|
Donnie B.
Skeptic Friend
417 Posts |
 Posted - 03/19/2002 : 13:50:11
|
The brand-new issue (4/02/2002) of Natural History magazine just arrived, and it contains an interesting set of articles.
It consists of three short essays by leading lights of the ID movement - Behe, Dembski, and Wells - with matching rebuttals by Kenneth R. Miller, Robert T. Pennock, and Eugenie C. Scott (respectively).
Also included is a brief introduction to the controversy by the editors, and closing remarks by philosopher Barbara Forrest.
All in all, it's a devastating critique of ID, with the proponents' positions thoroughly discredited by the rebuttals. But then, I could be a bit biased... 
I recommend it as good ammunition for anyone who may engage in debate or discussion on the issue. If anyone else reads it I'd be interested in your opinion.
-- Donnie B.
Brian: "No, no! You have to think for yourselves!" Crowd: "Yes! We have to think for ourselves!"
|
|
Topic Locked
