Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Pseudoscience
 Archaeological Fraud At Treblinka
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 17

LizW
Skeptic Friend

USA
113 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  17:21:52   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send LizW a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by LizW

I'm back. Has he given any answers yet?
No, he hasn't.

Ok...I'll come back later and check again.

You learn something new every g****mn day!
Go to Top of Page

Rumtopf
Banned

126 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  17:26:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Rumtopf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
My questions to Liz W:

What information do you have that makes you answer - YES - to the following question:

Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__

What are your thoughts on those people who answer - NO - to the question?
Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 17:28:19
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  17:27:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Rumtopf

Dave W's answer - MOOT (i.e. - ZERO.)
"i.e." means id est, or "that is," or "in other words." i.e., Your "fix" maintains the lie that you've been repeating.
Rumtopf's answer - He will answer as Kil summons up the integrity to answer.
Kil is displaying great integrity by first saying that he's not going to answer you and then not answering you. He's doing exactly what he said he'd do. Were he to answer you, that would show a lack of integrity.

Welcome to "Remedial English for Rumtopf." Quizzes will be given daily.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  17:28:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Rumtopf

My question to Liz W:
She's already said that she's not going to answer you until you reveal your answers. Do you think that Liz has less integrity than Kil?

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Rumtopf
Banned

126 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  17:29:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Rumtopf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Dave W:

"Kil is displaying great integrity by first saying that he's not going to answer you and then not answering you. He's doing exactly what he said he'd do. Were he to answer you, that would show a lack of integrity."


Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 17:32:09
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  17:33:09   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Rumtopf

Yes, why don't you think?

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

LizW
Skeptic Friend

USA
113 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  17:36:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send LizW a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Answers yet?

You learn something new every g****mn day!
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  17:36:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by LizW

Answers yet?
Nope.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

LizW
Skeptic Friend

USA
113 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  17:53:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send LizW a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Rumtopf hasn't responded for awhile. I think we won!



You learn something new every g****mn day!
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  17:54:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by LizW

Rumtopf hasn't responded for awhile. I think we won!
Don't count your chickens, yadda-yadda.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

On fire for Christ
SFN Regular

Norway
1273 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  22:02:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send On fire for Christ a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Rumtopf

On fire for christ:

Do you deny the above irrefutable fact? Yes. - or - No. __?__



Nope, as far as I'm aware she found pits using radar or similar devices. No actual excavation has been done, so how would remains be unearthed?

Is anyone disputing that?

Go to Top of Page

Rumtopf
Banned

126 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  22:23:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Rumtopf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Ok, Let's see how the debate is going here. (Sorry for being away for a while, but a person has to eat.)

So let me do a quick update with all the answers that have been given to date by everyone and we can get at it again. (Isn't debating fun?!)


# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__

Dave W's answer - No.

Liz W's answer - Yes.

Kil's answer - He can't summon up the integrity to answer.

Rumtopf's answer - He will answer as soon as Kil summons up the integrity to answer.

On fire for christ's answer - __?__

Dr. Mabuse's answer - __?__


# 2 - At Treblinka II, it is known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that, to date, no more than and no less than __?__ extant graves have been discovered, in which legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators have - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented forensic science - literally / truly - physically unearthed / tangibly located - actual, verifiable, scientifically proven human remains.

Dave W's answer - MOOT (i.e. - ZERO.)

Liz W's answer - Infinity.

Kil's answer - He can't summon up the integrity to answer.

Rumtopf's answer - He will answer as soon as Kil summons up the integrity to answer.

On fire for christ's answer - __?__

Dr. Mabuse's answer - __?__


# 3 - Is it true or false that, at - Treblinka II - there were actual trash and/or trash burning pits and/or latrine pits / trenches and/or water wells that were dug / used as such by the Germans - during their time of occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__

Dave W's answer - __?__

Liz W's answer - False.

Kil's answer - He can't summon up the integrity to answer.

Rumtopf's answer - He will answer as soon as Kil summons up the integrity to answer.

On fire for christ's answer - __?__

Dr. Mabuse's answer - __?__


# 4 - Is it true or false that, at - Treblinka II - there were numerous exploratory excavations dug by so-called “robbery diggers / treasure seekers,” and/or by Soviet / Polish investigators - after the time of German occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__

Dave W's answer - __?__

Liz W's answer - False.

Kil's answer - He can't summon up the integrity to answer.

Rumtopf's answer - He will answer as soon as Kil summons up the integrity to answer.

On fire for christ's answer - __?__

Dr. Mabuse's answer - __?__


# 5 - Is it true or false that, extraneous cremation remains have been deposited at - Treblinka II - after the time of German occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__

Dave W's answer - __?__

Liz W's answer - False.

Kil's answer - He can't summon up the integrity to answer.

Rumtopf's answer - He will answer as soon as Kil summons up the integrity to answer.

On fire for christ's answer - __?__

Dr. Mabuse's answer - __?__

* * * * *

* It is an irrefutable fact that “archaeologist” Caroline Sturdy Colls did not actually locate / prove the existence of a single real grave that contains the remains of so-much-as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies.

Do you deny the above irrefutable fact? - Yes. - or - No. __?__

Dave W's answer - No.

Liz W's answer - __?__

Kil's answer - He can't summon up the integrity to answer.

Rumtopf's answer - He will answer as soon as Kil summons up the integrity to answer.

On fire for christ's answer - No.

Dr. Mabuse's answer - __?__


* Do you have any proof of mass graves at Treblinka? - Yes. - or - No. __?__

Dave W's answer - __?__

Liz W's answer - __?__

Kil's answer - __?__

Rumtopf's answer - No.

On fire for christ's answer - __?__

Dr. Mabuse's answer - No.
Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 22:35:23
Go to Top of Page

Rumtopf
Banned

126 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  22:28:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Rumtopf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
If I missed any answers, please let me know.

I would like to see more people join in here.

Anyone?
Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 22:33:52
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  22:35:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Rumtopf:
Rumtopf's answer - He will answer as soon as Kil summons up the integrity to answer.

Well... Since I'm not willing to play your game, I guess that's about it. Right? No point in you being here anymore.

Or... You can support, with evidence, the accusation that Caroline Sturdy Colls has perpetrated a fraud, which is your claim to defend.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Rumtopf
Banned

126 Posts

Posted - 01/20/2014 :  22:39:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Rumtopf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
You must have missed this one Kil:

* Do you have any proof of mass graves at Treblinka? - Yes. - or - No. __?__

Dave W's answer - __?__

Liz W's answer - __?__

Kil's answer - __?__

Rumtopf's answer - No.

On fire for christ's answer - __?__

Dr. Mabuse's answer - No.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 17 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.27 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000