|
|
Goodmud
New Member
3 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 04:22:35 [Permalink]
|
Resonse to filthy: The gap you refer to between the death of Christ and the writings of which those who were His disciples were not far apart at all. Matthew's account is dated at about 50 a.d. so that would be less than 20 yrs. and the last living disciple The Apostle John lived till around 96 a.d. and peter and paul died around 64 a.d. so their accounts are all relatively close. The account of Jesus's body being removed from the cross is also written by John and Matthew stating the fact that Joseph of Arimathea and possibly Nicodemus went to Pilate secretly and asked for the body of Jesus(john19:38-42,Matthew27:57-61)both of whom were prominent men, Nicodemus also historically identified as being part of the Sanhedrin Counsel. |
|
|
ConsequentAtheist
SFN Regular
641 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 04:52:13 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by Goodmud
Matthew's account is dated at about 50 a.d. ...
By whom, other than, perhaps, a few Christian apologists? |
For the philosophical naturalist, the rejection of supernaturalism is a case of "death by a thousand cuts." -- Barbara Forrest, Ph.D. |
|
|
Goodmud
New Member
3 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 04:56:05 [Permalink]
|
response to slater:Non-Christian sources to the historical existence of Jesus. 1)Roman Historian-Cornelius Tacitus(55-120 a.d.) Work titled " Annals" 15.44;"Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had it's origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate...."
other writers include, Josephus(37-97 a.d.),Gaius Suetonius Tranquillas-Roman historian,secretary to the Emperor Hadrian(117-138 a.d.),Thallus (52 a.d.), Pliny the younger-Roman administrator and governor of bithynia in asia minor(80-112 a.d.) good refrence book to read,"The Historical Jesus, Ancient evidence for the life of Christ". author Gary R. Habermas Ph.d ,college press publishing company. |
|
|
Antie
Skeptic Friend
USA
101 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 06:25:50 [Permalink]
|
quote: response to slater:Non-Christian sources to the historical existence of Jesus. 1)Roman Historian-Cornelius Tacitus(55-120 a.d.) Work titled " Annals" 15.44;"Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had it's origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate...."
Haven't we beaten this dead horse enough? |
Antie. DIES GAUDII.
Facies Fabulosarum Feminarum
If you can name all six of the females in the picture above without looking up their names, and you can read the Latin phrase, pat yourself on the back. You're smart. |
|
|
CapelDodger
New Member
United Kingdom
3 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 06:35:55 [Permalink]
|
Goodmud - do give up on the Josephus reference, it really is getting tired. The reference to Tacitus mentions one 'Christus' - a name that doesn't really resemble 'Jesus'. Let's not forget that the Jewish messianists of this period were regarded in the Roman world much as Al-Qaeda are today, a reputation that the lumpen populace applied to Jews in general just as the lumpen of today do with all Arabs. This explains them being blamed for the fire in Rome, but the attitude of these messianists was nothing like the philosophy of 'Jesus' as given us by the Paulistas.
We have to take into account the possibility that later Paulistas who called themselves 'Christian' applied the term retrospectively to dead philosophers and chancers from Palestine and Egypt who were involved in the same business as Paul - the creation and/or promulgation of a synthetic religion from Greek and Judaic philosophy. Thus these people referred to later as early Christians may have had nothing to do with Paul or a 'Jesus' character.
Conversely, the Paulistas may themselves have retrospectively taken on the name of 'Christian' after various sects that had no actual resemblance to their thinking at all. |
What you see is what you get. It's what you don't see that'll get you. |
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 12:26:39 [Permalink]
|
RD Confused again: quote: Thanks for responding to my question. Please: cite the source of Aristotle's Maxim, cite references confirming consensus regarding your "two fundamental premises of historical inquiry", and confirm that you maintain John 19:25-37 to be inerrant. And, while you're at it, tell me if the reports of this unnamed man constitutes 1st-hand testimony, 2nd-hand testimony, nth-hand testimony, or pure fabrication, and how do you know?
Last one first,why do you keep bringing up inerrancy? A historical reference doesn' have to be inerrantto be reliable.Now the second if you had read any classical literature like Aristotle's The Art of Poetry you would have known the answers to both your second question and first.In that classic work he states that an ancient document is to be given the benefit of the doubt and this maxim is still highly regarded by Classical Scholars today.He also states it is common practice for some ancient writers to not reference themselvs in what they consider an epic work. |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
Edited by - darwin alogos on 12/05/2002 12:48:56 |
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 12:46:48 [Permalink]
|
Slater complained my sources weren't competent,here just two of their qalifications.BY THE WAY SLATE ITS BEEN OVER A MOUNTH SINCED I ASKED YOU FOR JUST ONE CLASSICAL OR HISTORIC SCHOLAR WHO SHARES YOUR WACKY VIEWS???????????? John Warwick Montgomery is Professor of Apologetics and Vice-President for Academic Affairs, UK and Europe, Trinity College and Theological Seminary (Indiana); Senior Counsel, European Centre for Law and Justice; and Emeritus Professor of Law and Humanities at the University of Luton (England).
