Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Bible Prophecies
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 9

walt fristoe
SFN Regular

USA
505 Posts

Posted - 02/16/2003 :  18:13:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send walt fristoe a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by darwin alogos

waltfristoe:
quote:
That's all well and good, DA, but do you agree that the criteria are valid?

Not a problem



Great, then can you give us an example of a supposed prophecy fulfillment that meets all 5 of these criteria?

"If God chose George Bus of all the people in the world, how good could God be?"
Bill Maher
Go to Top of Page

the_ignored
SFN Addict

2562 Posts

Posted - 02/16/2003 :  21:53:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send the_ignored a Private Message
Just to fan the flames even more:
from: http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?postid=740288#post740288

quote:

The Tyre prophecies did indeed come to pass.

In the 26th chapter of Ezekiel (592-570 BC) seven things are predicted to happen to the city of Tyre:



1) Nebuchadnezzar will destroy the mainland of Tyre (Ezekiel 26:8).

2) Many nations against Tyre (Ezekiel 26:3).

3) Make her a bare rock; flat like the top of a rock (Ezekiel 26:4).

4) Fishermen will spread their nets over the site (Ezekiel 26:5).

5) Throw the debris into the water (Ezekiel 26:12).

6) Never be rebuilt (Ezekiel 26:14).

7) Never be found again (Ezekiel 26:21) (2/285)



Nebuchadnezzar laid siege to mainland Tyre three years after the prophecy and after a 13 year siege (585-573 BC) Tyre made terms and acknowledged Babylonian authority over them (4 xxii.452) When Nebuchadnezzar broke the gates down, he found the city almost empty. The majority of the people had moved by ship to an island about 1/2 miles off the coast and fortified a city there. The mainland city was destroyed in 573 BC, as predicted. The city of Tyre on the island remained a powerful city for several hundred years. (2/286)



Alexander the Great, in his war on Persia, marching southward called on each city to open their gates to him, as part of his plan to deny the use to the Persian fleet. Tyre refused to do so, and Alexander laid siege to the city. Possessing no fleet, he demolished old Tyre, on the mainland, and with the debris built a causeway 200 feet wide across the straits separating the old and new towns, erecting towers and war engines at the farther end. (4/xxii. 452) Tyre continually raided the causeway with fire-ships greatly retarding progress, until Alexander pressured conquered subjects to make ships for his operation. After attaining a superior naval force, Alexander finished the causeway, battered the walls of Tyre down killed eight thousand of the inhabitants and sold thirty thousand into slavery. (5/153)



A history book by a secular historian reads, "Alexander the Great ... reduced Tyre to ruins... The larger part of the site of the once great city is now bare as the top of a rock --- a place where fishermen now spread their nets to dry." (5/55)



Another historian, John C. Beck, says, "The history of Tyre does not stop with after the conquest of Alexander. Men continue to rebuild her and armies continue to besiege her walls, until finally after sixteen hundred years, she falls never to be rebuilt again." (6/41)



All the prophecies of Ezekiel about Tyre have come true: Nebuchadnezzar destroyed the mainland city of Tyre; Many nations were against Tyre; Alexander made her a bare rock and threw debris into the water to make the causeway; fishermen now spread nets over the site; (there is a city of Tyre today, but it is located down the coast from the original Tyre) the old city of Tyre has never been rebuilt, even though a great freshwater spring are located at the site, providing 10,000,000 gallons daily. It is still an excellent site today but has never been rebuilt, although many have tried. All seven of the predictions came true in the minutest detail.

>From: enuffenuff@fastmail.fm
(excerpt follows):
> I'm looking to teach these two bastards a lesson they'll never forget.
> Personal visit by mates of mine. No violence, just a wee little chat.
>
> **** has also committed more crimes than you can count with his
> incitement of hatred against a religion. That law came in about 2007
> much to ****'s ignorance. That is fact and his writing will become well
> know as well as him becoming a publicly known icon of hatred.
>
> Good luck with that fuckwit. And Reynold, fucking run, and don't stop.
> Disappear would be best as it was you who dared to attack me on my
> illness knowing nothing of the cause. You disgust me and you are top of
> the list boy. Again, no violence. Just regular reminders of who's there
> and visits to see you are behaving. Nothing scary in reality. But I'd
> still disappear if I was you.

What brought that on? this. Original posting here.

