Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 General Skepticism
 Proposal #2
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 07/30/2004 :  21:50:05   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
Well, I see an improvement here, he listened to our replies, thought about it, and then retracted his originial statement. Coberst, making correct claims is not at all being a critical thinker. However, making claims, backing them up, and retracting them if found to be incorrect is being a critical thinker.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 07/30/2004 :  22:54:18   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
Dang. We appear to be slacking on our links to the Bad Astronomy Bulletin Board. And wow! they took coberst to pieces for his bit on Idealism for having an extremely bizarre definition of the word (something we all missed here). And he hasn't responded to the charges of plagiarism of Licoln at Gettysburg: the Words that Remade America in his Lincoln at Gettysburg thread over there.

Ricky, he might be improving, or it may be that coberst is just humoring us. Considering the inconsistencies between his words and actions, there's no telling what his motivations are for posting here (and at BABB, and Philosophy Forums, and Physics Forums, and Univeralists, and elsewhere).

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

coberst
Skeptic Friend

182 Posts

Posted - 07/31/2004 :  06:37:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit coberst's Homepage Send coberst a Private Message
I appreciate the audience!
Go to Top of Page

coberst
Skeptic Friend

182 Posts

Posted - 07/31/2004 :  07:35:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit coberst's Homepage Send coberst a Private Message
For those not familiar with C-SPAN: C-SPAN has a number of features, one feature is a morning call in show in which a guest “expert” talks briefly about a point and audience calls are taken. The expert replies to questions called in about the particular matter of the expert's expertise.

Let us imagine something similar in an Internet forum. A group of ‘experts' are prepared to respond to questioners who enter a question to the forum on a particular topic (ethics—stem cell research for example). After the expert has answered, the thread is ready game for any and all.

This certainly would have a very modest response in the beginning but perhaps it might develop. You gotta think big!
Go to Top of Page

N C More
Skeptic Friend

53 Posts

Posted - 07/31/2004 :  08:11:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send N C More a Private Message
coberst said:
quote:
I appreciate the audience!


Now, this says it all!

"An open mind is like an open window...without a good screen you'll get some really weird bugs!"
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 07/31/2004 :  18:06:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
coberst wrote:
quote:
Let us imagine something similar in an Internet forum. A group of ‘experts' are prepared to respond to questioners who enter a question to the forum on a particular topic (ethics—stem cell research for example). After the expert has answered, the thread is ready game for any and all.
This is, more-or-less, the standard operating procedure here at the Skeptic Friends Network. We don't have many experts, but we do have plenty of able and willing researchers who teach themselves enough to answer most questions.

In other words, we don't really need to imagine any such thing. We've already got it.

And the Straight Dope Message Boards "General Questions" forum is explicitly that sort of forum. This is not a new idea.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

coberst
Skeptic Friend

182 Posts

Posted - 08/01/2004 :  13:23:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit coberst's Homepage Send coberst a Private Message
Dave

Your negative angel jumped right out there. Now your ego will fight any attempt you might make to flip-flop.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 08/01/2004 :  17:25:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
I'm being negative by saying that what you've just now imagined has already been acheived?

Just how would I flip-flop on this issue, anyway? By doing more of what I already do? It's not my ego which would fight that, but my paycheck.

And actually, it is your negative angel who's jumped out, demonstrated by your inability to do anything in that post but criticize me. Evidence of positive verbs or adjectives is completely lacking.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 08/02/2004 :  02:04:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by coberst

Dave

Your negative angel jumped right out there. Now your ego will fight any attempt you might make to flip-flop.

What negative angle?

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

coberst
Skeptic Friend

182 Posts

Posted - 08/02/2004 :  05:19:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit coberst's Homepage Send coberst a Private Message
Dave

It seems to me there are six possible ways to react when encountering a new idea.

1 Noncommittal open mind
2 Noncommittal closed mind
3 Negative closed mind
4 Positive closed mind
5 Negative open mind
6 Positive open mind

I think that (1) is the best way, (3) is the worst way and (2) is the most common way.

Go to Top of Page

coberst
Skeptic Friend

182 Posts

Posted - 08/02/2004 :  05:24:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit coberst's Homepage Send coberst a Private Message
Dr Mabuse

Dave understands what a negative angel is. The negative angel is the automatic response many people make to a new idea before they have had time to understand it. The negative angel also comes out when the individual has studied the matter and found the idea to be unsound. So the negative angle can be used in both a positive or a negative situation.
Go to Top of Page

SciFi Chick
Skeptic Friend

USA
99 Posts

Posted - 08/02/2004 :  05:41:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send SciFi Chick a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by coberst

Dave

It seems to me there are six possible ways to react when encountering a new idea.

1 Noncommittal open mind
2 Noncommittal closed mind
3 Negative closed mind
4 Positive closed mind
5 Negative open mind
6 Positive open mind

I think that (1) is the best way, (3) is the worst way and (2) is the most common way.





If you present a new idea, I'm certain Dave W will react appropriately, as we all will. However, you have yet to present a new idea.

Let me say this again. What you presented IS NOT A NEW IDEA!!! It already exists. For someone to tell you that something you wish for already exists IS NOT NEGATIVE!!! Learn to comprehend what you are reading!!!!!!!!!!!

"There is no 'I' in TEAM, but there is an 'M' and an 'E'." -Carson

"Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud."
-Sophocles
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 08/02/2004 :  05:55:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
Coberst, it maybe a new idea to you, but when all the forums reply to you with the same "You are presenting nothing new to us", its not a conspiracy, its just not a new idea.u

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

coberst
Skeptic Friend

182 Posts

Posted - 08/02/2004 :  06:35:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit coberst's Homepage Send coberst a Private Message
Of course, a new idea, like beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It appears to be human nature to do a turtle before they know what is going on. However, if one does a turtle while also doing a negative then one cannot later do a flip-flop because the ego will not permit it. Write this all down we may have an exam later.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 08/02/2004 :  06:45:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
coberst wrote:
quote:
It seems to me there are six possible ways to react when encountering a new idea.
When you present a new idea, I will make sure to point it out, coberst. My reaction, by the way, was clearly #6 on your list, but you - negatively - fail to recognize it as such. You are the one who has been exhibiting reaction #3, through intent, simple naïveté, or some other form of ignorance of the facts.
quote:
Dave understands what a negative angel is. The negative angel is the automatic response many people make to a new idea before they have had time to understand it. The negative angel also comes out when the individual has studied the matter and found the idea to be unsound. So the negative angle can be used in both a positive or a negative situation.
Yeah, and I have quite a bit of experience with your "new idea," and find it works really well. Since that does not fit with your definition of a "negative angel," I must not have displayed a negative angel, right? Please retract your previous comments, "Your negative angel jumped right out there. Now your ego will fight any attempt you might make to flip-flop." They are inaccurate, and you know it, because you demonstrated how wrong those comments are.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000