Professor Montgomery holds ten earned degrees, including the LL.B.; LL.M. from Cardiff University, Wales; the A.B. with distinction in Philosophy (Cornell University; Phi Beta Kappa); B.L.S. and M.A. (University of California at Berkeley); B.D. and S.T.M. (Wittenburg University, Springfield, Ohio); M. Phil. in Law (University of Essex, England); Ph.D. (Univeristy of Chicago), and the Doctorat d'Université from Strasbourg, France. Before moving to the United Kingdom, he served on the faculty of the University of Chicago and was Chairman of the Department of History at Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada.
Dr. Montgomery is author of over one hundred scholarly journal articles and more than forty books in English, French, Spanish and German. He is internationally regarded both as a theologian (his debates with the late Bishop James Pike, death-of-God advocate Thomas Altizer, and situation-ethicist Joseph Fletcher are historic) and as a lawyer (barrister-at-law of the Middle Temple and Lincoln's Inn, England; member of the California, Virginia, Washington State, and District of Columbia Bars and the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States). He is one of only six persons to have received the Diploma of the International Institute of Human Rights cum laude, and was the Institute's Director of Studies from 1979 to 1981.
Professor Montgomery is honoured by inclusion in Who's Who in America, Who's Who in American Law, The Directory of American Scholars, Contemporary Authors, Who's Who in France, Who's Who in Europe, International Scholars Directory (editor-in-chief), and Who's Who in the World.
Along with Lord Hailsham and Sir Norman Anderson, he has recently received chapter-length treatment in Ross Clifford's book, Leading Lawyers' Case for the Resurrection (Edmonton: Canadian Institute for Law, Theology and Public Policy, 1996 Historian Edwin Yamauchi to speak at WMU March 1, 2002
KALAMAZOO -- An archaeologist, linguist and history scholar will combine his areas of expertise for an illustrated lecture on Jerusalem, when he visits Western Michigan University Tuesday and Wednesday, March 12-13.
Dr. Edwin Yamauchi, professor of history at Miami (Ohio) University, will address "Jerusalem Sacred City of Judaism, Christianity and Islam" at 7:30 p.m. in Room 2000 of Schneider Hall. The latest presentation in the H. Nicholas Hamner Speaker Series, Yamauchi's appearance is sponsored by the WMU Department of History and is free and open to the public.
An eminent archaeologist who has worked in Jerusalem under the dean of Israeli archaeologists, Dr. Benjamin Mazur, Yamauchi also is a linguist who has studied 22 languages and a scholar with an international reputation in biblical and near-Eastern research. The author or editor of 16 books, nearly 200 articles and 27 book chapters, Yamauchi himself has been the subject of book chapters that describe his contributions. His best-known work is "The World of the First Christians," a book that has appeared in 10 languages.
While at WMU, Yamauchi will present a second illustrated lecture titled "The Saga of the Dead Sea Scrolls" to WMU faculty, staff and students at 10 a.m. Wednesday, March 13, in Room 1021 of Brown Hall.
For more information, contact the WMU Department of History at (269) 387-4650.
Media contact: Marie Lee, 269 387-8400, marie.lee@wmich.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of University Relations
ps its GOOD To hear another voice of REASON GOODMUD! |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
Edited by - darwin alogos on 12/05/2002 12:52:46 |
|
|
Slater
SFN Regular
USA
1668 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 13:54:25 [Permalink]
|
Last one first,why do you keep bringing up inerrancy? You answered this yourself The Ancient Document Rule, which states that a document which is found in its normal custodial place should be received as long as it's free from both internal contradictions and found not to be in error about external known facts It was written in the wrong place, in the wrong language and at the wrong time, not in the normal custodial place. It contradicts known facts (laws of nature, Roman custom) and it even contradicts itself.
A historical reference doesn' have to be inerrantto be reliable. But this isn't an historical reference as it is not referencing any recorded history. And please explain how something can be in error and reliable at the same time.
