Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 Poll: Scott Brown to Win Massachusetts
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 7

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  07:51:09   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Bill scott
If Barack Obama were running against Abraham Lincoln then who would have won?


Zombies always win.

I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

Fripp
SFN Regular

USA
727 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  08:53:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fripp a Private Message  Reply with Quote

If Barack Obama were running against Abraham Lincoln then who would have won?


Typical avoidance tactic that I have come to expect from you. Your Obama/Lincoln question is nonsensical (surprise, surprise).

Answer the question: Yes or No?

Your claim that voters were voting AGAINST Obama is b***sh*t. Don't forget that Mass already has Universal health care. Brought in by Mitt Romney and voted FOR by Scott Brown.

As per usual Bill, you've brought nothing to the table except empty bumper-sticker dogma.

"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"

"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"

"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?"
Edited by - Fripp on 01/22/2010 08:55:44
Go to Top of Page

ThorGoLucky
Snuggle Wolf

USA
1487 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  09:04:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ThorGoLucky's Homepage Send ThorGoLucky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by podcat

Congratulations, Scott Brown. You won. Here's a fair and balanced biography of Senator-elect Scott Brown:

http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/colbert-report-massachusetts-special-elect

Oh, who am I kidding? It's Stephen Colbert. Scott Brown will be in the Senate for two years, plenty of time to have fun with him. :P

Massachusetts isn't a Democratic state, it's a handsomcratic state.
Go to Top of Page

Fripp
SFN Regular

USA
727 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  09:07:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fripp a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Bill scott

Originally posted by Fripp

My point is that this was NOT a referendum on ObamaCare, but rather a vote on specific candidates, i.e "against" Coakley.

The Right needs to simplify issues to bumper sticker statements and reduce arguments from thousands of shades of gray into neat black-and-white choices.


We will see come November. So far is Barack is 0-3. He campaigns in Virgina and they elect a repub. Governor. He campaigns in New Jersey and they elect a repub. Governor. He campaigns in Massachusetts and they elect a repub to fill Teddy's seat. Do you see a trend here?


Argumentum Ad Populum.

Hitler's Nazi Party got voted into power. Segregationists got voted into power. Certainly doesn't mean that either was on the "right" side of history.

So far Bill, your 0-2. Come on, I'm not even trying.

BTW, inquiring minds want to know: when are you ever going to answer Dave W's question regarding gay marriage? My guess is never.

"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"

"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"

"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?"
Go to Top of Page

Fripp
SFN Regular

USA
727 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  09:28:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fripp a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I will give you one thing: that Scott Brown and his nude centerfold is precisely the kind of candidate that the Repubs want nowadays, given their (Repubs) scandalous problems with marital fidelity and closeted homosexuality.

That's family values isn't it? But hey, he drives a TRUCK!!!

Was there any mention of his five rental properties including a time-share in Aruba?

You conservatives crack me up. You vote for a guy simply because he's good-looking, drives a truck, and spouts the party-line talking points.

"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"

"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"

"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?"
Go to Top of Page

bngbuck
SFN Addict

USA
2437 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  09:47:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bngbuck a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Bill scott.....

In my humble opinion this was 20% a vote for Scott Brown and an 80% vote against the federal government. Looking at the polls and interviews the people are sick and tired of business as usual in Washington.
Congratulations, Bill, you have found yourself another succubus sponsor besides Dave W.......Me!

I totally agree with your statement I quoted above.

I am a way left liberal Democrat, and the politician that I am most pissed off at in the world is Barack Obama. He has blown it more completely than the whole damn crew at the Mustang ranch could have done in a solid week of cockservice.

This idiotic dreamer had it all - prez office, filibuster proof Senate, huge majority in the House, and an adoring public - and now the Limbaugh Legions are running roughshod over him - in the polls, in the Senate, in Pelosi's palace, and in the court of public opinion.

He's starting to look like a dumber asshole than Junior Bush was, and that puts him in the same intelligence range as your average tapeworm!

You Creative Conservatives certainly play the political game a hell of a lot better than we dumbass Democrats do!! Where can I enroll in Fundamentalist Fools and Conservative Cretins College? I need a successful political perspective!
Go to Top of Page

Bill scott
SFN Addict

USA
2103 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  10:32:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Bill scott a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Fripp

I will give you one thing: that Scott Brown and his nude centerfold is precisely the kind of candidate that the Repubs want nowadays, given their (Repubs) scandalous problems with marital fidelity and closeted homosexuality.