Another example of this guy's lunacy here.
Go to Top of Page

Tim
SFN Regular

USA
775 Posts

Posted - 02/18/2003 :  06:44:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tim a Private Message
Apparently, Dad4Jesus at Rapture Ready has been reading some pretty typical apologetics. The technique used here seems to be simple misdirection, combined with the selective inclusion of typical apologetic assumptions.

quote:
Nebuchadnezzar will destroy the mainland of Tyre (Ezekiel 26:8).
This statement seems to want to lower the expectations of the writer. A careful reading of the text shows that Ezekiel does predict the demise of the mainland suburbs. Then, Ezekiel goes on to show that Nebuchadnezzar breaches the walls of Tyre. Notice that nowhere does Ezekiel mention any other kings or generals invading Tyre since the introduction of the “king of kings” until the breach of the walls, (and on to the end of this supposed prophecy). In the verses listed below, Nebuchadnezzar is the only singular person referred to, and Tyre is the only individual city referred to. There is no reason to assume that the pronoun “he” suddenly begins to refer to anyone other than Nebuchadnezzar, namely Alexander the Great. Next, there is no reason to assume that the pronouns “thee” and “thy” refer to anything other than the city of Tyre, since the destruction of the “daughters” has already occurred.

Eze 26:7 For thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will bring upon Tyrus Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon, a king of kings, from the north, with horses, and with chariots, and with horsemen, and companies, and much people.
Eze 26:8 He shall slay with the sword thy daughters in the field: and he shall make a fort against thee, and cast a mount against thee, and lift up the buckler against thee.
Eze 26:9 And he shall set engines of war against thy walls, and with his axes he shall break down thy towers.
Eze 26:10 By reason of the abundance of his horses their dust shall cover thee: thy walls shall shake at the noise of the horsemen, and of the wheels, and of the chariots, when he shall enter into thy gates, as men enter into a city wherein is made a breach.

quote:
The majority of the people had moved by ship to an island about ½ miles off the coast and fortified a city there. The mainland city was destroyed in 573 BC, as predicted. The city of Tyre on the island remained a powerful city for several hundred years.
Here is some plain misdirection. The mainland city was Ushu, not the mainland city of Tyre.

quote:
Many nations against Tyre (Ezekiel 26:3).
Dad4Jesus seems to be projecting into the future when there is no indication within the text to do so. In 26:7, Ezekiel states that Nebuchadnezzar and his armies will be the tool of Tyre's destruction. Nebuchadnezzar was a great king ruling over an empire of many conquered and annexed nations. Ezekiel gives no reason to assume that these are not the “many nations” being referred to since there is no mention of empires or kingdoms other than that of Nebuchadnezzar's.

quote:
Make her a bare rock; flat like the top of a rock (Ezekiel 26:4).
Fishermen will spread their nets over the site (Ezekiel 26:5).
Never be rebuilt (Ezekiel 26:14).
Never be found again (Ezekiel 26:21) (2/285)”

Today, Tyre is not a bare rock, though fishermen may still spread their nets there. Plus, a quick check will assure us that Tyre has been rebuilt many times, an

"We got an issue in America. Too many good docs are gettin' out of business. Too many OB/GYNs aren't able to practice their -- their love with women all across this country." Dubya in Poplar Bluff, Missouri, 9/6/2004
Go to Top of Page

darwin alogos
SFN Regular

USA
532 Posts

Posted - 02/18/2003 :  19:03:18   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send darwin alogos a Private Message
Tim:
quote:
This statement seems to want to lower the expectations of the writer. A careful reading of the text shows that Ezekiel does
predict the demise of the mainland suburbs. Then, Ezekiel goes on to show that Nebuchadnezzar breaches the walls of Tyre.
Notice that nowhere does Ezekiel mention any other kings or generals invading Tyre since the introduction of the “king of
kings” until the breach of the walls, (and on to the end of this supposed prophecy). In the verses listed below,
Nebuchadnezzar is the only singular person referred to, and Tyre is the only individual city referred to. There is no reason to
assume that the pronoun “he” suddenly begins to refer to anyone other than Nebuchadnezzar, namely Alexander the Great.
Next, there is no reason to assume that the pronouns “thee” and “thy” refer to anything other than the city of Tyre, since
the destruction of the “daughters” has already occurred.
Tim read these (http://www.aboutbibleprophecy.com/tyre.htm,,,http://www.exchangedlife.com/skeptic/ezekiel.htm )Take two asprins and see me in the morning.

To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny?
Edited by - darwin alogos on 02/18/2003 19:06:32
Go to Top of Page

Tim
SFN Regular

USA
775 Posts

Posted - 02/20/2003 :  05:01:16   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tim a Private Message
Alright, DA…Let me try one more time. But, honestly man, I feel kind of silly putting all these people through elementary school grammar lessons. Did you actually read this tripe that you posted?