Now the second if you had read any classical literature like Aristotle's The Art of Poetry you would have known the answers to both your second question and first. Ahh yes, DA sitting by the fire, with his pipe and slippers on a winter's evening thumbing through Aristotle. ROTFLOL In that classic work he states that an ancient document is to be given the benefit of the doubt and this maxim is still highly regarded by Classical Scholars today. No it isn't. They would have to be idiots. When was the last time that you gave the "benefit of the doubt" to an ancient document that wasn't Christian?
|
------- I learned something ... I learned that Jehovah's Witnesses do not celebrate Halloween. I guess they don't like strangers going up to their door and annoying them. -Bruce Clark There's No Toilet Paper...on the Road Less Traveled |
|
|
ConsequentAtheist
SFN Regular
641 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 14:37:08 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by darwin alogos
John Warwick Montgomery is Professor of Apologetics and Vice-President for Academic Affairs, UK and Europe, Trinity College and Theological Seminary (Indiana); Senior Counsel, European Centre for Law and Justice; and Emeritus Professor of Law and Humanities at the University of Luton (England).
My goodness - a veritable Professor of Apologetics and author of "God's Inerrant Word". I guess he must be right.
For those of you other than DA, see Critique of Montgomery's Arguments for the Legal Evidence for Christianity. |
For the philosophical naturalist, the rejection of supernaturalism is a case of "death by a thousand cuts." -- Barbara Forrest, Ph.D. |
Edited by - ConsequentAtheist on 12/05/2002 14:37:45 |
|
|
ConsequentAtheist
SFN Regular
641 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 15:00:03 [Permalink]
|
The Astrological Association's "Culture and Cosmos" Editorial Board: - Professor Anthony F. Aveni (Russell B.Colgate Professor of Astronomy and Anthropology, Colgate University, New York, author of Conversing with the Planets)
- Dr Guiseppe Bezza
- Professor J.Bruce Brackenbridge (Dept. of History of Science, Lawrence University)
- Dr David Brown (Wolfson College, Oxford)
- Dr Charles Burnett (Warburg Institute, London, co-trans. Abu Ma'shar, The Abbreviation of the Introduction to Astrology)
- Dr Hilary M.Carey (History Department, University of Newcastle, author Courting Disaster, Astrology at the English Court in the Later Middle Ages)
- Dr John Carlson (The Centre for Archaeoastronomy, Washington); Professor Robert Ellwood (Bashford Professor of Oriental Studies, University of South California)
- Dr Germana Ernst, (Department of Philosophy, University of Florence)
- Dr Ann Geneva (author of Astrology and the Seventeenth Century Mind)
- Dr Jacques Halbronn (author of Le Vie Astrologie il y a Cent Ans, La texte prophetique en France (1483-1883)
- Robert Hand (co-founder and chief editor, Project Hindsight, translator Antonius de Montulmo, Johannes Schoener, Guido Bonatti)
- Professor Norris Hetherington (Office for the History of Science and Technology, University of California, Berkeley)
- Professor Michael Hunter (Birkbeck College, London)
- Professor Ronald Hutton (Dept of Historical Studies, Bristol University, author of The Pagan Religions of the British Isles and The Stations of the Sun: A History of the Ritual Year in Britain)
- Dr Peter Kingsley
- Annabella Kitson, MA (editor Clio and Urania Confer: Astrology and History)
- Dr Nick Kollerstrom (author ‘The Star Temples of Harran', ‘Kepler's Belief in Astrology')
- Dr Edwin C.Krupp (Director, Griffith Observatory, Los Angeles, author, In Search of Ancient Astronomies, Echoes of Ancient Skies and Skywatchers, Shamans and Kings)
- Dr J.Lee Lehman (founder Classical Studies in Astrology, translator Papus, Astrology for Initiates)
- Professor Kenneth Negus (Professor of German, Princeton University, translator Kepler)
- Professor John North, (Professor of the Exact Sciences and Dean of the Philosophy Faculty, Groningen, author Horoscopes and History, The Fontana History of Astronomy and Cosmology and The Measure of the Universe: A History of Modern Cosmology)
- Professor P.M.Rattansi, (Professor Emeritus of the History and Philosophy of Science, University College, London)
- Professor Francesca Rochberg (Department of History, University of California, translator of the Enuma Anu Enlil)
- Professor James Santucci, (Dept. of Religious Studies, California State University, editor Theosophical History)
- Robert Schmidt (co-founder Project Hindsight, translator Ptolemy, Vettius Valens, Haphaistio of Thebes, Antiochus of Athens, Paulus Alexandrinus)
- Professor Richard Tarnas (author of The Passion of the Western Mind, professor of Philosophy and Psychology at the California Institute of Integral Studies, director of the graduate programme in Philosophy, Cosmology and Consciousness)
- Dr. David Ulansey (California Institute of Integral Studies, author of The Origins of the Mithraic Mysteries)
- Robin Waterfield (translator of Xenophon, Plutarch and Plato for both Oxford University Press and Cambridge University Press)
- Dr Charles Webster (All Soul's College, author, From Paracelsus to Newton: Magic and the Making of Modern Science)
- Dr Graziella Federici Vescovini (Department of Philosophy, University of Florence)
- Dr Angela Voss
- Dr Paula Zambelli (Department of Philosophy, University of Florence)
- Robert Zoller (co-founder Project Hindsight, translator Guido Bonnati, Al-Kindi)
|
For the philosophical naturalist, the rejection of supernaturalism is a case of "death by a thousand cuts." -- Barbara Forrest, Ph.D. |
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 20:47:23 [Permalink]
|
DA asks for the 100th time: quote: BY THE WAY SLATE ITS BEEN OVER A MOUNTH SINCED I ASKED YOU FOR JUST ONE CLASSICAL OR HISTORIC SCHOLAR WHO SHARES YOUR WACKY VIEWS????????????
