaviter in modo
Go to Top of Page

dimossi
Skeptic Friend

USA
141 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  08:00:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit dimossi's Homepage  Send dimossi an AOL message Send dimossi a Private Message
Other important links pertaining to this ruling:

Full text of the court ruling:
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/FE05EEE79C2A97B688256BE3007FEE32/$file/0016423.pdf?openelement

Michael Newdow's Pledge restoration website:
http://www.restorethepledge.com/

List of Senators by state:
http://www.senate.gov/senators/senator_by_state.cfm

An online petition:
http://www.phpconnect.com/petition/petition.html

Godless March on Washington (Saturday, November 2, 2002):
http://godlessamericans.org/


And here is another poll:
http://www.vote.com/vote/46960915/index.phtml?cat=4075633

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." [Philip K. Dick, science-fiction author]
Go to Top of Page

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  08:12:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
The simplest reasoning I could come up with:

1. There is no possible way to claim that the 1954 law was in any way secular.

2. Since the law was not secular, it was religious.

3. If it was religious, it was unConstitutional.

------------

fortiter in re, suaviter in modo
Go to Top of Page

PhDreamer
SFN Regular

USA
925 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  08:17:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit PhDreamer's Homepage Send PhDreamer a Private Message
quote:

The simplest reasoning I could come up with:

1. There is no possible way to claim that the 1954 law was in any way secular.

2. Since the law was not secular, it was religious.

3. If it was religious, it was unConstitutional.



Bingo. I expect to wear this argument out in the next few weeks.

BTW all, the good doctor's web page: www.restorethepledge.com is a good source of info about his endeavor. There are a few places for comments and such but it seems he is having server troubles at the moment.



Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.
-D. Hume
Go to Top of Page

Snake
SFN Addict

USA
2511 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  09:13:25   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Snake's Homepage  Send Snake an ICQ Message  Send Snake a Yahoo! Message Send Snake a Private Message
quote:

If anyone has any other links to polls, please add them to this thread. Thanks.

http://www.vote.com

And I'm telling you people. Don't wait, do speak out. Tell those morons at work what you think.
Call the Whitehouse and your congressmen. We can't go on letting THEM push us around.
I'm going to call Barbara (bubble head) Boxer as soon as I log off. I suggest you call your senators too.

* * * * * *
*Carabao forever.
-----------------
Bye, bye Los Angeles. SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SECESSION - YES.
Go to Top of Page

@tomic
Administrator

USA
4607 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  10:02:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit @tomic's Homepage Send @tomic a Private Message
As expected our representatives will make this a bigger issue than ohhhh protecting the nation so don't expect this to last long at all. I must say that the way the press is treating this is shamelful. Did anyone notice how odd the headlines looked? "Court declares Pldge Unconstitutional"? Hell it wouldn't take much to fix it up to comly with American ideals.


@tomic

Gravity, not just a good idea...it's the law!
Go to Top of Page

Snake
SFN Addict

USA
2511 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  10:15:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Snake's Homepage  Send Snake an ICQ Message  Send Snake a Yahoo! Message Send Snake a Private Message
quote:

If anyone has any other links to polls, please add them to this thread. Thanks.

http://www.vote.com
[/quote]
Whoops, sorry I see you already had that site but with all the garbage at the end of the address.
But for AOL users, you should see what's on the message board. [AOL News: Pledge Poll] Couldn't find one (execpt mine now) post for what the court did. Those idiots don't know what they are talking about. It's so frustrating.
I do feel better though, called Barbara, Diane and my congressman Howard Berman, told them there was no such thing as god and the court did the right thing AND they should stay out of it.
Of course when I asked how the comments were going my opinion was in the minority. Damn!
The senators weren't asking for names but said they were recording the tally however I was proud to give my name and address to the congressman.
(if I don't post again, you'll know the men in black came to my door)


* * * * * *
*Carabao forever.
-----------------
Bye, bye Los Angeles. SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SECESSION - YES.
Go to Top of Page

Snake
SFN Addict

USA
2511 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  10:15:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Snake's Homepage  Send Snake an ICQ Message  Send Snake a Yahoo! Message Send Snake a Private Message
quote:

If anyone has any other links to polls, please add them to this thread. Thanks.

http://www.vote.com
[/quote]
Whoops, sorry I see you already had that site but with all the garbage at the end of the address.
But for AOL users, you should see what's on the message board. [AOL News: Pledge Poll] Couldn't find one (execpt mine now) post for what the court did. Those idiots don't know what they are talking about. It's so frustrating.
I do feel better though, called Barbara, Diane and my congressman Howard Berman, told them there was no such thing as god and the court did the right thing AND they should stay out of it.
Of course when I asked how the comments were going my opinion was in the minority. Damn!
The senators weren't asking for names but said they were recording the tally however I was proud to give my name and address to the congressman.
(if I don't post again, you'll know the men in black came to my door)


* * * * * *
*Carabao forever.
-----------------
Bye, bye Los Angeles. SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SECESSION - YES.
Go to Top of Page

Snake
SFN Addict

USA
2511 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2002 :  11:18:52   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Snake's Homepage  Send Snake an ICQ Message  Send Snake a Yahoo! Message Send Snake a Private Message
quote:

One of my Senators has already voiced his opinion, and is "shocked, saddened and exasperated by liberal efforts to eliminate any and all references to God in our country."

http://www.senate.gov/~voinovich/

This is the guy that, as governor, supported "With God All Things Are Possible" as the Ohio State motto.


Those people are sick, IMO. Mentaly ill.
Ok, here's a site and I don't think it's been mentioned yet.
http://www.governmentguide.com
I'm thinking of calling P. Bush too but (sigh!) what a waste of time to tell him there is NO god. I can't stand listening to that that moron speak. Fortunately I'm usually sitting when I hear him talk.

* * * * * *
*Carabao forever.
-----------------
Bye, bye Los Angeles. SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SECESSION - YES.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.22 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000