I don't have much time. So, I'll try to make this quick.

Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.
Now, that said, let's discuss context.

The crux of the argument in both of these web pages seems to be a very liberal use of the pronoun ‘they'. Where in this entire chapter is this pronoun antecedent to anything other than descriptions of Nebuchadnezzar's armies or seafaring princes lamenting the destruction of this island city?

Are we adding to the book?

These apologetics mention the evasive tactic of “many nations” refering to future conquerors. Here's a couple of little half baked maps from a couple of Christian operated web sites;
http://www.ebibleteacher.com/batlasweb/sld028.htm http://cofcnet.com/lib/books/daniel/babylonian_1.html
Just how many “nations” of 2,600 years ago do you think were a part of this empire? How about finding out by reading the books of 2Kings, 2Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Jeremiah and Daniel? And, considering the pool of strong men Nebuchadnezzar had to choose from, he certainly could have conceivably mounted an attack of wave after wave.

quote:
Nebuchadnezzar is not the "many nations" referenced in verse 3. Instead, he is the first of the "many nations" referenced in verse 3.
And, no matter how many times I read this chapter, I still can't find this in the text. DA, could you possibly bring yourself to at least giving me a hint where the bible tells us this?

Or, are we adding to the book?

The pronouns ‘he' and ‘thee' and ‘thy' were covered in my last post.

Are we adding to the book?

quote:
only the mainland of Tyre is addressed - never the island
Where does the bible say this? And, when did the suburbs of Tyre become the city of Tyre? These apologetics even confirm this by saying the modern city of Tyre is not in the same exact spot as the the city of 2,600 years ago. If the entire area adjacent to Tyre was Tyre proper, then the new city would still be on the same spot as the original city.

Are we adding to the book?

quote:
As for the claim that Ezekiel 29:17 is an admission from Ezekiel that his prophecy about Tyre failed, because Nebuchadnezzar did not get any loot from Tyre, take a look again at verses 7-11.
Then, this would not be a confirmation of the Macedonians and the later Muslims destroying Tyre, but rather a confirmation of a direct contradiction. You would have to add to the book to make this a prophecy confirmation.

Now, of course, you are going to argue that my use of Revelation 22:18 is taken out of context and that it only refers to the prophecies of the book of Revelation. You know, I might agree. However, I added nothing to this prophecy. I took it as written. I am not perfect, and cannot add to the inspirations of a perfect being. But, Christian apologists appear to be very adept at adding to the word of God. Must be a case of the student instructing the instructor?

quote:
It was the Phoenician Tyre that Ezekiel wa

"We got an issue in America. Too many good docs are gettin' out of business. Too many OB/GYNs aren't able to practice their -- their love with women all across this country." Dubya in Poplar Bluff, Missouri, 9/6/2004
Go to Top of Page

darwin alogos
SFN Regular

USA
532 Posts

Posted - 02/21/2003 :  20:58:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send darwin alogos a Private Message
Tim:
quote:


The crux of the argument in both of these web pages seems to be a very liberal use of the pronoun ‘they'. Where in this
entire chapter is this pronoun antecedent to anything other than descriptions of Nebuchadnezzar's armies or seafaring
princes lamenting the destruction of this island city?

Are we adding to the book?

These apologetics mention the evasive tactic of “many nations” refering to future conquerors. Here's a couple of little
half baked maps from a couple of Christian operated web sites;
http://www.ebibleteacher.com/batlasweb/sld028.htm http://cofcnet.com/lib/books/daniel/babylonian_1.html
Just how many “nations” of 2,600 years ago do you think were a part of this empire? How about finding out by reading
the books of 2Kings, 2Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Jeremiah and Daniel? And, considering the pool of strong men
Nebuchadnezzar had to choose from, he certainly could have conceivably mounted an attack of wave after wave.

quote:

Nebuchadnezzar is not the "many nations" referenced in verse 3. Instead, he is the first of the "many nations" referenced in
verse 3.


