Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Swiss Ban Building of Minarets
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5

Jayhawker Soule
New Member

21 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  04:21:48   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Jayhawker Soule a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule
Furthermore, the proposition:
the majority of X are N,
therefore X is characteristic of N

is a pretty pathetic fallacy.
I missed that one.
Why am I not surprised?

Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

Please name the fallacy so I can google it properly.
Cum hoc ergo propter hoc

Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

Thanks.
You're welcome.
Go to Top of Page

Jayhawker Soule
New Member

21 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  04:26:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Jayhawker Soule a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

No, the press releases of these groups are not reflective of a large percentage of Christians in Switzerland. Other than petty bigotry, this fact provides zero basis for concluding that the ban is "reflective" of Christians in general, much less Christianity.
Actually, it adds to a large pile of evidence that religious people treat each other poorly.
In fact, there is "a large pile of evidence that ... people treat each other poorly." What is unacceptable is that you submit this 'evidence' to support a bigoted presupposition.
Go to Top of Page

Jayhawker Soule
New Member

21 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  04:28:48   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Jayhawker Soule a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Bob Lloyd

Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

Originally posted by Bob Lloyd

It's interesting that whereas the news shows the influence of social and religious bigotry, the discussion seems to have revolved around accusations about one or other religious group line. It really doesn't matter what the political line of the religious institutions was. The problem is that, as ever, religion is the spur for prejudice.

The Islamophobic reaction seen in Switzerland is not fundamentally different from that seen in France and the Netherlands. The common denominator is not religion but national chauvinism and fear.
Judaism insists that they are the chosen race, ...
That is a pathetically stupid and antisemitic statement.
Go to Top of Page

Jayhawker Soule
New Member

21 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  04:30:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Jayhawker Soule a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by filthy

... All major religions are totalitarian by nature; "only we have the correct view and all the rest of you will rot in.... (nasty place/whatever of choice)."
You continue to embarrass yourself ...
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  05:02:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

In fact, there is "a large pile of evidence that ... people treat each other poorly."
Yes, there is that, also. But do you have evidence that what occurred in France, the Netherlands and Switzerland would still have happened in the absence of both Christianity and Islam?
What is unacceptable is that you submit this 'evidence' to support a bigoted presupposition.
How is it bigoted? How is it a presupposition?

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  05:13:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

Originally posted by filthy

... All major religions are totalitarian by nature; "only we have the correct view and all the rest of you will rot in.... (nasty place/whatever of choice)."
You continue to embarrass yourself ...
Odd, I don't feel embarrassed. Are you a professional quote-miner or is it merely a hobby?

Here's an idea: why not refute the post rather than indulge in ad hom nonsense?




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Jayhawker Soule
New Member

21 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  05:46:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Jayhawker Soule a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

In fact, there is "a large pile of evidence that ... people treat each other poorly."
Yes, there is that, also. But do you have evidence that what occurred in France, the Netherlands and Switzerland would still have happened in the absence of both Christianity and Islam?
True: in the absence of Christianity and Islam there would almost certainly have been no ban on minarets. Very incisive, Dave!
Go to Top of Page

Jayhawker Soule
New Member

21 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  05:47:48   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Jayhawker Soule a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by filthy

Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

Originally posted by filthy

... All major religions are totalitarian by nature; "only we have the correct view and all the rest of you will rot in.... (nasty place/whatever of choice)."
You continue to embarrass yourself ...
Odd, I don't feel embarrassed.
I'm not surprised ...
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  05:57:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

Originally posted by filthy

Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

Originally posted by filthy

... All major religions are totalitarian by nature; "only we have the correct view and all the rest of you will rot in.... (nasty place/whatever of choice)."
You continue to embarrass yourself ...
Odd, I don't feel embarrassed.
I'm not surprised ...

Odd, I don't feel embarrassed. Are you a professional quote-miner or is it merely a hobby?

Here's an idea: why not refute the post rather than indulge in ad hom nonsense?





"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  07:05:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by filthy

A few things I did not know about minarets:

They are, as we are aware, intended for a muezzin to call the faithful to prayer, or at least they used to be. These days they, like most Christian church steeples, are pretty much decorative and any calls are done through loud-speakers, saving wear & tear on the muezzin's knees and shoes, if not his larynx.

