quote:

---

Originally posted by verlch
My dad is a creation scientist and I know that is going to upset Dr. Sassafrass...but he says evolution if correct is like throwing 100 pennies in the air and having them all land heads!!!! And I believe him of my own free will, I have looked at evolution and dismissed it as garbage. What are the chances of 100 pennies landing heads? Almost zero. I don't know what rocket scientist funded all you evolutions but that fella must be rich.

---

quote:

---

One of the things which disproves the global flood are the minor normal activities of life and living which are abundantly clear in the fossil record. Today we will discuss coprolites or fossilized feces.

Coprolites comes from the Greek word, kopros, meaning dung. We find lots of dung in the fossil record and it says many things about the global flood and its impossibility. First, it says that the world could not be flooded by water all the time, because the animals would not be able to find food and after about 5 days, most animals would not have anything left in their digestive tracks. This means that as the flood went on, from the time when the Cambrian strata were deposited, on up to the Permian (half way through the flood) and into the Cretaceous and Tertiary (late in the flood deposition), there should be no vertebrate dung because the world had been flooded for more than 6 months by then. To find coprolites in the later sediments of the flood, means that the animal ate within 5 days of when he eliminated.

---

quote:

---

Strangely enough Pterosaurs which were very strong flyers did not make it to the mountains. These light weight creatures are only found in strata with the massive dinosaurs. Not one of these animals is found in conjunctions with mammals or modern birds.
I bet the odds of that happening would be the same as throwing a hand full of pennies in the air and having them all land heads up!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by verlch

http://www.nature.com/nsu/030120/030120-7.html

Yes a four winged bird, you would think that was evolving? No? Why are there not six winged birds now and why is that one gone? I mean if things are evolving who makes the calls and sets the boundries?

My dad is a creation scientist and I know that is going to upset Dr. Sassafrass...but he says evolution if correct is like throwing 100 pennies in the air and having them all land heads!!!! And I believe him of my own free will, I have looked at evolution and dismissed it as garbage. What are the chances of 100 pennies landing heads? Almost zero. I don't know what rocket scientist funded all you evolutions but that fella must be rich.

http://www.icr.org/pubs/btg-b/btg-003b.htm

There you have it debate over....Lol...Jk'ing...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by filthy

Well, being as how this thread has pretty much gone to pot anyway, let's take a look at what's inside that smelly, ol' thunder mug:

quote:

---

One of the things which disproves the global flood are the minor normal activities of life and living which are abundantly clear in the fossil record. Today we will discuss coprolites or fossilized feces.

Coprolites comes from the Greek word, kopros, meaning dung. We find lots of dung in the fossil record and it says many things about the global flood and its impossibility. First, it says that the world could not be flooded by water all the time, because the animals would not be able to find food and after about 5 days, most animals would not have anything left in their digestive tracks. This means that as the flood went on, from the time when the Cambrian strata were deposited, on up to the Permian (half way through the flood) and into the Cretaceous and Tertiary (late in the flood deposition), there should be no vertebrate dung because the world had been flooded for more than 6 months by then. To find coprolites in the later sediments of the flood, means that the animal ate within 5 days of when he eliminated.

---

http://home.entouch.net/dmd/bathroom.htm

There is a photo of a petrified turtle turd included.

I strongly reccommend reading the whole thing. It is excellent. It was researched and written by Glenn Morton, an oil field geologest and ex-YEC.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by verlch

Also, I read somewhere that our galaxy is on a collision course toward Andromeda -- someone correct me if I recall that wrong.


And you said I had a doomsday attitude! So where is that comet or Astroid coming from ?

---

quote:

---

http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/natural_history_2_08.html

How do you explain that many of the fossilized birds have the same structure in the bones as modern birds?

---

quote:

---

http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/natural_history_2_09.html

Dino bird proven to be a fake!!!

---

quote:

---

http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/natural_history_2_10.html

Yes why have things not changed that much? OR at all for that matter?

---

quote:

---

http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/natural_history_2_11.html

http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/natural_history_2_12.html

See the horse gradually growing!! What does that mean? I don't get it?