That's family values isn't it? But hey, he drives a TRUCK!!!

Was there any mention of his five rental properties including a time-share in Aruba?

You conservatives crack me up. You vote for a guy simply because he's good-looking, drives a truck, and spouts the party-line talking points.


Dude, they could have run Micky Mouse and won the race. This was not a vote for Brown as much as it was against Obama. Note to incumb. dems. don't bring the prez in to campaign for you or doomed, if your not doomed already. If you doubt me then wait till November. The writing is on the wall.

"Lets get one thing clear, Bill. Science does make some assumptions." -perrodetokio-

"In the end as skeptics we must realize that there is no real knowledge, there is only what is most reasonable to believe." -Coelacanth-

The fact that humans do science is what causes errors in science. -Dave W.-

Go to Top of Page

Bill scott
SFN Addict

USA
2103 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  10:33:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Bill scott a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by bngbuck

Bill scott.....

In my humble opinion this was 20% a vote for Scott Brown and an 80% vote against the federal government. Looking at the polls and interviews the people are sick and tired of business as usual in Washington.
Congratulations, Bill, you have found yourself another succubus sponsor besides Dave W.......Me!

I totally agree with your statement I quoted above.

I am a way left liberal Democrat, and the politician that I am most pissed off at in the world is Barack Obama. He has blown it more completely than the whole damn crew at the Mustang ranch could have done in a solid week of cockservice.

This idiotic dreamer had it all - prez office, filibuster proof Senate, huge majority in the House, and an adoring public - and now the Limbaugh Legions are running roughshod over him - in the polls, in the Senate, in Pelosi's palace, and in the court of public opinion.

He's starting to look like a dumber asshole than Junior Bush was, and that puts him in the same intelligence range as your average tapeworm!

You Creative Conservatives certainly play the political game a hell of a lot better than we dumbass Democrats do!! Where can I enroll in Fundamentalist Fools and Conservative Cretins College? I need a successful political perspective!


I know nothing about you but you come off as a bitter old man.

"Lets get one thing clear, Bill. Science does make some assumptions." -perrodetokio-

"In the end as skeptics we must realize that there is no real knowledge, there is only what is most reasonable to believe." -Coelacanth-

The fact that humans do science is what causes errors in science. -Dave W.-

Go to Top of Page

Bill scott
SFN Addict

USA
2103 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  11:29:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Bill scott a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Fripp


If Barack Obama were running against Abraham Lincoln then who would have won?


Typical avoidance tactic that I have come to expect from you. Your Obama/Lincoln question is nonsensical (surprise, surprise).

Answer the question: Yes or No?

Your claim that voters were voting AGAINST Obama is b***sh*t. Don't forget that Mass already has Universal health care. Brought in by Mitt Romney and voted FOR by Scott Brown.

As per usual Bill, you've brought nothing to the table except empty bumper-sticker dogma.


Your Obama/Lincoln question is nonsensical (surprise, surprise).


As nonsensical as Ted vs. Scott.

"Lets get one thing clear, Bill. Science does make some assumptions." -perrodetokio-

"In the end as skeptics we must realize that there is no real knowledge, there is only what is most reasonable to believe." -Coelacanth-

The fact that humans do science is what causes errors in science. -Dave W.-

Go to Top of Page

Bill scott
SFN Addict

USA
2103 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  11:35:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Bill scott a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Fripp

Originally posted by Bill scott

Originally posted by Fripp

My point is that this was NOT a referendum on ObamaCare, but rather a vote on specific candidates, i.e "against" Coakley.

The Right needs to simplify issues to bumper sticker statements and reduce arguments from thousands of shades of gray into neat black-and-white choices.


We will see come November. So far is Barack is 0-3. He campaigns in Virgina and they elect a repub. Governor. He campaigns in New Jersey and they elect a repub. Governor. He campaigns in Massachusetts and they elect a repub to fill Teddy's seat. Do you see a trend here?


Argumentum Ad Populum.

Hitler's Nazi Party got voted into power. Segregationists got voted into power. Certainly doesn't mean that either was on the "right" side of history.

