|
|
|
CRUX
BANNED
192 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 06:01:02 [Permalink]
|
DaveW has trouble thinking things through. To understand how deep the inability is:
As soon as you can pass your dyed hair color on to your children (through only the act of having children), then you can call it a characteristic as the biologists mean it.
Learned or acquired features are not characteristics. Otherwise, every scar or blemish would be a speciation event. Characteristics must be hereditable. |
OK. Apart from his insistence that he is speaking as a biologist does about characteristics...I wonder how paleos determine a "characteristic"'s heritability before they know it is heritable ( since the things they study often cannot be observed now ..breedings etc ). What a bone head.
What is a speciation event ? It is when any change that is heritable, occurs in any individual, as DaveW thinks ? How could anyone be both so stupid and ignorant, and then at the same time attempt to play games with others' words, hoping to discredit the reasoning ? |
 |
|
|
Fripp
SFN Regular
USA
727 Posts |
 Posted - 09/28/2011 : 06:06:36 [Permalink]
|
To crux:
Listen fuckstick, apologize to Dave. You are a liar and now you're being a gutless turd coward.
Answer Dave's MohammedGoldstein question (and any others you pussied out of answering).
I repeat, you are a cowardly, sniveling fuckstick liar. And yes, that is an insult... an insult you've earned.
For fuck's sake you are a little pussy asshole. |
"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"
"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"
"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?" |
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 06:34:31 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by CRUX
DaveW has trouble thinking things through. To understand how deep the inability is:As soon as you can pass your dyed hair color on to your children (through only the act of having children), then you can call it a characteristic as the biologists mean it.
Learned or acquired features are not characteristics. Otherwise, every scar or blemish would be a speciation event. Characteristics must be hereditable. |
OK. Apart from his insistence that he is speaking as a biologist does about characteristics...I wonder how paleos determine a "characteristic"'s heritability before they know it is heritable ( since the things they study often cannot be observed now ..breedings etc ). What a bone head. |
Your ignorance does not make me a bonehead.| ...attempt to play games with others' words, hoping to discredit the reasoning ? |
I never once did any such thing. Your reasoning is bad on its face, and no semantic fiddling is needed to show it.
Now quit evading the tasks you have set for yourself. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
|
CRUX
BANNED
192 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:05:30 [Permalink]
|
how do paleos determine what characteristics there are, if no info on heritability is there?
When they find something new, they just have to admit that there are no characteristics to describe. Right ? |
|
|
|
CRUX
BANNED
192 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:09:44 [Permalink]
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciation
to see if a speciation event occurs when an INDIVIDUAL has a mark somehow resembling a tiny BLEMISH, that is heritable.
the fellas are peddling tripe here.
|
| Edited by - CRUX on 09/28/2011 07:12:05 |
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:16:30 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by CRUX
how do paleos determine what characteristics there are, if no info on heritability is there?
When they find something new, they just have to admit that there are no characteristics to describe. Right ? |
...So you find something shiny and distracting, and suddenly forget about everything else. Do you think we've forgotten your accusations just because you've decided to throw more insults and lies around?
Actually, the fact that you suddenly want to continue MuhhamedGoldstein's argument coupled with the fact that you refuse to answer a simple question about your own identity says volumes. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
|
Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend
Sweden
9688 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:17:16 [Permalink]
|
| Fripp, you're not helping. |
Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3
"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse
Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder. |
|
|
|
CRUX
BANNED
192 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:23:42 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse
Fripp, you're not helping.
|
That is not a warning. |
|
|
|
justintime
BANNED
382 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:25:23 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by CRUX
DaveW has trouble thinking things through. To understand how deep the inability is:
As soon as you can pass your dyed hair color on to your children (through only the act of having children), then you can call it a characteristic as the biologists mean it.
Learned or acquired features are not characteristics. Otherwise, every scar or blemish would be a speciation event. Characteristics must be hereditable. |
OK. Apart from his insistence that he is speaking as a biologist does about characteristics...I wonder how paleos determine a "characteristic"'s heritability before they know it is heritable ( since the things they study often cannot be observed now ..breedings etc ). What a bone head.
What is a speciation event ? It is when any change that is heritable, occurs in any individual, as DaveW thinks ? How could anyone be both so stupid and ignorant, and then at the same time attempt to play games with others' words, hoping to discredit the reasoning ?
|
DaveW. Great questioning. You are breaking through to CRUX. CRUX is starting to see you are basing your questioning from a biologist position.
CRUX wrote
OK. Apart from his insistence that he is speaking as a biologist does about characteristics... |
Now he is asking about paleos because he does not know the difference in disciplines. CRUX's confusion is going rampant with your line of questioning. I said earlier CRUX is looking to be educated here that is why most of his responses are questions. He does not know their relevance and connection. Nor does he care how many times he is proven wrong. He just needs to prove you wrong once to get his jolly's up. CRUX lives off scraps.
CRUX wrote
I wonder how paleos determine a "characteristic"'s heritability before they know it is heritable |
|
|
|
|
justintime
BANNED
382 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:35:59 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Fripp
To crux:
Listen fuckstick, apologize to Dave. You are a liar and now you're being a gutless turd coward.