And, no matter how many times I read this chapter, I still can't find this in the text. DA, could you possibly bring yourself
to at least giving me a hint where the bible tells us this?
Before dealing with your objections that christians are adding meanings to the words 'he','they',and'many nations' let's look at some "undisputed"facts of history:
quote:
However, prosperity and power make
their own enemies. Early in the 6th Century BC Nebuchadnezzar,
King of Babylon, laid siege to the walled city for 13 years. Tyre
stood firm, but it is probable that at this time the residents of the
mainland city abandoned it for the safety of the Island. In 332 BC
Alexander the Great set out to conquer this strategic coastal base in
the war between the Greeks and the Persians. Unable to storm the
city, he blockaded Tyre for 7 months. Again Tyre held on. But the
conqueror used the debris of the abandoned mainland city to build a
causeway and once within reach of the city walls, Alexander used
his siege engines to batter and finally breach the fortifications.(http://almashriq.hiof.no/lebanon/900/910/919/sour/sour.html)...Tyre is an island. When it was under siege by Alexander, it was protected by high, heavy walls of stone. These walls were 2 miles in circumference and a half a mile
off shore. The height of these walls were 150 feet facing the shore, and they were stronger and thicker than any Alexander had ever attacked before. It had a strong
navy. Alexander soon realized its importance and thus decided to attack it.

Alexander's was not the first siege Tyre had seen. It had survived two sieges from the Assyrians. The first one lasted four years, from 701 to 679 B.C. The other
lasted nine years, this time from 671

To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny?
Go to Top of Page

darwin alogos
SFN Regular

USA
532 Posts

Posted - 02/21/2003 :  23:29:33   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send darwin alogos a Private Message
So Tim it seems that not only are my appeals to the difference in the use of 'He'(Neb.),'they' (Al and company) warranted by the grammar of the prophecy but when we look to history we find that it worked out exactly that way:
quote:
Issue #1 - Who Are "They"?

"They will plunder your wealth and loot your merchandise.." (NIV)

This verse is pivotal to many of the arguments of each side. Our side would say that the "they" in v. 12 refers back the "nations" in
v. 3-5, and were represented by Alexander the Great, who did the things described in v. 12, thus fulfilling the prophecy. Skeptics
and other critics, however, say that the "they" in v. 12 refers to the elements of Nebuchadnezzar's forces in verses 7 and 11.
Nebbie never did the things ascribed to "they," in verse 12 - he failed to take Tyre at all - so the prophecy, it is said, was not
fulfilled.

A key here is that the "they" in v. 12 can only refer to the "nations" in v. 3. Let's see how this is so.

Verse 3: The nations are mentioned.
Verse 4: The nations are referenced as "they."
Verse 7: Nebbie is introduced, along with his horses, chariots, horsemen, and army.
Verse 8: Says "HE will ravage your settlements on the mainland...HE will set up siege works against you (etc.)" At this point
we see the personification of Nebbie in his forces begin. Obviously, Nebbie did not PERSONALLY do the things described
while his army sat by and sipped coconuts.
Verse 9: says "HE will direct the blows of his battering ram..." Same as above; unless we want to argue that Nebbie only
used his personal battering ram which he didn't let anyone else use.
Verses 10-11: "His horses will be so many that they will cover you with dust. Your walls will tremble at the noise of the war
horses, wagons and chariots when HE enters your gates as men enter a city whose walls have been broken through. The
hoofs of his horses will trample all your streets; HE will kill your people with the sword, and your strong pillars will fall to the
ground." Here we see two more cases where Nebbie's forces are personified under singular references to himself.

Now the key verse:

Verse 12: "They will plunder your wealth and loot your merchandise..." We may note that this is the first recurrence of "they"
since verse 4. That this is so is a strong literary argument, even in English, that the subject of the "they" in verse 3, the
"nations," is also to be identified with the actors in v. 12. Skeptics would have us apply the "they" to the folks in v. 7. Aside
from the fact that these folks have already been subsumed under Nebbie's pronoun, "HE," we may ask skeptics why they do
not refer "they" to much closer words which agree in the plural sense and thus could be regarded as antecedents - for
example, the "horses, wagons, and chariots" described in verses 10-11.(http://www.tektonics.org/tekton_05_05_03.htm)

What is truly amazing is that inspite of this remarkable undeniable fulfillment you "skeptics" strain at gnats of this or that word but remain oblivious to the TRUTH staring you right at you. (ed for ref.)

To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny?
Edited by - darwin alogos on 02/21/2003 23:35:51
Go to Top of Page

Tim
SFN Regular

USA
775 Posts

Posted - 02/22/2003 :  06:49:05   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tim a Private Message
quote:
What is truly amazing is that inspite of this remarkable undeniable fulfillment you "skeptics" strain at gnats of this or that word
Ah, but true on occaision. At least, however, we don't pull them out of empty air, like mystical rabbits from a magician's hat!