So far Bill, your 0-2. Come on, I'm not even trying.

BTW, inquiring minds want to know: when are you ever going to answer Dave W's question regarding gay marriage? My guess is never.



Argumentum Ad Populum.

Hitler's Nazi Party got voted into power. Segregationists got voted into power. Certainly doesn't mean that either was on the "right" side of history.



So what? I simply said this was a vote against Obama. Nothing about Scott Brown being on the right side of history or the Nazi Party. Those were your ramblings.

"Lets get one thing clear, Bill. Science does make some assumptions." -perrodetokio-

"In the end as skeptics we must realize that there is no real knowledge, there is only what is most reasonable to believe." -Coelacanth-

The fact that humans do science is what causes errors in science. -Dave W.-

Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  12:54:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Bill scott

Originally posted by Fripp

I have a simple question for you, Bill: if Scott Brown was running against Ted Kennedy, who would have won?

If Barack Obama were running against Abraham Lincoln then who would have won?
If Obama had been running against Abe Lincoln, Obama would probably have been hanged in the nearest tree by a confederate mob.


Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

Bill scott
SFN Addict

USA
2103 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  13:03:49   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Bill scott a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

Originally posted by Bill scott

Originally posted by Fripp

I have a simple question for you, Bill: if Scott Brown was running against Ted Kennedy, who would have won?

If Barack Obama were running against Abraham Lincoln then who would have won?
If Obama had been running against Abe Lincoln, Obama would probably have been hanged in the nearest tree by a confederate mob.




So Lincoln wins?

"Lets get one thing clear, Bill. Science does make some assumptions." -perrodetokio-

"In the end as skeptics we must realize that there is no real knowledge, there is only what is most reasonable to believe." -Coelacanth-

The fact that humans do science is what causes errors in science. -Dave W.-

Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2010 :  14:38:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I hate to interrupt this fascinating, intellectual discussion, but I've just been handed a memo....

Well, it wasn't really for me -- it never is -- but here it is anyway:
A memo on what happened in Mass., and how Dems should proceed
by John Aravosis (DC) on 1/22/2010 02:15:00 PM

An interesting read. This memo was just distributed to all Senate chiefs of staff:

Let up hope that the chiefs of staff take heed and finally get their trained monkeys to do the right thing.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Fripp
SFN Regular

USA
727 Posts

Posted - 01/23/2010 :  06:47:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fripp a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Bill scott

Dude, they could have run Micky Mouse and won the race.


Really? So a 52% for Brown vs 48% for Coakley means that anyone with an R behind their name would have won? Interesting. Well, I've never known you to let facts get in the way of an argument before, so why change now.

I will say this: Mickey Mouse would have been a more substantive candidate than Brown. I'll admit that the Dems dropped the ball on this, big time. Coakley ran a pathetic campaign.

This was not a vote for Brown as much as it was against Obama. Note to incumb. dems. don't bring the prez in to campaign for you or doomed, if your not doomed already.


Again, don't let facts get in the way, Bill. After Obama campaigned on her behalf, Coakley's numbers went UP. Not enough, obviously, but they went up. And Obama's still has very favorable poll numbers in Mass.

If you doubt me then wait till November. The writing is on the wall.


Maybe, maybe not. We'll see...

By the way, I see that you've still ignored the Kennedy v Brown question...

And Dave is still waiting for an answer to his question regarding gay marriage. Could it be that your claims have no basis in reality?

"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"

"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"

"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?"
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 01/23/2010 :  07:15:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
What it is, everyone, including myself, is so pissed at the Democrats and the castrated HC bill that the Coakley loss should come as no real surprise. But as pissed at the Dems as they might be, polls find that they still loath Repubs, and said Repubs have no one to blame but themselves and the tiresome teabaggers.

But no worries; five douchebags on the Supreme Court have fixed it for them.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision Thursday, ruled that limits on the amount of money corporations, labor unions and other groups can directly spend on political campaigns is a violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. In a stunning reversal of the nation’s federal campaign finance laws, the court’s overturning of a 20-year-old ruling is seen as a stunning decision which is likely to challenge similar limits imposed by 24 states:

This will turn every politician extant into a cheap whore, a status all too many many of them are already intimately familiar with.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page
Page: of 7 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.17 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000