Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Health
 My Healing Experience
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 6

Storm
SFN Regular

USA
708 Posts

Posted - 03/03/2006 :  14:15:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Storm's Homepage Send Storm a Private Message
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

quote:
What kind of ghostly phenomenon? Full blown apparitions or just poltergeist activity, or both? What phenomenon did you experience? Can you fully discount absentminded placing the tan meter there?




I did not see any full blown apparition..Although the present residents have...Poltergeist activity...Could be the woman who resides in the house... she was the one who mostly saw the full apparitional type phenomenon... YesI can fully discount absentmindedness..

Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 03/03/2006 :  15:19:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message
Storm stated:
quote:
YesI can fully discount absentmindedness..
How is it that can you "fully" discount absentmindedness? Just by saying so? It seems to me that having picked up the wrong meter by accident would be a simple explanation, and would not reflect badly upon you. But jumping to "poltergeist" as the explanation shows very poor reasoning. How could you possibly, and with certainty, discount having picked up the wrong meter? Do you have a video recording of your movements, which you've double-checked?


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Edited by - HalfMooner on 03/03/2006 15:27:01
Go to Top of Page

Storm
SFN Regular

USA
708 Posts

Posted - 03/17/2006 :  11:36:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Storm's Homepage Send Storm a Private Message
Well have not been around awhile...Working..cleaning..beaching...But today I have some time.
originally posted by Dave W

quote:
No, the best you came up with was "a ghost is an apparition which..." but since "apparition" means "ghost-like figure," your definition needed definition, which you never supplied.
quote:


let us not say "never" Dave. I must disagree. I have discussed numerous times what.. through my research and the research of others a ghost is? Residual energy of a past event.

Originally posted by Dave W

quote:
You're very quick, Storm, to jump to conclusions about what skeptics will think of a certain situation. You should try - sometime - to just tell one of your stories, without trying to figure out what the skeptics will say. You're not very good at that part.




I am not quick to jump to conclusions about what skeptics will think. You have said it outright what you think. Especially of theories and beliefs concerning ghosts. I do try that is why I come to this site and post these certain forums.
Originally psoted by Halfmooner
How is it that can you "fully" discount absentmindedness? Just by saying so? It seems to me that having picked up the wrong meter by accident would be a simple explanation, and would not reflect badly upon you. But jumping to "poltergeist" as the explanation shows very poor reasoning. How could you possibly, and with certainty, discount having picked up the wrong meter? Do you have a video recording of your movements, which you've double-checked?


No by the others I was with remember me putting the meter in my bag. I have jumped to no conclusions, including a poltergeist one.
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 03/17/2006 :  15:14:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
Storm said:
quote:
let us not say "never" Dave. I must disagree. I have discussed numerous times what.. through my research and the research of others a ghost is? Residual energy of a past event.



And here we are again. Right back to your nonsensical nonsense.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

R.Wreck
SFN Regular

USA
1191 Posts

Posted - 03/18/2006 :  10:40:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send R.Wreck a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Storm:

I have discussed numerous times what.. through my research and the research of others a ghost is? Residual energy of a past event.



How is this energy measured? What are it's properties? How does it interact with matter? How can you convert this energy to work? What repeatable test can you conduct to demonstrate that this "residual energy" exists? What testable predictions does your theory make?

The foundation of morality is to . . . give up pretending to believe that for which there is no evidence, and repeating unintelligible propositions about things beyond the possibliities of knowledge.
T. H. Huxley

The Cattle Prod of Enlightened Compassion
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 03/18/2006 :  15:55:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by R.Wreck
quote:
Originally posted by Storm:

I have discussed numerous times what.. through my research and the research of others a ghost is? Residual energy of a past event.



How is this energy measured? What are it's properties? How does it interact with matter? How can you convert this energy to work? What repeatable test can you conduct to demonstrate that this "residual energy" exists? What testable predictions does your theory make?

Since the energy produces visual images, how do we recognise these images? Is the energy converted into photons for our eyes to observe, or does the energy directly interfere with the cognitive processes in the brain to produce a hallucination of a ghost?

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

Storm
SFN Regular

USA
708 Posts

Posted - 03/19/2006 :  16:38:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Storm's Homepage Send Storm a Private Message
Originally posted by Dude

quote:
Right back to your nonsensical nonsense.




I wouldn't say nonsensical.

Originally posted by R. Wreck

quote:
How is this energy measured? What are it's properties? How does it interact with matter? How can you convert this energy to work? What repeatable test can you conduct to demonstrate that this "residual energy" exists? What testable predictions does your theory make?


I do not have the answer to some of these questions. One thing about the theory is that it has not been able to be measured or repeated,well at least a controlled repitition. it has only been observed, photographed . But the numerous observations of the public and photographs leads me and others to believe sosmething is happening in these haunted locations. Most observations are of the non communicative type. An apparition of a person or persons usuallly in period clothing. These non communicative apparitions show no awareness to others around. It leads investigators to beleive that maybe the body eminates some type of energy that is captured in the environment to be replayed at a certain times to those who are called "Sensitive" for not everyone sees a ghost.
We have not discovered all the mysteries of the Universe. Look at how long it took us to understand radio waves but yet they always existed. So too with residual energy
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 03/19/2006 :  22:12:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
Thjaslk djjdh jkw wkekeklw w;ofgnei enndiioe klsa;ljv. Nbfhewi jhwj wk a jwwj aalwkjf vnyutywoswwkwqfnngoeriwn.

Qsttry hd bhrrraj k ldk jjeb ospfngpozjw kkvk wq[s kjjwjavnbeuytw. Jhggabffgrt nsjd ejdbf lqpiejc ;aeikned.

Eyshvoofm mejduj mes.

That makes more sense than Storm's explanation of ghosts.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 03/20/2006 :  06:19:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Storm


Originally posted by R. Wreck

quote:
How is this energy measured? What are it's properties? How does it interact with matter? How can you convert this energy to work? What repeatable test can you conduct to demonstrate that this "residual energy" exists? What testable predictions does your theory make?


I do not have the answer to some of these questions. One thing about the theory is that it has not been able to be measured or repeated,well at least a controlled repitition.


Then it's not a theory. It's conjecture.

quote:
it has only been observed, photographed . But the numerous observations of the public and photographs leads me and others to believe sosmething is happening in these haunted locations. Most observations are of the non communicative type. An apparition of a person or persons usuallly in period clothing.


Yup. Conjecture.

quote:
These non communicative apparitions show no awareness to others around. It leads investigators to beleive that maybe the body eminates some type of energy that is captured in the environment to be replayed at a certain times to those who are called "Sensitive" for not everyone sees a ghost.


"Replay" hauntings have had stories about them for millenia. So what? How does that relate to the energy conjecture that you are adhering to? How does it provide even anectdotal evidence for the energy conjecture that you are adhering to?

quote:

We have not discovered all the mysteries of the Universe. Look at how long it took us to understand radio waves but yet they always existed. So too with residual energy



No we don't have all the answers. But the answers we do have are based on observation and measurements. You don't have a measurement methodology that has any studies to back it up. How do you expect to attach any sort of validity to a conjecture that has no measurement methodologies?

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 6 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.16 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000