Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 Curiouser'n curiouser....
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 10/17/2008 :  05:21:26  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Remember, a while back, when rumors & speculations were floating around about McCain and a foxy, blond lobbiest named Viki Isner? Well, Ms. Isner vanished from the radar screen shortly afterward and everyone forgot about it. Until, that is, now, when we get a reminder:
Thursday, October 16, 2008
"I did not have a sexual relationship with Senator McCain"
John Aravosis (DC) · 10/16/2008 07:57:00 PM ET · Link
47 Comments · reddit · FARK · Digg It! · Stumble It!



From AP:
A female telecommunications lobbyist who became part of an explosive story early this year about John McCain has broken months of silence to deny the main subtext of the account — that she was suspected of being romantically involved with the Republican presidential candidate. "I did not have a sexual relationship with Senator McCain," Vicky Iseman told the National Journal magazine.
Um, something smells here. (Not to mention, why give a quote that sounds eerily like Bill Clinton during the Monica affair?)
I'm inclined to agree wirh Aravosis: whaddafork is this? Further down the article, he makes some interesting speculations as to "whaddafork."

Me, I don't care if McCain was getting a little extra-curricular poon in his spare time. None of my business, really, and if Cindy can live with it, everyone else should be able to as well. But like Aravosis, I must ask: why is this chippy popping up out of the murky grey sky, with her rather hollow (and all too familiar) denials at this late date?

We must await developments -- it might turn out to be interesting, not to come out and say fun to watch.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

chaloobi
SFN Regular

1620 Posts

Posted - 10/17/2008 :  06:01:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send chaloobi a Yahoo! Message Send chaloobi a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by filthy

Remember, a while back, when rumors & speculations were floating around about McCain and a foxy, blond lobbiest named Viki Isner? Well, Ms. Isner vanished from the radar screen shortly afterward and everyone forgot about it. Until, that is, now, when we get a reminder:
Thursday, October 16, 2008
"I did not have a sexual relationship with Senator McCain"
John Aravosis (DC) · 10/16/2008 07:57:00 PM ET · Link
47 Comments · reddit · FARK · Digg It! · Stumble It!



From AP:
A female telecommunications lobbyist who became part of an explosive story early this year about John McCain has broken months of silence to deny the main subtext of the account — that she was suspected of being romantically involved with the Republican presidential candidate. "I did not have a sexual relationship with Senator McCain," Vicky Iseman told the National Journal magazine.
Um, something smells here. (Not to mention, why give a quote that sounds eerily like Bill Clinton during the Monica affair?)
I'm inclined to agree wirh Aravosis: whaddafork is this? Further down the article, he makes some interesting speculations as to "whaddafork."

Me, I don't care if McCain was getting a little extra-curricular poon in his spare time. None of my business, really, and if Cindy can live with it, everyone else should be able to as well. But like Aravosis, I must ask: why is this chippy popping up out of the murky grey sky, with her rather hollow (and all too familiar) denials at this late date?

We must await developments -- it might turn out to be interesting, not to come out and say fun to watch.




#1. I'm with you. I don't care if he's fooling around on the side. Like all things sexual (w/ consenting adults) it's nobody's business but the consenting adults.

#2. McCain looks terrible and is damn near a cripple. How's he get all the blond bimbos? From what I understand, his wife brings to money to the table, so what does she or any other BB see in him?

EDIT: Regarding your citizen signatures - they're ok. I don't dislike them and they cause a head scratch occasionally. I don't see any reason to discontinue unless you're spending too much time on them or something...

-Chaloobi

Edited by - chaloobi on 10/17/2008 06:02:51
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 10/17/2008 :  06:20:48   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Head-scratching is good. It shows thoughts in process and keeps the livestock stirred up.

I don't want to drop my little People of Interest project altogether, but it doesn't really fit in a signature, especally with a picture (which is the attention-grabber). And Dave has informed me that it screws up the foremat on smaller screens. So, I'm still undecided and Teddy'll be the last. For a while.....

As to Ms. Isner, her reappearence smacks of some sort of political shennagan, perhaps a distraction or just another McCain stunt , that isn't going to work.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Simon
SFN Regular

USA
1992 Posts

Posted - 10/17/2008 :  07:22:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Simon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well... I heard about these rumours before (not sure if she was named).

Even if the rumours were not all that publicized as far as the general public is concerned, it makes sense that people in her entourage would have a special interest in it and that the story would be much more prevalent in the circles closer to her.

So, she might have geared that denial toward her acquaintances and it got picked up by a national medium.


Not that I care, really, I have enough REAL reasons not to like the GOP for.

Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there – on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
Carl Sagan - 1996
Go to Top of Page

chaloobi
SFN Regular

1620 Posts

Posted - 10/17/2008 :  07:40:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send chaloobi a Yahoo! Message Send chaloobi a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by filthy

Head-scratching is good. It shows thoughts in process and keeps the livestock stirred up.

I don't want to drop my little People of Interest project altogether, but it doesn't really fit in a signature, especally with a picture (which is the attention-grabber). And Dave has informed me that it screws up the foremat on smaller screens. So, I'm still undecided and Teddy'll be the last. For a while.....

As to Ms. Isner, her reappearence smacks of some sort of political shennagan, perhaps a distraction or just another McCain stunt , that isn't going to work.




I don't see how it can benefit him to remind everyone about rumors of his infidelity.... of course I never would have believed Sarah Palin would have benefited his campaign either. In fact, I still don't believe it.

-Chaloobi

Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000