Answer Dave's MohammedGoldstein question (and any others you pussied out of answering).
I repeat, you are a cowardly, sniveling fuckstick liar. And yes, that is an insult... an insult you've earned.
For fuck's sake you are a little pussy asshole.
|
We are all witness to this great travesty Fripp. We also share the same frustration with the dementia CRUX is exhibiting.
So long as DaveW knows he is doing the honorable thing and knows we can see the tremendous patience he is showing. We can only salute him for his efforts. |
| Edited by - justintime on 09/28/2011 07:38:20 |
|
|
|
Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie
USA
4826 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:37:31 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by CRUX
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse
Fripp, you're not helping.
|
That is not a warning.
|
He also didn't accuse the staff of being unethical without evidence.
The warnings continue to be for accusing staff of unethical behavior without evidence.
If I do not see from you evidence that DaveW acted unethically within the next two days, I will be voting for you to be banned. Had you trotted out that accusation on any other board, you would be hard-pressed to find one that would not have banned you sooner.
Again, it's put up or shut up time, CRUX. What happens next is based on your responses over the next two days. |
Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils
Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion |
|
|
|
CRUX
BANNED
192 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:45:12 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer
Originally posted by CRUX
Plus it's blameworthy to leave Dr. mabuse's improper badgering and threatening posts unattended to, and same with some of VD's posts. ( Since Dr Mabuse made an error, his estimation of the state of affairs should be struck for sure. There were plenty of insults but only I got warnings ). The doubling and tripling demand and warning posts are nothing but team flak.
That, you get blamed for if you don't show it nullified.
However, you probably could care less about being blamed there. The other blame, for a failure to anticipate an unusual circumstance, in planning for staff access and mistakes and *human nature* to not lose an argument...is less pointed.
good nite
|
The warnings were not for insults.
They were for accusing staff of ethical breaches without evidence.
We were acting in our roles as forum moderators.
|
forum Moderators Acting Badly.
As Dr Mabuse said, proper searching work is time consuming to ensure everything is correctly reported. Meanwhile Dave throws a hundred accusations up ( figuratively )gives make-work projects etc.
It's only exaggerating a bit to say that even a punctuation mark missing might be Dave's opening to spin.
To demand delivery is one thing. To pile on threats and warnings is another. (All the while ignoring and even encouraging insults from The Team, by showing it's acceptable).
That's why the demand itself was unreasonable, when repeated. |
| Edited by - CRUX on 09/28/2011 07:48:38 |
|
|
|
Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie
USA
4826 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:48:45 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by CRUX
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer
Originally posted by CRUX
Plus it's blameworthy to leave Dr. mabuse's improper badgering and threatening posts unattended to, and same with some of VD's posts. ( Since Dr Mabuse made an error, his estimation of the state of affairs should be struck for sure. There were plenty of insults but only I got warnings ). The doubling and tripling demand and warning posts are nothing but team flak.
That, you get blamed for if you don't show it nullified.
However, you probably could care less about being blamed there. The other blame, for a failure to anticipate an unusual circumstance, in planning for staff access and mistakes and *human nature* to not lose an argument...is less pointed.
good nite
|
The warnings were not for insults.
They were for accusing staff of ethical breaches without evidence.
We were acting in our roles as forum moderators.
|
forum Moderators Acting Badly.
As Dr Mabuse said, proper searching work is time consuming to ensure everything is correctly reported. Meanwhile Dave throws a hundred accusations up ( figuratively )gives make-work projects etc.
It's only exaggerating a bit to say that even a punctuation mark missing might be Dave's opening to spin.
To demand delivery is one thing. To pile on threats and warnings is another. (All the while ignoring and even encouraging insults from The Team, by showing it's acceptable).
|
I suppose the whole "burden of proof is on the claimant" thing is right over your head.
This does not bode well for you. |
Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils
Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion |
|
|
|
CRUX
BANNED
192 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:51:47 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer
Originally posted by CRUX
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse
Fripp, you're not helping.
|
That is not a warning.
|
He also didn't accuse the staff of being unethical without evidence.
The warnings continue to be for accusing staff of unethical behavior without evidence.
If I do not see from you evidence that DaveW acted unethically within the next two days, I will be voting for you to be banned. Had you trotted out that accusation on any other board, you would be hard-pressed to find one that would not have banned you sooner.
Again, it's put up or shut up time, CRUX. What happens next is based on your responses over the next two days.
|
nevertheless, it is tolerated. open season, you see, is always the response. Dave sets up the incorrect information, fabricates the strawman or other misrepresentation. Kil demands the member reply to the question "When did you stop beating your wife". He hands it to Executioner Dave, who has also prepared a timeline !
Problem solved. |
| Edited by - CRUX on 09/28/2011 07:55:48 |
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 09/28/2011 : 07:59:08 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by CRUX
Dave sets up the incorrect information, fabricates the strawman or other misrepresentation. |
Unsupportable lies. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
 |
|
If I get a haircut 2
