Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 The Big Sort - the political polarization of USA
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

marfknox
SFN Die Hard

USA
3739 Posts

Posted - 07/07/2008 :  11:56:18  Show Profile  Visit marfknox's Homepage  Send marfknox an AOL message Send marfknox a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I just heard on NPR's "Talk of the Nation" an interview with author Bill Bishop on his new book "The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart." It is all about how our self-selecting communities help re-enforce our opinions and even exaggerate them, making us less able to work together. Obviously this issue seems of great importance to skeptics. I suggest checking out the interview. I hope to read the book soon and post a review here.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92292747

"Too much certainty and clarity could lead to cruel intolerance" -Karen Armstrong

Check out my art store: http://www.marfknox.etsy.com


Edited by - marfknox on 07/07/2008 11:56:58

Mycroft
Skeptic Friend

USA
427 Posts

Posted - 07/08/2008 :  01:29:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Mycroft a Private Message  Reply with Quote
It seems to me, and this is only my perception, that it used to be that people who disagreed on political issues could discuss, debate and argue in a friendly way, and it was easy to understand the other persons point of view even if you didn't agree.

Now it seems like it always has to be more personal. If you disagree with someone it's not just because you see things differently, but it's because you're evil, and you want bad things to happen. If you don't see things exactly from the other person's point of view it must be because secretly you're a pedophile, Nazi, torturer, or whatever really evil label seems appropriate.
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 07/08/2008 :  07:35:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Mycroft said:
It seems to me, and this is only my perception, that it used to be that people who disagreed on political issues could discuss, debate and argue in a friendly way, and it was easy to understand the other persons point of view even if you didn't agree.

Now it seems like it always has to be more personal. If you disagree with someone it's not just because you see things differently, but it's because you're evil, and you want bad things to happen. If you don't see things exactly from the other person's point of view it must be because secretly you're a pedophile, Nazi, torturer, or whatever really evil label seems appropriate.

Well, at least we agree on one thing.

The level of public discourse has deteriorated to the point where its almost impossible to make fun of it with caricature.

The fault is difficult to assign to any one specific group too. I think its a combination of tabliod-like news media (nearly all of them have become this, imo), the anti-intellectual movement (mostly right-wing), the apathy of most US citizens (something like half don't bother to vote...), and the movement of batshit bugfucking crazy religious organizations into politics (Falwell, Robertson, Dobson, et al)


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 07/08/2008 :  11:21:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well said, Mycroft. But it must be remembered that political discussions are never expected to be friendly, merely civil. As long as civility remains in place, friendships will recieve only a little strain.

It has been said that politics and religion break up more friendly relationships than anything else. I see little room for argument over that.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 07/08/2008 :  12:43:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The only time I really get offended and angry at a person in political discourse is when I find reasonable evidence to suggest they are being dishonest or just arguing for the sake of arguing (having no interest in the actual topic).

There is one exception. An uncle of mine, ultra-conservative-Orielly-lover, absolutely loves to argue over politics. I tried talking to him a few times, but he continually gets into a gish gallop. So instead, all I do is come up with a few things to say that I know will set him off. One of the things that really got him going a few weeks ago was, "You know, communism isn't that bad for a form of governmnet." If I remember correctly, the end result was him claiming that the ACLU was founded by "commies".

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Edited by - Ricky on 07/08/2008 12:43:59
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 07/08/2008 :  13:26:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
One of my best friends in a Christian fundamentalist and a political conservative to the max. And yes, we debate often. And yet, we also have a lot in common which is what we mostly focus on. I think he is wrong-wrong-wrong with regard to his politics. And he thinks I am too.

The good news is that we both like to debate.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000