Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Earth's Age Wildly Inaccurate
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

GeeMack
SFN Regular

USA
1093 Posts

Posted - 08/24/2005 :  21:39:45  Show Profile Send GeeMack a Private Message
Geology is among my many interests. Although I am a rank amateur, I find earthquakes intriguing and enjoy reading about current seismic activity. We have a potentially dangerous fault here in the Midwest, at about New Madrid, Missouri, near the southern tip of my state, Illinois. I often check the data on nearby quakes and those near Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, because I enjoy traveling out there every few years. Lately I've also noticed much activity coming from Mt. St. Helens in Washington, northwestern USA.

While looking up current information on Mt. St. Helens, the search engine sometimes hits on scattered pages written by the nescient faithful. From their point of view we are being duped by the vast majority of modern geological scientists. Sound familiar? Fortunately these "researchers" have seen through the sham and endeavor to bring us closer to the truth.

You'll recognize the simple strategy. Poke a few pin holes in a theory, find a few little inconsistencies, and voila! Completely invalidate all scientific evidence supporting the theory. Of course this proves in turn that the only other possible explanations come straight from the Bible. Oh, us silly humans. Why do we even waste our time on scientific pursuits? The answers have been laying right there in front of us the whole time!

Find one of these articles here... 'Ages' obtained for the lava dome of Mt St Helens, by A. J. Monty White
quote:
The data from the potassium-argon dating of the dacite lava from Mount St Helens should help us understand -- the age of the earth determined by radiometric dating may be wildly inaccurate and cannot be trusted. There is no convincing evidence that the earth is billions of years old.

By contrast, the Word of God can be trusted when it points to a recent creation. God was there when he created and he has revealed this to us in the pages of Scripture.

[...]

A. J. Monty White BSc, PhD, CChem, MRSC is a chemistry graduate who also studied geology at university. Following a career in university administration at Cardiff University, Monty joined Answers in Genesis (UK/Europe) as Chief Executive in 2000.
No convincing evidence, eh? Well, if you say so. After all, you studied geology at university.

CourseKnot
Skeptic Friend

USA
82 Posts

Posted - 08/25/2005 :  12:14:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send CourseKnot a Private Message
I think alot of people have a problem with comprehending time on a geologic and cosmic scale. It's hard enough for some to think in terms of thousands of years let alone billions. It's easier to think that God created everything a long unspecified time ago than to bust a brain cell trying to understand reality.

Just flying through space with the rest of you...
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 08/25/2005 :  12:57:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message
This sounds like the typical bullshit of a YEC. No Geologist would try to use K-Ar to date lava from Mt. St Helens!!
quote:
As the simulation of the processing of potassium-argon samples showed, the standard deviations for K-Ar dates are so large that resolution higher than about a million years is almost impossible to achieve. Potassium-argon dating is accurate from 4.3 billion years (the age of the Earth) to about 100,000 years before the present.

Some moron probably collected a sample and sent it for analysis to prove his point. I guess it is OK to be a lie if it is to save a soul.



If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

Jumbo
New Member

24 Posts

Posted - 08/26/2005 :  02:15:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Jumbo a Private Message
It very much looks like a case of finding one, either flaw or just misunderstanding one piece of evidence and then declaring all other evidence invalid. Of course if the evidence is invalid it must be that 'godditit'. The if i dont understand it then it must have been done by magic is something i find disturbing enough in the general populace but given this gentleman has been employed for decades in the university i graduated from im gob smacked. Im just thankful it appears he didnt hold a teaching position in Cardiff.

The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be lighted
Go to Top of Page

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 08/26/2005 :  03:15:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
The always useful Index to Creationist Claims, by Mark Isaak:
Now available in book form : The Counter-Creationism Handbook



Claim CD013: - Potassium-argon dating of rocks from lava flows known to be modern gave ages millions to billions of years older.
Claim CD013.1:The conventional K-Ar dating method was applied to the new lava dome at Mount St. Helens, Washington. These ages show that the K-Ar method is invalid.



Welcome to SFN, Jumbo!

"Any religion that makes a form of torture into an icon that they worship seems to me a pretty sick sort of religion quite honestly"
-- Terry Jones
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 08/26/2005 :  03:17:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Greetings Courseknot and Jumbo. Welcome to SFN!

The great fallicy here is that there in no emperical evidence for the existance of any sort of god(s). AiG is merely pulling their no-eye-witness gag again, claiming that the authors of Genesis were such. A good shoot-down for it is to point out that the fossil record is such an order that it can be and is used as an index for the history of life on earth, and it is in the order predicted by the ToE. If someone lays this on you, ask them, whilst trying not to giggle, to produce the Devonian Bunny. The legendary lagomorph will remain a legend, and the reply will be blather.

It is also a good argument, one of many, against the Great Big Fat Flood silliness. If such a flood had happened, the fossils of all species would be found in all strata in a jackstraw confusion.

Even PhDs who should know better have intellectual blind spots, but I sometimes wonder at the number of chemists and MDs with this particular one.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

beskeptigal
SFN Die Hard

USA
3834 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2005 :  00:53:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send beskeptigal a Private Message
It's a big lie and it gets spouted about by the believers who eat that stuff up. Try and find any collaborating evidence or even legit science journal publication and you find none. A google search for the original research gives you only the AIG and like minded sites.
Go to Top of Page

chaloobi
SFN Regular

1620 Posts

Posted - 09/15/2005 :  06:49:31   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send chaloobi a Yahoo! Message Send chaloobi a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by GeeMack
<snip>
While looking up current information on Mt. St. Helens, the search engine sometimes hits on scattered pages written by the nescient faithful. From their point of view we are being duped by the vast majority of modern geological scientists. Sound familiar? Fortunately these "researchers" have seen through the sham and endeavor to bring us closer to the truth.
<snip>

It's common knowledge that Geology is the work of Satan the Deciever. And you? Well, you are a pawn of his Unholiness. Repent lest ye suffer the fate of the evil victims of Katrina! Repent!

-Chaloobi

Edited by - chaloobi on 09/15/2005 07:02:46
Go to Top of Page

SLP
New Member

5 Posts

Posted - 09/15/2005 :  10:43:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit SLP's Homepage Send SLP a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Jumbo

It very much looks like a case of finding one, either flaw or just misunderstanding one piece of evidence and then declaring all other evidence invalid. Of course if the evidence is invalid it must be that 'godditit'.


Exactly true, and exactly ridiculous. Any time I read/hear such an argument strategy - two radiometric dates do not exactly coincide, therefore, the earth REALLY is 6000 years old! - I am at a totla loss of words, such is my stupefaction at such stupidity. And yet, that sort of 'logic' pervades creationist writings.

I am undecided whether it is sad or disgusting.

Both?
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.2 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000