Slater responds: quote: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
I guess that means NO? |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 20:57:13 [Permalink]
|
RD confused again: quote: The Astrological Association's "Culture and Cosmos" Editorial Board:
Professor Anthony F. Aveni (Russell B.Colgate Professor of Astronomy and Anthropology, Colgate University, New York, author of Conversing with the Planets) Dr Guiseppe Bezza Professor J.Bruce Brackenbridge (Dept. of History of Science, Lawrence University) Dr David Brown (Wolfson College, Oxford) Dr Charles Burnett (Warburg Institute, London, co-trans. Abu Ma'shar, The Abbreviation of the Introduction to Astrology) Dr Hilary M.Carey (History Department, University of Newcastle, author Courting Disaster, Astrology at the English Court in the Later Middle Ages) Dr John Carlson (The Centre for Archaeoastronomy, Washington); Professor Robert Ellwood (Bashford Professor of Oriental Studies, University of South California)ect... o, DA, given such an effusive accumulation of Doctors and Professors, do you not now find yourself compelled to embrace astrology? ReasonableDoubt Posted - 12/05/2002 : 14:37:08
Irelevant conclusion,first,the study of ancient documents is not an esoteric science(are you going to go on record and say it is?).Secondly,are these distinguished scholars promoting or investigating? |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
Edited by - darwin alogos on 12/05/2002 20:58:27 |
|
|
Slater
SFN Regular
USA
1668 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 21:05:41 [Permalink]
|
I gave you an answer and you got upset, poor baby, or did you forget that? I explained to you why your request was stupid. RD just gave you a lengthy example of why your request is stupid
You keep asking even though your request is senseless, even though you got an answer. You are trying to imply that I am evading answering while not reading what anyone writes. Can you possibly be so dim? Do you think tis nonsense helps your position? It makes you look like even more of an idiot. |
------- I learned something ... I learned that Jehovah's Witnesses do not celebrate Halloween. I guess they don't like strangers going up to their door and annoying them. -Bruce Clark There's No Toilet Paper...on the Road Less Traveled |
|
|
Slater
SFN Regular
USA
1668 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2002 : 22:54:27 [Permalink]
|
Irelevant conclusion.... Sweetmotherofgod can you possibly be this f***ing dense ? RD just gave you a list of experts in the field. You said that they are not relevant. You are right, it is the facts that matter. You can get experts on any bullshit subject. You also hold up "experts", Professor of Apologetics-not experts in ancient documents. Experts are irrelevant.
An apologist, by the way, is a defender of a doctrine not a seeker of the truth. Their only intrest is finding excuses not facts.
|
------- I learned something ... I learned that Jehovah's Witnesses do not celebrate Halloween. I guess they don't like strangers going up to their door and annoying them. -Bruce Clark There's No Toilet Paper...on the Road Less Traveled |
Edited by - Slater on 12/05/2002 22:55:00 |
|
|
ConsequentAtheist
SFN Regular
641 Posts |
Posted - 12/06/2002 : 06:42:53 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by darwin alogos
A historical reference doesn' have to be inerrantto be reliable.
Fool! |
For the philosophical naturalist, the rejection of supernaturalism is a case of "death by a thousand cuts." -- Barbara Forrest, Ph.D. |
|
|
|
|
|
|