When apologists cannot answer the questions presented, they invariably resort to obfuscation, while accusing skeptics of the same act.

DA, just answer my questions, and stop with these tactics of misdirection, and attempts to confuse the issue. Where in the entire text of the entire bible does any verse say that Alexander the Great, or Muslim Armies will destroy Tyre? Without this, your prophecy is at best 20/20 hindsight, and that's being nice. I can find no biblical reference giving one meaningful detail of either of these armies in connection with this alleged prophecy. Nor can I find a single reference even hinting that the destruction of Tyre should be a process happening in century long time frames, and over and over again. If this were the case, then this prophecy is not a prophecy at all, but simply a statement of the fact that all things must come to an end.

Again, please, answer my questions.
Does Tyre exist today? (Eze 26:4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20 & 21)
Is Tyre under water? (Eze 26:19)
Is Tyre in such a state of destruction that we cannot ever hope to find it? (Eze 26:21)
If the answer to any of these questions is "no," then your prophecy is unfulfilled.


"We got an issue in America. Too many good docs are gettin' out of business. Too many OB/GYNs aren't able to practice their -- their love with women all across this country." Dubya in Poplar Bluff, Missouri, 9/6/2004
Go to Top of Page

walt fristoe
SFN Regular

USA
505 Posts

Posted - 02/22/2003 :  11:13:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send walt fristoe a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by the_ignored

Just to fan the flames even more:
from: http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?postid=740288#post740288

quote:

The Tyre prophecies did indeed come to pass.

In the 26th chapter of Ezekiel (592-570 BC) seven things are predicted to happen to the city of Tyre:



1) Nebuchadnezzar will destroy the mainland of Tyre (Ezekiel 26:8).

2) Many nations against Tyre (Ezekiel 26:3).

3) Make her a bare rock; flat like the top of a rock (Ezekiel 26:4).

4) Fishermen will spread their nets over the site (Ezekiel 26:5).

5) Throw the debris into the water (Ezekiel 26:12).

6) Never be rebuilt (Ezekiel 26:14).

7) Never be found again (Ezekiel 26:21) (2/285)



Nebuchadnezzar laid siege to mainland Tyre three years after the prophecy and after a 13 year siege (585-573 BC) Tyre made terms and acknowledged Babylonian authority over them (4 xxii.452) When Nebuchadnezzar broke the gates down, he found the city almost empty. The majority of the people had moved by ship to an island about 1/2 miles off the coast and fortified a city there. The mainland city was destroyed in 573 BC, as predicted. The city of Tyre on the island remained a powerful city for several hundred years. (2/286)



Alexander the Great, in his war on Persia, marching southward called on each city to open their gates to him, as part of his plan to deny the use to the Persian fleet. Tyre refused to do so, and Alexander laid siege to the city. Possessing no fleet, he demolished old Tyre, on the mainland, and with the debris built a causeway 200 feet wide across the straits separating the old and new towns, erecting towers and war engines at the farther end. (4/xxii. 452) Tyre continually raided the causeway with fire-ships greatly retarding progress, until Alexander pressured conquered subjects to make ships for his operation. After attaining a superior naval force, Alexander finished the causeway, battered the walls of Tyre down killed eight thousand of the inhabitants and sold thirty thousand into slavery. (5/153)



A history book by a secular historian reads, "Alexander the Great ... reduced Tyre to ruins... The larger part of the site of the once great city is now bare as the top of a rock --- a place where fishermen now spread their nets to dry." (5/55)



Another historian, John C. Beck, says, "The history of Tyre does not stop with after the conquest of Alexander. Men continue to rebuild her and armies continue to besiege her walls, until finally after sixteen hundred years, she falls never to be rebuilt again." (6/41)



All the prophecies of Ezekiel about Tyre have come true: Nebuchadnezzar destroyed the mainland city of Tyre; Many nations were against Tyre; Alexander made her a bare rock and threw debris into the water to make the causeway; fishermen now spread nets over the site; (there is a city of Tyre today, but it is located down the coast from the original Tyre) the old city of Tyre has never been rebuilt, even though a great freshwater spring are located at the site, providing 10,000,000 gallons daily. It is still an excellent site today but has never been rebuilt, although many have tried. All seven of the predictions came true in the minutest detail.




I would submit that this "prophecy" does not meet all of the criteria previously mentioned. Specifically, 1, 2, and 3.

