Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Conspiracy Theories
 We Never Went to Mars, Saturn and the Moon - 2
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 15

zaphod beeblebrox
New Member

15 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  10:29:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send zaphod beeblebrox a Private Message
Nobrain take a look at this time lapse photo http://www.noao.edu/outreach/aop/observers/deepimpact/tempeltrail.jpg That alone proves that the comet got brighter
And now look at this before and after image of the comet http://spaceflightnow.com/deepimpact/050704faulkes.html
How can you say it has all ways been that bright
And now lastly I can say that I was was watching the comet through a telescope it was quite faint but then when the impactor hit it suddenly lit up now please Nobrain explain how NASA made the comet bright up when I was looking through the telescope(Note English is not my first language so I apologize for any bad grammar)

Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. ~Douglas Adams
Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  10:59:52   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
Originally posted by zaphod beeblebrox

"... And now lastly I can say that I was was watching the comet through a telescope it was quite faint but then when the impactor hit it suddenly lit up now please Nobrain explain how NASA made the comet bright up when I was looking through the telescope... "

Surely those images are fake and you are another liar or you have been a pray to suggestion.

You have seen the comet resplendent more than stars around.

Brightness of a comet is not due to its nucleus. That ridiculous "explosion" could not increase its brightness

"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Edited by - bigbrain on 08/17/2005 11:01:17
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  11:13:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
Once again folks quit trying to change nobrains mind, he is not serious.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

Siberia
SFN Addict

Brazil
2322 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  11:32:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Siberia's Homepage  Send Siberia an AOL message  Send Siberia a Yahoo! Message Send Siberia a Private Message
Don't feed the troll.

"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?"
- The Kovenant, Via Negativa

"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs."
-- unknown
Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  11:38:31   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
Originally posted by Siberia

"Don't feed the troll"

I'm not a troll, I'm a skeptic (incredulous) person

Have you seen this movie?
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/deepimpact/multimedia/070405-HRI-impact.html

Tell the truth: doesn't Tempel 1 look like a bull?

STOP THE MOVIE TO SEE BETTER AND ANSWER MY QUESTION

"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Edited by - bigbrain on 08/17/2005 11:43:55
Go to Top of Page

Fripp
SFN Regular

USA
727 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  11:46:52   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fripp a Private Message
I will repeat my question again...

quote:
Originally posted by bigbrain
There is more oxygen in the water than in the air



Then why is water used to extinguish fires?

By your explanation, water is more flammable than air.

"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"

"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"

"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?"
Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  12:27:09   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
Originally posted by Fripp
"I will repeat my question again...

Originally posted by bigbrain
"There is more oxygen in the water than in the air"

Then why is water used to extinguish fires?

By your explanation, water is more flammable than air".

We know very little about everything: water is formed by hydrogen and oxygen. Why doesn't it explode


"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  12:44:33   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
You are both wrong, at high enough temperatures the water will break down and feed oxygen and hydrogen to a fire sometimes explosively (thus more flammable than air). It doesnt explode at low temps because a large amount of energy is required to break the strong chemical bonds.

from answers.com
quote:
when the fire involves burning metals (lithium, magnesium, etc), it becomes useful to consider the chemistry of combustion. Putting water on such a fire could result in the fire getting hotter (or even exploding) because water (H20) contains oxygen that can be set free at high temperatures, and the freed hydrogen is also explosive. Therefore, other specialized chemicals must typically be used to break the chain reaction of metallic combustion— to stop the fire.


"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Edited by - BigPapaSmurf on 08/17/2005 12:45:42
Go to Top of Page

Fripp
SFN Regular

USA
727 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  12:48:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fripp a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by bigbrain
We know very little about everything: water is formed by hydrogen and oxygen. Why doesn't it explode


You can't get away by pleading ignorance (although I would argue that this whole thread has spotlighted your ignorance).

