|
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 14:19:32 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
# 2 - At Treblinka II, it is known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that, to date, no less than __?__ extant graves have been discovered, in which legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators have - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented forensic science - literally / truly - physically unearthed / tangibly located - actual, verifiable, scientifically proven human remains.
# 3 - Is it true or false that, at - Treblinka II - there were actual trash and/or trash burning pits and/or latrine pits / trenches and/or water wells that were dug / used as such by the Germans - during their time of occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__
# 4 - Is it true or false that, at - Treblinka II - there were numerous exploratory excavations dug by so-called “robbery diggers / treasure seekers,” and/or by Soviet / Polish investigators - after the time of German occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__
# 5 - Is it true or false that, extraneous cremation remains have been deposited at - Treblinka II - after the time of German occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__
(Remember, the issue here isn’t about history per se - it's about the duplicity of the sham archaeologists who fraudulently claim that they have scientifically proven it.) |
Question #1 Yes
Question #2 Infinity
Question #3 False
Question #4 False
Question #5 False
What is my proof you ask. Same as you Rumtopf, I don't feel the need to be able to present a cogent argument and defend it. These are the answers because that's what I want them to be. Go ahead douche, look for something, anything that will prove me wrong with 100% CERTAINTY.
|
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
 |
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
 Posted - 01/20/2014 : 14:44:31 [Permalink]
|
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Kil's answer - He can't summon up the integrity to answer.
Well now, it looks like we have the makings for a discussion!
Kill, if you can summon up the integrity to answer:
Who is right - Dave W or Liz W?
|
| Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 14:47:51 |
|
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 14:53:14 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Kil's answer - He can't summon up the integrity to answer.
Well now, it looks like we have the makings for a discussion!
Kill, if you can summon up the integrity to answer:
Who is right - Dave W or Liz W?
|
No no no, quid pro quo Dr. Lecter. I answered your questions so you get to deal with me now. Where is your proof? |
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 14:53:32 [Permalink]
|
Kil:
| It's already been explained to you the problems we have with your questions. |
Well Kil, I must have missed it. Please tell me, in your own words, what you don't understand about the following questions:
# 3 - Is it true or false that, at - Treblinka II - there were actual trash and/or trash burning pits and/or latrine pits / trenches and/or water wells that were dug / used as such by the Germans - during their time of occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__
# 4 - Is it true or false that, at - Treblinka II - there were numerous exploratory excavations dug by so-called “robbery diggers / treasure seekers,” and/or by Soviet / Polish investigators - after the time of German occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__
# 5 - Is it true or false that, extraneous cremation remains have been deposited at - Treblinka II - after the time of German occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__
(BTW Kil, Liz W understood the questions well enough to answer them - why can't you?) |
|
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 14:55:45 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
Kil:
| It's already been explained to you the problems we have with your questions. |
Well Kil, I must have missed it. Please tell me, in your own words, what you don't understand about the following questions:
# 3 - Is it true or false that, at - Treblinka II - there were actual trash and/or trash burning pits and/or latrine pits / trenches and/or water wells that were dug / used as such by the Germans - during their time of occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__
# 4 - Is it true or false that, at - Treblinka II - there were numerous exploratory excavations dug by so-called “robbery diggers / treasure seekers,” and/or by Soviet / Polish investigators - after the time of German occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__
# 5 - Is it true or false that, extraneous cremation remains have been deposited at - Treblinka II - after the time of German occupation? - TRUE. - or - FALSE. __?__
(BTW Kil, Liz W understood the questions well enough to answer them - why can't you?)
|
Why are you ignoring me Rumtopf? Why aren't you presenting your proof? |
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 14:57:02 [Permalink]
|
Liz W:
"Go ahead douche"
Oh Liz, you just ruined things for yourself here. |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 14:58:21 [Permalink]
|
Liz W:
"I answered your questions so you get to deal with me now."
 |
| Edited by - Rumtopf on 01/20/2014 14:59:05 |
|
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:02:11 [Permalink]
|
| Emoticons don't equal proof. You were waiting for answers and I provided them. I am waiting for proof. |
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:04:01 [Permalink]
|
Come now Kil, you wanted a discussion and we finally have the makings for one.
Let's get it on Kil!
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Kil's answer - He can't summon up the integrity to answer.
Well now, it looks like we have the makings for a discussion!
Kill, if you can summon up the integrity to answer:
Who is right - Dave W or Liz W?
What are you waiting for Kil?
What are you so afraid of? |
|
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:06:00 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
Come now Kil, you wanted a discussion and we finally have the makings for one.
Let's get it on Kil!
# 1 - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science that, at - Treblinka II - there are extant graves in which actual human remains have literally been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators? - Yes. - or - No. __?__
LizW's answer - Yes.
Dave W's answer - No.
Kil's answer - He can't summon up the integrity to answer.
Well now, it looks like we have the makings for a discussion!
Kill, if you can summon up the integrity to answer:
Who is right - Dave W or Liz W?
What are you waiting for Kil?
What are you so afraid of?
|
Sorry Kil's not here right now. It is just you and me. Proof please. (see I even asked nicely) |
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:06:07 [Permalink]
|
Liz W:
"You were waiting for answers and I provided them."
Why is the answer you provided different than the one Dave W provided?
Please explain why you think you are right and Dave W is wrong.
 |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:07:54 [Permalink]
|
Look at Kil run away from the discussion he so desperately wanted.
And Kil was questioning the integrity of others?
 |
|
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:09:38 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
Liz W:
"You were waiting for answers and I provided them."
Why is the answer you provided different than the one Dave W provided?
Please explain why you think you are right and Dave W is wrong.
|
This was not what I requested from you Rumtopf. I asked for you to provide your proof. Distraction doesn't work with me. Proof please.
|
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
|
|
|
Rumtopf
Banned
126 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:09:49 [Permalink]
|
What do you think Dave W? What do you think about Liz W's answer?
Let's get the discussion going here! |
|
|
|
LizW
Skeptic Friend
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 01/20/2014 : 15:12:08 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by Rumtopf
What do you think Dave W? What do you think about Liz W's answer?
Let's get the discussion going here!
|
Our discussion is in full swing. It is happening now, and it is waiting for you to provide your proof. |
You learn something new every g****mn day! |
|
|
 |
|
Archaeological Fraud At Treblinka