"If God chose George Bus of all the people in the world, how good could God be?"
Bill Maher
Go to Top of Page

darwin alogos
SFN Regular

USA
532 Posts

Posted - 02/22/2003 :  16:25:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send darwin alogos a Private Message
Tim:
quote:
DA, just answer my questions, and stop with these tactics of misdirection, and attempts to confuse the issue. Where in the entire text of the entire bible does any verse say that Alexander the Great, or Muslim Armies will destroy Tyre?
What on earth are you smoking Tim? The text was written ove 200 years before Alexander PREDICTS WITH PRECISION how he will destroy the Island city and your griping because you can't find "any verse say that Alexander the Great,give me a breakp.s .The Text states"many nations"

To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny?
Edited by - darwin alogos on 02/22/2003 16:27:28
Go to Top of Page

darwin alogos
SFN Regular

USA
532 Posts

Posted - 02/23/2003 :  10:30:48   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send darwin alogos a Private Message
walt fristoe:
quote:
I would submit that this "prophecy" does not meet all of the criteria previously mentioned. Specifically, 1, 2, and 3.
So the fact that: 1.'many nations' were "predicted to be involved"(and history bears witness that they were);2.that the 'mainland city' would be conqured by Neb.(and it was);3.that the next conqueror would 'take the debris left by Neb. on the mainland and literally throw it in the sea to build a causeway to the island city'(and it "literally" happened this way).So walto your claiming that not "clear" or "contain sufficient detail ect..."(#1) really,just how walt? Also you don't think the events described above are "unusual or unique"(#2)? And finally, to cover your bases you now claim (#3) that the "prophecy" might have been written after the events?

To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny?
Go to Top of Page

walt fristoe
SFN Regular

USA
505 Posts

Posted - 02/23/2003 :  15:25:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send walt fristoe a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by darwin alogos

And finally, to cover your bases you now claim (#3) that the "prophecy" might have been written after the events?




I think that with "documents" of such antiquity we can't be sure when they were written, nor can we be sure that they were even written by the author named in the title. For instance, the book of Isaiah was written by at least two people.

"If God chose George Bus of all the people in the world, how good could God be?"
Bill Maher
Go to Top of Page

ConsequentAtheist
SFN Regular

641 Posts

Posted - 02/23/2003 :  15:37:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ConsequentAtheist a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by walt fristoe

For instance, the book of Isaiah was written by at least two people
I'm always interested in Documentary Hypothesis specifics. Could you supply substantiation?

For the philosophical naturalist, the rejection of supernaturalism is a case of "death by a thousand cuts." -- Barbara Forrest, Ph.D.
Go to Top of Page

walt fristoe
SFN Regular

USA
505 Posts

Posted - 02/23/2003 :  15:52:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send walt fristoe a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by ConsequentAtheist

quote:
Originally posted by walt fristoe

For instance, the book of Isaiah was written by at least two people
I'm always interested in Documentary Hypothesis specifics. Could you supply substantiation?



Here is a site that discusses Second and Third Isaiah.

"If God chose George Bus of all the people in the world, how good could God be?"
Bill Maher
Go to Top of Page

darwin alogos
SFN Regular

USA
532 Posts

Posted - 02/24/2003 :  17:55:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send darwin alogos a Private Message
DA:Well here is at least on honest atheist who doesn't try and hedge his bets after the fact:
quote:
Ezekiel


<Back to Last Page > <Glossary Index>

Profile:
Name: Book of Ezekiel (Hebrew: laqzhy, "God strengthens")
Author: the Prophet Ezekiel
Dating: early 6th century BCE

Book of Ezekiel:
The book of Ezekiel recounts the story of Ezekiel (whose name means "God strengthens" and who is
counted among the three major prophets), a prophet who predicted the downfall of Judah and was
the first of the prophets to live outside of the Jewish promised land, having been exiled to Babylon
along with many others.

Writing in the early 6th century BCE, he was probably one of the Temple priests who, after his dire
predictions went unheeded, tried to give comfort to the other Jews who lived with him in exile. Upon
their return, he also worked to promote the kinds of laws and purity which, he hoped, would prevent
similar disasters in the future.

One of the prophecies Ezekiel has become well known for is his description of God and Magog.
According to Ezekiel, Gog was a nation to the north from which a prince, Magog, would arise and
attack the Jews. He would be defeated and, as a result, the Jewish god would be acknowledged as
the one, true god by all people. Christian writers later took this to be a reference to a coming
apocalypse and the author of Revelation identified Magog as being part of a Satanic force. (http://atheism.about.com/library/glossary/western/bldef_ezekiel.htm)


To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny?
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 9 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.41 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000