The call, in Muhammad's day, were made from the roof of the tallest, near-by building. In later years, minarets were attached to the mosque and built as tall as feasible so that they could serve as a guiding beacon to the traveler, and to mark territory.
The oldest minaret in the world is in Kairouan, Tunisia. Built between 724 and 727, it has a massive square form. The tallest minaret in the world is that of the new Hassan II Mosque in Casablanca, Morocco, which stands 210 meters tall. Minarets were built to be “landmarks of Islam” — to be visible from afar and to stamp an area with Islamic character.


Interesting, no?

I hated living in Syria and being woken up every day at ca. 4 am by the calls to prayer. After awhile, I started to wonder about the effects of sleep deprivation on the ability to brainwash and I started to have more respect (in a twisted way) for Muhammad.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  07:32:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

True: in the absence of Christianity and Islam there would almost certainly have been no ban on minarets. Very incisive, Dave!
Evasion of the point (and follow-up questions) doesn't support your assertions, so I take it you're just here to fling abuse around.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 12/09/2009 :  08:49:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote

Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule
Furthermore, the proposition:
the majority of X are N,
therefore X is characteristic of N

is a pretty pathetic fallacy.

Ok, inserting Christianity and "not moral" I get:

the majority of Christianity are "not moral",
therefore Christianity is characteristic of "not moral"
In other words, you're saying that Dave wrote (paraphrased):
A majority of Christians are not moral,
therefore: Christianity is an attribute that most immoral people have.

Edited to inject (in blue): Re-reading the statement above, with my experience of christians both IRL and online, doesn't ring all that untrue...

Which is not how I interpreted Dave's post.

I missed that one.
Why am I not surprised?

Well, you obviously think you're smart, while at the same time thinking I'm stupid.
So why don't you explain to me in more detail and in simpler language:

Firstly, how the "the majority of Christianity are "not moral",
therefore Christianity is characteristic of "not moral"
" can become a Cum hoc ergo propter hoc.

Secondly, how Dave's "I'm arguing that the numbers suggest that defending people of other religions is not characteristic of Christians, despite the teachings of Jesus Christ" can even become a non causa pro causa.



Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Edited by - Dr. Mabuse on 12/09/2009 08:56:44
Go to Top of Page

Bob Lloyd
Skeptic Friend

Spain
59 Posts

Posted - 12/10/2009 :  08:11:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Bob Lloyd's Homepage Send Bob Lloyd a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

Originally posted by Bob Lloyd

Originally posted by Jayhawker Soule

Originally posted by Bob Lloyd

It's interesting that whereas the news shows the influence of social and religious bigotry, the discussion seems to have revolved around accusations about one or other religious group line. It really doesn't matter what the political line of the religious institutions was. The problem is that, as ever, religion is the spur for prejudice.

The Islamophobic reaction seen in Switzerland is not fundamentally different from that seen in France and the Netherlands. The common denominator is not religion but national chauvinism and fear.
Judaism insists that they are the chosen race, ...
That is a pathetically stupid and antisemitic statement.


No it's not!! What an outrageous suggestion!! You should use the word antisemitic very carefully because my comment is in no way antisemitic. It is a fact that the Torah, the Jewish holy book, is seen as the authoritative religious source of the claim that the Jewish people, amongst the Israelite tribes, were the chosen people. Rabinical scholars have always cited Deuteronomy 7:6 as being one of the authoritative source:

"For you are a people consecrated to the LORD your God: of all the peoples on earth the LORD your God chose you to be his treasured people."

It goes on of course, to explain that the land is being cleared for them by God, and that they should give no quarter to anyone who won't leave - an argument that modern Zionists continually use to justify the expulsion of the Palestinians.

Such comments are not anti-Jewish. Very many Jewish people deplore such Zionism. Maybe it's important to explain that criticising religious ideas is perfectly acceptable and doesn't involve prejudice. Religious ideas are not exempt from criticism and I strongly object to the claim that I am antisemitic.

You are factually wrong but worse, you are trying to use the word antisemitic to stiffle discussion. I've read the Torah, the Bible (yes, all of it) and the Qur'an - perhaps you should do the same. On the Christian book genealogy, I'd recommend Regis Debray's book God: An Itinerary, a bit of a heavy read, but certainly a good antidote to flippant accusations of antisemitism.
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 12/10/2009 :  10:22:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Odd. Jayhawker Soule hasn't bothered to hurl at insult at me. Oh wait. I haven't contributed to this thread...


Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.16 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000