You claimed that explosions can't happen in space because there is no oxygen. Someone else came back and said that, if that was the case, then explosions couldn't happen underwater because there is no oxygen down there. You replied saying because of oxygen bound up in the H2O molecule, water has more oxygen than air. Now when i point the fallacy of that argument (if you think of it, if the oxygen in water can fuel an explosion, then the remaining hydrogen should also explode as well--chemists, can I get any professional assistance on this?), you plead ignorance. AGAIN, you're stupidity is exposed.

"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"

"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"

"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?"
Go to Top of Page

Fripp
SFN Regular

USA
727 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  12:53:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fripp a Private Message
My previous post was written before I saw BigPapa's. Thanks Big Papa. Even though this is an idiotic thread, we are actually learning something (well...except for BigIdiot).

"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"

"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"

"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?"
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  13:01:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by bigbrain

Originally posted by zaphod beeblebrox

"... And now lastly I can say that I was was watching the comet through a telescope it was quite faint but then when the impactor hit it suddenly lit up now please Nobrain explain how NASA made the comet bright up when I was looking through the telescope... "

Surely those images are fake and you are another liar or you have been a pray to suggestion.

You have seen the comet resplendent more than stars around.

Brightness of a comet is not due to its nucleus. That ridiculous "explosion" could not increase its brightness



As Zaph here relates, he also personally witnessed the impact through a telescope. I'll go out on a limb here and suggest that Zaph was using a personal telescope and was not relying on images. His question was why did Temple 1 brighten in his own scope when NASA could not have tampered with the media he was viewing. (I.E. direct observation)

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  13:03:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by bigbrain

Originally posted by Fripp
"I will repeat my question again...

Originally posted by bigbrain
"There is more oxygen in the water than in the air"

Then why is water used to extinguish fires?

By your explanation, water is more flammable than air".

We know very little about everything: water is formed by hydrogen and oxygen. Why doesn't it explode





Oooooo. I KNOW this one. Because oxygen is inflammable. Or are you suggesting that my MSDS for oxygen is wrong.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  13:08:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
Originally posted by Fripp

"... AGAIN, you're stupidity is exposed".

Also Leonardo da Vinci was not much interested in chemistry.

Was he an idiot then?

Tell us, since you are so intelligent, why NASA's buffoons built this biggest crane before going to the Moon?
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001287.jpg


"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Go to Top of Page

Fripp
SFN Regular

USA
727 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  13:13:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fripp a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by bigbrain
But what is that light? An explosion? But an explosion needs oxygen.



From: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy99/phy99463.htm

Only one type of explosion requires oxygen - an oxidation reaction. There are others... for example a nuclear explosion. Both produce heat.

quote:
Originally posted by bigbrain
Also Leonardo da Vinci was not much interested in chemistry.

Was he an idiot then?




Please...don't even think of comparing yourself to DaVinci.

It's your inability to think that makes you an idiot.

"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?"

"Oh, I'm sorry. I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a small thermal exhaust port that's only 2-meters wide! That thing wasn't even fully paid off yet! You have any idea what this is going to do to my credit?!?!"

"What? Oh, oh, 'just rebuild it'? Oh, real [bleep]ing original. And who's gonna give me a loan, jackhole? You? You got an ATM on that torso LiteBrite?"
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 08/17/2005 :  13:18:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by bigbrain

Originally posted by Fripp

"... AGAIN, you're stupidity is exposed".

Also Leonardo da Vinci was not much interested in chemistry.

Was he an idiot then?

Tell us, since you are so intelligent, why NASA's buffoons built this biggest crane before going to the Moon?
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001287.jpg





da Vinci didn't offer opinions on chemistry, either. You have. That the assumptions contained concerning chemistry in your post being erroneous doesn't impact da Vinci in the slightest.

And since the rocket parts themselves when in finalized stage form are quite heavy and need to be lifted, why does the existance of a crane this size surprise you?

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 15 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.19 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000