---

quote:

---

http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/natural_history_2_13.html

In order for the bat to work properly all its systems have to be in place!!!! Nothing gradually happens there!

---

quote:

---

http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/natural_history_2_14.html

That is why I don't like evolution, it tells stories of how things should be, and you fellas have to regard them as fact.

---

quote:

---

http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/natural_history_2_14.html

That is why I don't like evolution, it tells stories of how things should be, and you fellas have to regard them as fact.

---

quote:

---

In many evolutionist sources, it is asserted that the ancestors of cetaceans left the land and evolved into marine mammals over a long period of time. Accordingly, marine mammals followed a path contrary to the transition from water to land, and underwent a second evolutionary process, returning to the water. This theory both lacks paleontological evidence and is self-contradictory.

---

quote:

---

These facts once more indicate for certain that neither Archaeopteryx nor other ancient birds similar to it were transitional forms. The fossils do not indicate that different bird species evolved from each other. On the contrary, the fossil record proves that today's modern birds and some archaic birds such as Archaeopteryx actually lived together at the same time. It is true that some of these bird species, such as Archaeopteryx and Confuciusornis, have become extinct, but the fact that only some of the species that once existed have been able to survive down to the present day does not in itself support the theory of evolution.

---

quote:

---

A yet more sensational case of dino-bird hype broke out in 1999. In its November 1999 issue, National Geographic published an article about a fossil specimen unearthed in China which was claimed to bear both bird and dinosaur features. National Geographic writer Christopher P. Sloan, the author of the article, went so far as to claim, "we can now say that birds are theropods just as confidently as we say that humans are mammals." This species, which was said to have lived 125 million years ago, was immediately given the scientific name Archaeoraptor liaoningensis. \l "139"


However, the fossil was a fake and was skillfully constructed from five separate specimens. A group of researchers, among whom were also three paleontologists, proved the forgery one year later with the help of X-ray computed tomography. The dino-bird was actually the product of a Chinese evolutionist. Chinese amateurs formed the dino-bird by using glue and cement from 88 bones and stones. Research suggests that Archaeoraptor was built from the front part of the skeleton of an ancient bird, and that its body and tail included bones from four different specimens.

---

quote:

---

Creatures such as spiders, ticks, and millipedes are not insects, but rather belong to other subphyla of Arthropoda. Important fossil discoveries of these creatures were communicated to the 1983 annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The interesting thing about these 380-million-year-old spider, tick, and centipede fossils is the fact that they are no different from specimens alive today. One of the scientists who examined the fossils remarked that, "they looked like they might have died yesterday." \l "143"
Winged insects also emerge suddenly in the fossil record, and with all the features peculiar to them. For example, a large number of dragonfly fossils from the Pennsylvanian Age have been found. And these dragonflies have exactly the same structures as their counterparts today.

---

---

"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

quote:

---

It just proves things are buried really quickly!!!! Nothing less.

Yes and I am sure the turtle hasn't changed any to modern turtles!!!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by verlch

Also, I read somewhere that our galaxy is on a collision course toward Andromeda -- someone correct me if I recall that wrong.


And you said I had a doomsday attitude! So where is that comet or Astroid coming from ?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by verlch

Also, I read somewhere that our galaxy is on a collision course toward Andromeda -- someone correct me if I recall that wrong.


And you said I had a doomsday attitude! So where is that comet or Astroid coming from ?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

quote:

---

Originally posted by verlch

Also, I read somewhere that our galaxy is on a collision course toward Andromeda -- someone correct me if I recall that wrong.


And you said I had a doomsday attitude! So where is that comet or Astroid coming from ?

---

Obviously, since the article about our galaxy on a "collision course toward Andromeda" was probably written by an Evolutionist, I guess you only read the headline and dismissed the rest of the article just like one should expect from any Good Christian, since scientists are employed by Satan to turn the Faithful away from the glory of God, right?

If you had read the article of which you saw the headline, you would have been informed that it was talking about M31, the galaxy in the constellation of Andromeda, and not a comet or asteroid.

---