|
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
 Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:37:00 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
Kil:
"Why don't you summon up some integrity and actually engage in an honest debate or discussion?"
You got it Kil.
Kil, let's you and me discuss the different answers that Dave W and Liz W gave to the following question:
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Who do you think is right Kil?
|
Sorry but this is the thirteenth time I have asked you to provide proof. Is it that English is not your native language? I tried to make it easy for you by giving you the definition of proof. Proof please. |
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
 |
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:42:14 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
|
Once again, emoticons do not equal proof. Proof please. |
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:42:19 [Permalink]
|
Sorry LizW, but this is what we are discussing now:
Kil:
"Why don't you summon up some integrity and actually engage in an honest debate or discussion?"
You got it Kil.
Kil, let's you and me discuss the different answers that Dave W and Liz W gave to the following question:
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Who do you think is right Kil?
(BTW Kil, I've summoned up some integrity and I want to actually engage in an honest debate or discussion. So what are you waiting for?) |
| Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 15:44:35 |
|
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:45:29 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
Sorry LizW, but this is what we are discussing now:
Kil:
"Why don't you summon up some integrity and actually engage in an honest debate or discussion?"
You got it Kil.
Kil, let's you and me discuss the different answers that Dave W and Liz W gave to the following question:
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Who do you think is right Kil?
|
Sorry Rumtopf: this IS what we're discussing now. Proof and how you are supposed to be supplying it. |
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:45:50 [Permalink]
|
Sorry LizW, but this is what we are discussing now:
Kil:
"Why don't you summon up some integrity and actually engage in an honest debate or discussion?"
You got it Kil.
Kil, let's you and me discuss the different answers that Dave W and Liz W gave to the following question:
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Who do you think is right Kil?
(BTW Kil, I've summoned up some integrity and I want to actually engage in an honest debate or discussion. So what are you waiting for?) |
| Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 15:46:19 |
|
|
|
Kil
Evil Skeptic
USA
13477 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:46:05 [Permalink]
|
Rumtopf. Do you feel that LizW's answers are wrong? Yes or no.
Do you feel that Dave's answers are correct? Yes or no.
Provide an explanation for why you think either one of them has given an incorrect answer. Please provide evidence to support your conclusions. |
Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.
Why not question something for a change?
Genetic Literacy Project |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:47:34 [Permalink]
|
Kil:
"Rumtopf. Do you feel that LizW's answers are wrong? Yes or no.
Do you feel that Dave's answers are correct? Yes or no.
Provide an explanation for why you think either one of them has given an incorrect answer. Please provide evidence for your conclusions."
Alright - let's have a discussion!
Kil, since I asked you first, you answer first.
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Who do you think is right Kil? |
| Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 15:48:03 |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:49:47 [Permalink]
|
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Kil's answer - ?
Rumtopf's answer - will come right after kils. |
|
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:52:35 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
Kil:
"Rumtopf. Do you feel that LizW's answers are wrong? Yes or no.
Do you feel that Dave's answers are correct? Yes or no.
Provide an explanation for why you think either one of them has given an incorrect answer. Please provide evidence for your conclusions."
Alright - let's have a discussion!
Kil, since I asked you first, you answer first.
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Who do you think is right Kil?
|
I am still waiting for proof here. Do you not understand your own subject well enough to provide proof? There may be some books at your local library which would help you to find proof. Then you would be capable of presenting proof. |
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:54:18 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
Talking about antisemitism and banning rather than answering questions or offering an iota of proof for their beliefs. |
Another lie. Goebbels would be proud. I provided plenty of proof for my conclusion.
I'm still waiting for you to provide evidence in support of the claim in your OP. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:55:52 [Permalink]
|
There you are Dave W!
Alright, let's get this debate going!
What do you think about Liz W's answer Dave?
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Kil's answer - ?
Rumtopf's answer - will come right after kils. |
| Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 15:56:56 |
|
|
|
Kil
Evil Skeptic
USA
13477 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:57:17 [Permalink]
|
Rumtopf:
Kil, since I asked you first, you answer first. |
Get something straight. You are playing in my sandbox. You will not dictate to me the game that you want to play.
Two people have answered your questions. That should be enough to go on if you actually think a fraud was committed. In fact, it's too much because you should be able to defend your position without playing games. So:
Rumtopf. Do you feel that LizW's answers are wrong? Yes or no.
Do you feel that Dave's answers are correct? Yes or no.
Provide an explanation for why you think either one of them has given an incorrect answer. Please provide evidence to support your conclusions. |
Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.
Why not question something for a change?
Genetic Literacy Project |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 16:00:27 [Permalink]
|
Kil, since I asked you first, you answer first.
Kil's answer - ?
Rumtopf's answer - will come right after kils. |
| Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 16:01:44 |
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 16:00:41 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
There you are Dave W!
Alright, let's get this debate going!
What do you think about Liz W's answer Dave? |
Why won't you discuss Liz' answers with her? Is it for the same reason you won't discuss Sturdy Colls' work with Sturdy Colls?
You're scared of girls, aren't you, Rumtopf? |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
 |
|
Archaeological Fraud At Treblinka
